PART Ⅰ DEVELOPMENT 3
1 Theodor Meron (1992), ‘Shakespeare’s Henry the Fifth and the Law of War’, American Journal ofInternational Law, 86, pp.1-45. 3
2 Chris af Jochnick and Roger Normand (1994), ‘The Legitimation of Violence: A Critical History of the Laws of War’, Harvard International Law Journal, 35, pp.49-95. 49
3 James W.Garner (1915), ‘Some Questions of International Law in the European War’, American Journal ofInternational Law, 9, pp.72-112. 97
4 Jean S.Pictet (1951), ‘The New Geneva Conventions for the Protection of War Victims’, American Journal of International Law, 45, pp.462-75. 139
5 Josef L.Kunz (1951), ‘The Chaotic Status of the Laws of War and the Urgent Necessity for their Revision’, American Journal ofInternational Law, 45, pp.37-61. 153
6 Josef L.Kunz (1956), ‘The Laws of War’, American Journal of International Law, 50, pp.313-37. 179
7 George H.Aldrich (1986), ‘Progressive Development of the Laws of War: A Reply to Criticisms of the 1977 Geneva Protocol I’, Virginia Journal of International Law, 26, pp.693-720. 205
8 Michael J.Matheson (1987), ‘The United States Position on the Relation of Customary International Law to the 1977 Protocols Additional to the 1949 Geneva Conventions’, American University Journal of International Law and Policy, 2, pp.419-31. 233
9 Dietrich Schindler (2003), ‘International Humanitarian Law: Its Remarkable Development and its Persistent Violation’, Journal of the History of International Law, 5, pp.165-88. 247
10 Yves Sandoz (2003), ‘International Humanitarian Law in the Twenty-First Century’, Yearbook ofInternational Humanitarian Law, 6, pp.3-40. 269
11 Jean-Marie Henckaerts (2005), ‘Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law: A Contribution to the Understanding and Respect for the Rule of Law in Armed Conllict’, International Review of the Red Cross, 87, pp.175-97. 307
PART Ⅱ PRINCIPLES 333
12 Theodor Meron (2000), ‘The Humanization of Humanitarian Law’,American Journal of International Law, 94, pp.239-78. 333
13 Antonio Cassese (2000), ‘The Martens Clause: Half a Loaf or Simply Pie in the Sky?’, European Journal of International Law, 11, pp.187-216. 373
14 Theodor Meron (2000), ‘The Martens Clause, Principles of Humanity, and Dictates of Public Conscience’, American Journal of International Law, 94, pp.78-89. 403
15 Frits Kalshoven (1999), ‘The Undertaking to Respect and Ensure Respect in All Circumstances: From Tiny Seed to Ripening Fruit’, Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, 2, pp.3-61. 415
16 Burrus M.Carnahan (1998), ‘Lincoln, Lieber and the Laws of War: The Origins and Limits of the Principle of Military Necessity’, American Journal of International Law, 92, pp.213-31. 475
17 William Gerald Downey, Jr (1953), ‘The Law of War and Militaty Necessiry’, American Journal of International Law, 47, pp.251-62. 495
18 G.I.A.D.Draper (1973), ‘Militaty Necessity and Humanitarian Imperatives’,Military Law and the Law of War Review, 12, pp.129-51. 507
19 Horace B.Robertson, Jr (1998), ‘The Principle of the Militaty Objective in the Law of Armed Conflict’, in M.N.Schmitt (ed.), The Law of Military Operations, Newport, RI: US Naval War College International Law Studies, pp.197-223. 531
Name Index 559