MEANING MIND AND LAEPDF电子书下载

1 Moral Evaluation and Conceptual Analysis in Jurisprudential Methodology (with John Oberdiek) in Michael Freeman and Ross Harrison (eds), Law and Philosophy, Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 60-75 1

2 Dworkin on the Semantics of Legal and Political Concepts Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26, 2006, pp. 545-57 17

3 Wittgenstein on Understanding and Interpretation (Comments on the work of Thomas Morawetz) Philosophical Investigations, 29, 2006, pp. 129?9 31

4 Notes on the Methodology Debate in Contemporary Jurisprudence: Why Sociologists might be Interested in Michael Freeman (ed.), Law and Sociology, Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 254-8 43

5 Interpretation in Law San Diego Law Review, 42, 2005, pp. 685-709. (Symposium Issue devoted to Legal Interpretation) 49

6 Fashionable Nonsense Texas Law Review, 81, 2003, pp. 841-94. (Review Essay) 75

7 Normativity and Objectivity in Law William and Mary Law Review, 43, 2001, pp. 325-63. (Reprinted in Dennis Patterson, ed., 2004 Wittgenstein and Law) 129

8 Explicating the Internal Point of View Southern Methodist University Law Review, 52, 1999, pp. 61-74. (Symposium on the Jurisprudence of H.L.A. Hart) 169

9 Langdell's Legacy Northwestern University Law Review, 90, 1995, pp. 196-203. (Symposium Issue) 177

10 Wittgenstein and Constitutional Theory Texas Law Review, 72, 1994, pp. 1837-55. (Symposium Issue) 185

11 Conscience and the Constitution Columbia Law Review, 93, 1993, pp. 270-307. (reviewing Philip Bobbitt, Constitutional Interpretation) 205

12 Law's Pragmatism: A Theory of Law as Practice and Narrative Virginia Law Review, 76, 1990, pp. 937-96 243

13 Law's Practice Columbia Law Review, 90, 1990, pp. 575-600. (reviewing Karl Llewellyn, The Case Law System in America) 303

14 Realist Semantics and Legal Theory Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 2, 1989, pp. 175-9. (Reprinted in T.D. Campbell (ed.), 1992, The International Library of Essays in Law and Legal Theory) 329

15 Interpretation in Law: Toward a Reconstruction of the Current Debate Villanova Law Review, 29, 1984, pp. 671-94. (Reprinted in Law Review Digest, 34, 1985) 335

Name Index 359