THE RIGHT OF HOT PURSUIT IN INTERNATIONAL LAW SECOND EDITIONPDF电子书下载

INTRODUCTION 1

1.General 1

2.Historical Origin of Hot Pursuit 4

Part one THE RIGHT OF HOT PURSUIT ON LAND 11

1.General-International Treaties 11

2.The United States-Mexican Border Incidents 13

3.Communist Aggression Against Greece(1946-1949) 17

4.The Korean Conflict(1950-1953) 17

5.The Hungarian-Austrian Border Incidents(1956-1957). 20

6.The Algerian War of Independence 20

7.The Israeli-Jordanian Border Incident of November 13,1966 22

8.The Israeli-Jordanian Border Incident of April 8,1968 23

9.The Question of the Mercenaries and the Democratic Republic of Congo(1967-1968) 26

10.The present Vietnam Conflict 27

Part two THE RIGHT OF HOT PURSUIT IN THE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE SEA 39

INTRODUCTORY 39

A.LEGAL CONCEPT AND SOURCES 42

CHAPTER Ⅰ.LEGAL CONCEPT 42

CHAPTER Ⅱ.SOURCES 46

Section Ⅰ.Codification-International Treaties 46

Codification Efforts 46

1.Private Codification Efforts 46

2.Official Codification Efforts 48

a) The Hague Codification Conference 49

b) The Geneva Conference on the Law of the Sea 54

International Treaties 57

1.Multilateral Treaties 57

a) Convention for the Suppression of the Contraband Traffic in Alcoholic Liquors 57

b) Treaty on International Penal Law 58

2.Bilateral Treaties 59

Section Ⅱ.Select Case-Law 62

I.International Arbitral Awards 63

a) The I'm Alone case 63

b) The Itata case 68

c) Arbitral Awards by Asser 69

Ⅱ.Judgments Rendered by Municipal Courts 71

1.Cases Connected With the Theory of Constructive Presence 71

Simple Constructive Presence 71

a) The Araunah case 71

b) The Tenyu Maru case 71

c) The Grace and Ruby case 73

Extensive Constructive Presence 74

a) The Henry L.Marshall case 74

b) The Marion L.Mosher case 76

c) The Marjorie E.Bachman and other cases 78

2.Other Cases of Hot Pursuit 79

Hot Pursuit Commencing in Territorial Waters 79

a) The North case 79

b) The Ernest and Prosper Everaert case and others. 81

c) The Fudge v.The King case 83

Hot Pursuit Commencing Within a Limit Set Up For Certain Particular Purposes by a Treaty or Unilaterally 84

a) The Vinces case 84

b) The Newton Bay case 85

c) The Katina case 87

d) The Onassis case and others 89

e) The Incidents of the Tonkin Gulf of 1964 91

Section Ⅲ.National Legislation 93

1.American Continent 94

a) The United States of America 94

b) Canada 101

c) Colombia 103

2.Europe 103

a) The United Kingdom 103

b) The U.S.S.R 107

c) Belgium 109

d) Yugoslavia 109

e) Bulgaria 110

f) Greece 110

g) Denmark 110

3.African Continent 111

a) Egypt 111

4.Asia 112

a) Israel 112

b) China 112

c) Ceylon 113

d) Turkey 114

e) South Vietnam 115

5.Oceania 116

a) New Zealand 116

Section Ⅳ.The Teachings of Publicists 118

Ⅰ.Authors Accepting the Right of Hot Pursuit 119

Ⅱ.Authors Accepting the Right of Hot Pursuit only Under Certain Strict Conditions 125

Ⅲ.Authors Against the Right of Hot Pursuit 126

B.ANALYSIS OF THE RIGHT OF HOT PURSUIT 129

CHAPTER Ⅲ.PREREQUISITES OF THE RIGHT OF HOT PURSUIT 129

Section I.Acts and Offences Giving Right to Hot Pursuit 129

1.The Nature of Acts and Offences Entitling the Coastal State to Hot Pursuit 129

2.Seriousness of the Offence 135

a) General 135

b) Hot Pursuit Arising out of Oil Pollution or the Release of Radioactive Waste 137

3.Acts and Offences Entitling Coastal States to Hot Pursuit During Innocent Passage 141

a) Lateral Passage 141

i.Criminal Jurisdiction of the Coastal State 146

ii.Civil Jurisdiction of the Coastal State 150

b) Vertical Passage 151

4.Is Hot Pursuit Permitted in Case of an Attempted Offence,of Suspicion,or in Case of an Offence Committed by Negligence? 154

