Theories of JusticePDF电子书下载

PART Ⅰ THEORIZING JUSTICE 3

1 David Miller （2005）, ‘Two Ways to Think About Justice’, Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 1, pp.5-28. 3

2 Amartya Sen （2006）, ‘What Do We Want From a Theory of Justice?’, Journal of Philosophy, 103, pp.215-38. 27

3 Michael Buckley （2010）, ‘The Structure of Justification in Political Constructivism’, Metaphilosophy, 41, pp.669-89. 51

PART Ⅱ JUSTICE AS EQUALITY 75

4 Richard J.Arneson （1989）, ‘Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare’, Philosophical Studies, 56, pp.77-93. 75

5 G.A.Cohen （1989）, ‘On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice’, Ethics, 99, pp.906-44. 93

6 Elizabeth S.Anderson （1999）, ‘What Is the Point of Equality?’, Ethics, 109, pp.287-337. 133

7 Iris Marion Young （2001）, ‘Equality of Whom? Social Groups and Judgments of Injustice’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 9, pp.1-18. 185

PART Ⅲ THE SCOPE OF JUSTICE 205

8 G.A.Cohen （1997）, ‘Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 26, pp.3-30. 205

9 Liam B.Murphy （1998）, ‘Institutions and the Demands of Justice’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 27, pp.251-91. 233

10 Thomas W.Pogge （2000）, ‘On the Site of Distributive Justice: Reflections on Cohen and Murphy’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 29, pp.137-69. 275

PART Ⅳ LEFT-LIBERTARIANISM 311

11 Hillel Steiner （1981）, ‘Liberty and Equality’, Political Studies, 29, pp.555-69. 311

12 Barbara H.Fried （2004）, ‘Left-Libertarianism: A Review Essay’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 32, pp.66-92. 327

13 Peter Vallentyne, Hillel Steiner and Michael Otsuka （2005）, ‘Why Left-Libertarianism Is not Incoherent, Indeterminate, or Irrelevant: A Reply to Fried’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 33, pp.201-15. 355

PART Ⅴ JUSTICE AS DESERT 373

14 Alistair M.MacLeod （2005）, ‘Distributive Justice and Desert’, Journal of Social Philosophy, 36, pp.421-38. 373

15 Samuel Scheffler （2000）, ‘Justice and Desert in Liberal Theory’, California Law Review, 88, pp.965-90. 391

16 Owen McLeod （2003）, ‘On the Comparative Element of Justice’, in Serena Olsaretti （ed.）, Desert and Justice, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp.123-44. 417

17 Shelly Kagan （1999）, ‘Equality and Desert’, in Louis Pojman and Owen McLeod （eds）, What Do We Deserve? A Reader on Justice and Desert, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.298-314. 439

PART Ⅵ FEMINISTS AND OTHER CRITICS 459

18 T.D.Campbell （1974）, ‘Humanity before Justice’, British Journal of Political Science, 4, pp.1-16. 459

19 Susan Moller Okin （1987）, ‘Justice and Gender’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 16, pp.42-72. 475

20 Anca Gheaus （2009）, ‘The Challenge of Care to Idealizing Theories of Distributive Justice’, in Lisa Tessman （ed.）, Feminist Ethics and Social and Political Philosophy: Theorizing the Non-Ideal, New York: Springer, pp.105-19. 507

21 Kai Nielsen （1989）, ‘Liberal and Socialist Egalitarianism’, Journal of Social Philosophy, 20, pp.137-54. 523

PART Ⅶ IDEAL AND NON-IDEAL JUSTICE 543

22 Colin Farrelly （2007）, ‘Justice in Ideal Theory: A Refutation’, Political Studies, 55, pp.844-64. 543

23 Charles W.Mills （2004）, “‘Ideal Theory” as Ideology’, in Peggy DesAutels and Margaret Urban Walker （eds）, Moral Psychology: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory, Oxford: Rowan & Littlefield, pp.163-82. 565

24 Zofia Stemplowska （2008）, ‘What’s Ideal About Ideal Theory?’, Social Theory and Practice, 34, pp.319-40. 585

Index 607