PART Ⅰ LAW AND LEGAL THEORY 3
1 Philip Milton （1982）, ‘David Hume and the Eighteenth-Century Conception of Natural Law, Legal Studies, 2, pp.14-33 3
2 Sheldon Wein （1990）, ‘David Hume and the Empiricist Theory of Law’, Man and Nature, 9, pp.33-44 23
3 Neil McArthur （2004）, ‘David Hume’s Legal Theory: The Significance of General Laws’, History of European Ideas, 30, pp.149-66 35
4 Alfons Beitzinger （1975）, ‘The Place of Hume in the History of Jurisprudence’, American Journal ofJurisprudence, 20, pp.20-37 53
PART Ⅱ JUSTICE 75
Origins 75
5 Ian F.G.Baxter （1959）, ‘David Hume and Justice’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 13, pp.112-31 75
6 Andrew Lister （2005）, ‘Hume and Rawls on the Circumstances and Priority of Justice’, History of Political Thought, 26, pp.664-95 95
Obligation 129
7 Luigi Bagolini （1981）, ‘Legal Obligation in Hume’, Hume Studies, 7, pp.85-93 129
8 Gerald J.Postema （1988）, ‘Hume’s Reply to the Sensible Knave’, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 5, pp.23-40 139
9 Jason Baldwin （2004）, ‘ Hume’s Knave and the Interests of Justice’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 42, pp.277-96 157
Content and Scope of Justice 179
10 Russell Hardin （2005）, ‘From Order to Justice’, Politics, Philosophy, and Economics, 4, pp.175-94 179
11 Alistair Macleod （1981）, ‘Rule-Utilitarianism and Hume’s Theory of Justice’, Hume Studies, 7, pp.74-84 199
12 Arthur Kuflik （1998）, ‘Hume on Justice to Animals, Indians and Women’, Hume Studies, 24, pp.53-70 205
PART Ⅲ PROPERTY 225
13 George E.Panichas （1983）, ‘Hume’s Theory of Property’, Archive for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, 69, pp.391-405 225
14 Christopher J.Bertty （1980）, ‘Property and Possession: Two Replies to Locke - Hume and Hegel’, Nomos, 22, pp.89-100 241
15 Jeremy Waldron （1994）, ‘The Advantages and Difficulties of the Humean Theoryof Property’, Social Philosophy and Policy, pp.85-123 253
PART Ⅳ CONTRACT: PROMISES 295
16 G.E.M.Anscombe （1978）, ‘Rules, Rights, and Promises’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 3, pp.318-23 295
17 Annette Baier （2010）, ‘Promises, Promises, Promises’, in The Cautious Jealous Virtue: Hume on Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp.163-99 301
PART Ⅴ LAW AND GOVERNMENT: INCLUDING SOCIAL CONTRACT 341
18 Jeffrie G.Murphy （1978）, ‘Hume and Kant on the Social Contract’, Philosophical Studies, 33, pp.65-79 341
19 Frederick G.Whelan （1994）, ‘Hume and Contractarianism’, Polity, 27, pp.201-24 357
20 Rachel Cohon （2001）, ‘The Shackles of Virtue: Hume on Allegiance to Government’, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 18, pp.393-413 381
21 R.J.Glossop （1984）, ‘Hume and the Future of the Society of Nations’, Hume Studies, 10, pp.46-58 403
PART Ⅵ LIBERTY 419
22 Nicholas Capaldi, （1990）, ‘The Preservation of Liberty’, in N.Capaldi and D.W.Livingston （eds）, Liberty in Hume’s History of England, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp.195-224 419
PART Ⅶ CAUSATION 451
23 H.L.A.Hart and Tony Honore （1985）, ‘Philosophical Preliminaries’, in Causation in the Law （2nd ed）, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.9-25 451
PART Ⅷ RESPONSIBILITY AND PUNISHMENT 471
24 Michael D.Bayles （1982）, ‘Character, Purpose, and Criminal Responsibility’, Law and Philosophy, 1, pp.5-20 471
25 Paul Russell （1990）, ‘Hume on Responsibility and Punishment’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 20, pp.539-63 487
26 A.Wesley Cragg （1990）, ‘Hume on Punishment’, in T.Campbell （ed.）, Law and Enlightenment in Britain, Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, pp.57-74 513
27 James Allan （1999）, ‘To Exclude or Not to Exclude Improperly Obtained Evidence: Is a Humean Approach More Helpful?’, University of Tasmania Law Review, 18,pp.263-82 531
Name Index 551