Media freedom and contempt of courtPDF电子书下载

PART Ⅰ THE OPEN JUSTICE PRINCIPLE 3

1 The Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin, PC （2003）, ‘Courts, Transparency and Public Confidence - To the Better Administration of Justice’, Deakin Law Review, 8, pp.1-11. 3

2 The Honourable J.J.Spigelman, AC （2006）, ‘The Principle of Open Justice:A Comparative Perspective’, University of New South Wales Law Journal, 29,pp.147-66. 15

3 Anthony Lewis （1980）, ‘A Public Right to Know about Public Institutions:The First Amendment as Sword’, Supreme Court Review, pp.1-25. 35

4 Roderick Munday （1991）, ‘Name Suppression: An Adjunct to the Presumption of Innocence and to Mitigation of Sentence - Parts 1 and 2’, Criminal Law Review,pp.680-88, 753-62. 61

5 Ian Cram （1998）, ‘Automatic Reporting Restrictions in Criminal Proceedings and Article 10 of the ECHR, European Human Rights Law Review, 3, pp.742-53. 81

6 David A.Anderson （1995）, ‘Democracy and the Demystification of Courts:An Essay’, The Review ofLitigation, 14, pp.627-57. 93

PART Ⅱ CAMERAS IN THE COURT-ROOM 125

7 Martin Dockray （1988）, ‘Courts on Television’, The Modern Law Review, 51,pp.593-604. 125

8 M.David Lepofsky （1996）, ‘Cameras in the Courtroom -Not Without My Consent’, National Journal of Constitutional Law, 6, pp.161-232. 137

9 Daniel Stepniak （2003）, ‘A Comparative Analysis of First Amendment Rights and the Televising of Court Proceedings’, Idaho Law Review, 40, pp.315-49. 209

PART Ⅲ PREJUDICIAL MEDIA PUBLICITY 247

10 Stephen J.Krause （1996）, ‘Punishing the Press: Using Contempt of Court to Secure the Right to a Fair Trial’, Boston University Law Review, 76, pp.537-74. 247

11 Joanne Armstrong Brandwood （2000）, ‘You Say “Fair Trial” and I Say “Free Press”:British and American Approaches to Protecting Defendants’ Rights in High Profile Trials’, New York University Law Review, 75, pp.1412-51. 285

12 David Corker and Michael Levi （1996）, ‘Pre-trial Publicity and its Treatment in the English Courts’, Criminal Law Review, pp.622-32. 325

13 Clive Walker （1996）, ‘Fundamental Rights, Fair Trials and the New Audio-Visual Sector’, The Modern Law Review, 59, pp.517-39. 337

14 T.M.Honess, S.Barker, E.A.Charman and M.Levi （2002）, ‘Empirical and Legal Perspectives on the Impact of Pre-trial Publicity’, Criminal Law Review, pp.719-27. 361

PART Ⅳ JOURNALISTS’ PRIVILEGE NOT TO REVEAL SOURCES 373

15 Stephanie Palmer （1992）, ‘Protecting Journalists’ Sources: Section 10, Contempt of Court Act 1981’, Public Law, 61, pp.61-72. 373

16 William E.Lee （2006）, ‘The Priestly Class: Reflections on a Journalist’s Privilege’, Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, 23, pp.635-86. 385

17 Janice Brabyn （2006）, ‘Protection Against Judicially Compelled Disclosure of the Identity of News Gatherers’ Confidential Sources in Common Law Jurisdictions’,The Modern Law Review, 69, pp.895-934. 437

Name Index 477