Section Ⅱ.The Area of Hot Pursuit 158

1.Hot Pursuit Starting in the Internal Waters,Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone of the Coastal State 158

2.Hot Pursuit Starting from Within Adjacent Zones-Other than the Contiguous Zone-Established for Certain Special Purposes 167

a) The Question of Hot Pursuit Starting on the Continental Shelf 167

b) The Question of Hot Pursuit Starting in Adjacent Zones Established for Fishing or Conservation Purposes 177

3.The Outer Limit of Hot Pursuit 187

Section Ⅲ.Craft Entitled to the Right of Hot Pursuit 192

Section Ⅳ.Position of the Vessels and other Prerequisites for the Commencement of Hot Pursuit 198

1.Simultaneous Presence of the Vessels in the Same Zone 198

2.Location of the Infringing Vessel 199

3.The Signal to Stop 204

CHAPTER Ⅳ.PROCEDURE OF HOT PURSUIT 208

Section I.Immediate Commencement and Non-Interruption of Hot Pursuit 208

1.Immediacy of Hot Pursuit 208

2.Continuity of Hot Pursuit 210

Section Ⅱ.Hot Pursuit of an Infringing Vessel by Aircraft 215

Section Ⅲ.Hot Pursuit by Relays 223

Section Ⅳ.Conclusion of Hot Pursuit 227

1.Cessation of Hot Pursuit 227

2.May Hot Pursuit Be Resumed After Cessation? 229

3.Termination of Hot Pursuit 233

4.Notification to the Flag State 237

C.SOME PROBLEMS CONNECTED WITH THE RIGHT OF HOT PURSUIT 239

CHAPTER Ⅴ.ESCORT OF AN ARRESTED VESSEL ACROSS THE HIGH SEAS 239

CHAPTER Ⅵ.THE DOCTRINE OF CONSTRUCTIVE PRESENCE 243

CHAPTER Ⅶ.INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND THE RIGHT OF HOT PURSUIT 252

1.General 252

2.Legal Basis of State Responsibility Arising out of Hot Pursuit 255

3.Circumstances Involving the Responsibility of the Coastal State in the Event of a Hot Pursuit 257

4.Conditions for Espousing a Claim Arising out of an Unjustified Hot Pursuit 259

a) General 259

b) Nationality of Claims 260

c) The Rule of Exhaustion of Local Remedies 262

d) The Doctrine of Clean Hands 264

5.Legal Consequences of State Responsibility 264

6.A Possible Compulsory Settlement of Disputes Arising out of Hot Pursuit 266

Part Three THE RIGHT OF HOT PURSUIT IN INTERNATIONAL AIR LAW 271

CHAPTER Ⅰ.GENERAL-LEGAL CONCEPT 271

CHAPTER Ⅱ.SOURCES 283

Section Ⅰ.National Legislation 283

1.European Continent 284

a) Greece 284

b) The U.S.S.R 287

c) Bulgaria 290

2.American Continent 291

a) The United States of America 291

b) Colombia 293

3.Asia 294

a) Ceylon 294

4.African Continent 295

a) Egypt 295

5.Oceania 296

a) Australia 296

Section Ⅱ.International Treaties 298

1.The Geneva Conventions on the Law of the Sea(1958) 298

2.The Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation(1944) 305

Section Ⅲ.State Practice 313

Ⅰ.State Practice During the Period of the Cold War 314

1.Aerial Incidents Before the I.C.J 314

a) Aerial Incident of October 7,1952 316

b) Aerial Incident of September 4,1954 318

c) Aerial Incident of November 7,1954 320

d) Aerial Incident of March 10,1953 321

2.Aerial Incidents Before the Security Council of the United Nations 322

a) Aerial Incident of July 1,1960 323

3.Aerial Incidents Which Resulted in Only an Exchange of Diplomatic Notes 325

a) Aerial Incident of February 16,1953 325

b) Aerial Incident of June 23,1959 326

c) Aerial Incident of February 1963 328

Ⅱ.State Practice During Armed Conflicts Not Amounting to War 329

1.The Korean Conflict(1950-1953) 331

2.The Present Vietnam Conflict 333

CHAPTER Ⅲ.THE AREA OF AERIAL HOT PURSUIT 339

CONCLUSION 346

1.The Three Dimensions of the Right of Hot Pursuit in International Law 346

2.The Right of Hot Pursuit as an Institution to Serve International Legal Order 347

3.The Right of Hot Pursuit in Future.Proposals 350

BIBLIOGRAPHY 353

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 381

TABLE OF CASES 389

INDEX 395