PUBLIC CHOICE AND PIBLIC LAWPDF电子书下载

PART Ⅰ INTEREST GROUP THEORIES 3

1.George J.Stigler （1971）, ‘The Theory of Economic Regulation’,Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2 （1）, Spring,3-21 3

2.William M.Landes and Richard A.Posner （1975）, ‘The Independent Judiciary in an Interest-Group Perspective’, Journal of Law and Economics, 18 （3）, December, 875-901 22

3.Einer R.Elhauge （1991）, ‘Does Interest Group Theory Justify More Intrusive Judicial Review?’, Yale Law Journal, 101（1）, October,31-110 49

PART Ⅱ INSTITUTIONALIST AND AGENCY THEORIES 131

4.Tom Ginsburg （2002）, ‘Ways of Criticizing Public Choice: The Uses of Empiricism and Theory in Legal Scholarship’, University of Illinois Law Review, 4, 1139-66 131

5.Keith Krehbiel （2004）, ‘Legislative Organization’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18 （1）, Winter, 113-28 159

6.Daryl J.Levinson （2005）, ‘Empire-Building Government in Constitutional Law’, Harvard Law Review, 118, 916-72 175

PART Ⅲ PUBLIC CHOICE AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW 235

7.Jerry L.Mashaw （1985）, ‘Prodelegation: Why Administrators Should Make Political Decisions’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1（1）, 81-100 235

8.McNollgast （1999）, ‘The Political Origins of the Administrative Procedure Act’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15 （1）,180-217 255

9.Terry M.Moe and William G.Howell （1999）, ‘The Presidential Power of Unilateral Action’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15 （1）, April, 132-79 293

PART Ⅳ PUBLIC CHOICE AND STATUTORY INTERPRETATION 343

10.Frank H.Easterbrook （1983）, ‘Statutes’ Domains’, University of Chicago Law Review, 50 （2）, Spring, 533-52 343

11.William N.Eskridge, Jr.（1988）, ‘Politics Without Romance:Implications of Public Choice Theory for Statutory Interpretation’,Virginia Law Review, 74 （2）, March, 275-338 363

12.Kenneth A.Shepsle （1992）, ‘Congress Is a “They,” Not an “It”:Legislative Intent as Oxymoron’, International Review of Law and Economics, 12 （2）, June, 239-56 427

13.McNollgast （1994）, ‘Legislative Intent: The Use of Positive Political Theory in Statutory Interpretation’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 57 （1）, Winter, 3-37 445

Name Index 481