菲律宾所提南海仲裁案 仲裁庭的裁决没有法律效力PDF电子书下载

菲律宾所提南海仲裁案仲裁庭的裁决没有法律效力 1

一仲裁庭错误认定菲律宾所提诉求构成中菲两国有关《公约》解释或适用的争端 2

二仲裁庭管辖本质上属于领土主权问题的事项，超出了《公约》授权 8

三仲裁庭罔顾中菲之间存在海域划界的事实，曲解《公约》第298条规定，越权管辖与海域划界有关的事项 17

四仲裁庭否定中菲两国存在通过谈判解决相关争端的协议，曲解《公约》第281条规定，错误行使管辖权 24

五仲裁庭错误裁定菲律宾就所提仲裁事项的争端解决方式履行了“交换意见”的义务 29

六仲裁庭有违客观公正，背离了《公约》争端解决机制的目的和宗旨，破坏了《公约》的完整性和权威性 31

菲律宾所提南海仲裁案仲裁庭的裁决没有法律效力（内容概要） 38

The Tribunal' s Award in the “South China Sea Arbitration”Initiated by the Philippines Is Null and Void 46

Ⅰ The Arbitral Tribunal errs in finding that the claims made by the Philippines constitute disputes between China and the Philippines concerning the interpretation or application of the UNCLOS 48

Ⅱ By exercising jurisdiction over subject-matters about terri-torial sovereignty in essence， the Arbitral Tribunal acts ultra vires， beyond the authorization of the UNCLOS 57

Ⅲ The Arbitral Tribunal disregards the fact that there exists an issue of maritime delimitation between China and the Philippines， distorts Article 298 of the UNCLOS， and acts ultra vires to exercise jurisdiction over claims concerning maritime delimitation 70

Ⅳ The Arbitral Tribunal disregards the fact that there exist between China and the Philippines agreements to settle the relevant disputes through negotiation， distorts Article 281 of the UNCLOS， and erroneously exercises jurisdiction over the claims 79

Ⅴ The Arbitral Tribunal errs in finding that the Philippines had fulfilled the obligation to “exchange views” regarding the means of disputes settlement with respect to the claims it made 86

Ⅵ The Arbitral Tribunal is neither objective nor impartial， and its Award deviates from the object and purpose of the dispute settlement mechanism of the UNCLOS and impairs the integrity and authority of the Convention 90

The Tribunal' s Award in the “South China Sea Arbitration”Initiated by the Philippines Is Null and Void （ExecutiveSummary） 99