FREEDOM OF THE PRESSPDF电子书下载

PART Ⅰ PRESS FREEDOM AND FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION 3

1 Potter Stewart （1975）, “‘Or of the Press”’, Hastings Law Journal, 26, pp.631-37. 3

2 Anthony Lewis （1979）, ‘A Preferred Position for Journalism?’, Hofstra Law Review, 7, pp.595-27. 11

3 C.Edwin Baker （2007）, ‘The Independent Significance of the Press Clause under Existing Law’, Hofstra Law Review, 35, pp.955-1026. 45

4 Thomas Gibbons （1992）, ‘Freedom of the Press: Ownership and Editorial Values’, Public Law, 92, pp.279-99. 117

PART Ⅱ SELF-REGULATION OF THE PRESS 141

5 John A.Ritter and Matthew Leibowitz （1974）, ‘Press Councils: The Answer to our First Amendment Dilemma’, Duke Law Journal, pp.845-70. 141

6 Sir Louis Blom-Cooper, QC and Lisa R.Pruitt （1994）, ‘Privacy Jurisprudence of the Press Complaints Commission’, Anglo-American Law Review, 23, pp.133-60. 167

7 Herdis Thorgeirsdottir （2004）, ‘Self-censorship among Journalists: A （Moral） Wrong or a Violation of ECHR Law?’, European Human Rights Law Review, 9, pp.383-99. 195

PART Ⅲ FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AND LIBEL LAW 215

8 David A.Anderson （1975）, ‘Libel and Press Self-Censorship’, Texas Law Review, 53, pp.422-81. 215

9 Adrienne Stone and George Williams, （2000）, ‘Freedom of Speech and Defamation: Developments in the Common Law World’, Monash UniversityLaw Review, 26, pp.362-78. 275

10 Andrew T.Kenyon （2004）, ‘Lange and Reynolds Qualified Privilege: Australian and English Defamation Law and Practice’, Melbourne University Law Review, 28, pp.406-37. 293

PART Ⅳ FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AND PRIVACY 327

11 Melville B.Nimmer （1968）, ‘The Right to Speak from Times to Time: FirstAmendment Theory Applied to Libel and Misapplied to Privacy’, California Law Review, 56, pp.935-67. 327

12 Eric Barendt （1995）, ‘Privacy and the Press’, Yearbook of Media and Entertainment Law, 1, pp.23-41. 361

13 Elizabeth Paton-Simpson （2000）, ‘Privacy and the Reasonable Paranoid: The Protection of Privacy in Public Places’, University of Toronto Law Journal, 50, pp.305-6. 381

14 Paul Gerwitz （2001）, ‘Privacy and Speech’, Supreme Court Review, pp.139-99. 423

15 M.A.Sanderson （2004）, ‘Is Von Hannover v Germany a Step Backward for the Substantive Analysis of Speech and Privacy Interests?’, European Human Rights Law Review, 9, pp.631-4. 485

Name Index 499