PART Ⅰ： PROLOGUE 3
I PARTICULARS AND UNIVERSALS&Neil MacCormick 3
PART 2： THE ETHICAL AND INSTITUTIONAL SETTING FOR LEGAL DECISION MAKING 25
2 IN THE JUDGEMENT SPACE： THE JUDGE AND THE ANXIETY OF THE ENCOUNTER&Zenon Bankowski 25
3 THE INSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINTS ON PARTICULARISM&Jobn Bell 41
4 THE BURDEN OF UNIVERSALISM&Neil Walker 53
5 ADJUDICATION AND THE PARTICULAR&Fernando Atria 69
6 THE END OF MORALITY： RADICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE PARTICULARITY&Michael Detmold 83
PART 3： MORAL PERCEPTION AND MORAL REASONING 97
7 ELIDING THE PARTICULAR： A COMMENT ON 97
NEIL MACCORMICKSPARTICULARS AND UNIVERSALS’&Emilios Cbristodoulidis 97
8 PRACTICAL REASON AND CHARACTER TRAITS： REMARKS ON MACCORMICKS SENTIMENTALIST THEORY OF MORAL PERCEPTION&Claudio Micbelon 115
9 DIACHRONIC UNIVERSALIZATION AND THE LAW&Emmanuel Melissaris 129
10 ‘A VERY UNIQUE CASE’： REFLECTIONS ON NEIL MACCORMICKS THEORY OF UNIVERSALIZATION IN PRACTICAL REASONING&Scott Veitcb 143
PART 4： LEGAL THEORY IN A PHILOSOPHICAL CONTEXT 159
11 TWO CONCEPTIONS OF UNIVERSALIZATION&George Pavlakos 159
12 TWO PARTICULAR TRUTHS： A RESPONSE TO NEIL MACCORMICK’ S ‘PARTICULARS AND UNIVERSALS’&Victor Tadros 177
13 PARTICULARS AND UNIVERSALS IN LEGAL JUSTIFICATION&Aleksander Peczenik 191
PART 5： THE JUDGEMENT OF SOLOMON 205
14 THE COURTROOM AS LABORATORY： UNIVERSALISM AND EVIDENTIARY REASONING&Burkbard Scbafer 205
15 UNIVERSALIZABILITY AND INTUITION： SOLOMON AND SECULARIZATION&Bernard Jackson 223
16 PARTICULARITY AND MEDICAL LAW&J. Kenyon Mason 235
17 THOUGHTS ON MACCORMICK S’ ‘PARTICULARS AND UNIVERSALS’&Nicola Lacey 247
PART 6： EPILOGUE 253
18 AN ATTEMPTED RESPONSE&Neil MacCormick 253
INDEX OF NAMES 265
SUBJECT INDEX 269