Criminal Law ConversationsPDF电子书下载

Ⅰ.PRINCIPLES 3

Chapter 1.Decision Rules and Conduct Rules: On Acoustic Separation in Criminal Law&MEIR DAN-COHEN 3

Comments: 12

Kyron Huigens—Duress Is Never a Conduct Rule 12

Samuel W.Buell—Decision Rules as Notice: The Case of Fraud 13

Anne M.Coughlin—Of Decision Rules and Conduct Rules, or Doing the Police in Different Voices 15

Luis Duarte d'Almeida—Separation, But Not of Rules 17

Adil Ahmad Haque—The Constitutive Function of Criminal Law 19

Eric J.Miller—Are There Two Types of Decision Rules? 20

Malcolm Thorburn—A Liberal Criminal Law Cannot Be Reduced to These Two Types of Rules 22

Reply: 24

Meir Dan-Cohen 24

Chapter 2.Empirical Desert&PAUL H.ROBINSON 29

Comments: 39

Mary Sigler—The False Promise of Empirical Desert 39

Adam J.Kolber—Compliance-Promoting Intuitions 41

Michael T.Cahill—A Fertile Desert? 43

Alice Ristroph—The New Desert 45

Youngjae Lee—Keeping Desert Honest 49

Matthew Lister—Desert: Empirical, Not Metaphysical 51

Alice Ristroph—Response to Lee and Lister 53

Joseph E.Kennedy—Empirical Desert and the Endpoints of Punishment 54

Andrew E.Taslitz—Empirical Desert: The Yin and Yang of Criminal Justice 56

Adil Ahmad Haque—Legitimacy as Strategy 57

Laura I Appleman—Sentencing, Empirical Desert, and Restorative Justice 59

Reply: 61

Paul H.Robinson 61

Chapter 3.Defending Preventive Detention&CHRISTOPHER SLOBOGIN 67

Comments: 75

Michael Louis Corrado—Slobogin on Dehumanization 75

Michael Marcus—Don't Abandon Sentencing Reform to Defend Preventive Detention 78

Rinat Kitai-Sangero—The Presumption of Innocence versus Preventive Detention 80

Matt Matravers—Unreliability, Innocence, and Preventive Detention 81

Joseph E.Kennedy—The Dangers of Dangerousness as a Basis for Incarceration 83

Reply: 84

Christopher Slobogin 84

Chapter 4.The Economics of Crime Control&DORON TEICHMAN 87

Comments: 93

Russell D.Covey—The Limits of the Economic Model: Becker's Crime and Punishment 93

Alon Harel—The Economic Analysis of Crime Control: A Friendly Critique 95

Keith N.Hylton—Efficient Deterrence and Crime Control 97

Morris B.Hoffman—Law, Economics, and Neuroethical Realism 100

Reply: 101

Doron Teichman 101

Chapter 5.The Difficulties of Deterrence as a Distributive Principle&PAUL H.ROBINSON 105

Comments: 116

Russell D.Covey—Deterrence's Complexity 116

Douglas A.Berman—Making Deterrence Work Better 118

Doron Teichman—In Defense of Deterrence 120

Jonathan S.Masur, Richard H.McAdams, and Thomas J.Miles—For General Deterrence 122

Reply: 124

Paul H.Robinson 124

Chapter 6.Why Only the State May Inflict Criminal Sanctions: The Case Against Privately Inflicted Sanctions&ALON HAREL 129

Comments: 137

Miriam Baer—Eliminating the Divide Between the State and Its Citizens 137

Doron Teichman—Why the State May Delegate the Infliction of Criminal Sanctions 139

Malcolm Thorburn—Why Only the State May Decide When Sanctions Are Appropriate 140

Stuart P.Green—Why Do Privately Inflicted Criminal Sanctions Matter? 142

Reply: 144

Alon Harel 144

Chapter 7.Results Don't Matter&LARRY ALEXANDER AND KIMBERLY KESSLER FERZAN 147

Comments: 153

Gerald Leonard—Some Reasons Why Criminal Harms Matter 153

Peter Westen—Why Criminal Harms Matter 155

Thomas Morawetz—Results Don't Matter, But... 157

Jeremy Horder—On the Reducibility of Crimes 159

Reply: 160

Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan 160

Chapter 8.Post-Modern Meditations on Punishment: On the Limits of Reason and the Virtue of Randomization&BERNARD E.HARCOURT 163

Comments: 173

Alice Ristroph—Games Punishers Play 173

Michael M.O'Hear—Chance's Domain 175

Alon Harel—The Lure of Ambivalent Skepticism 177

Ken Levy—Punishment Must Be Justified Or Not at All 179

Reply: 181

Bernard E.Harcourt 181

Chapter 9.Remorse, Apology, and Mercy&JEFFRIE G.MURPHY 185

Comments: 195

Sherry F.Colb—Retaining Remorse 195

Stephanos Bibas—Invasions of Conscience and Faked Apologies 196

Susan A.Bandes—Evaluation of Remorse Is Here to Stay: We Should Focus on Improving Its Dynamics 198

Lisa Kern Griffin—Insincere and Involuntary Public Apologies 199

Janet Ainsworth—The Social Meaning of Apology 201

Reply: 203

Jeffrie G.Murphy 203

Chapter 10.Interpretive Construction in the Substantive Criminal Law&MARK KELMAN 207

Comments: 218

Paul Litton—Unexplained, False Assumptions Underlie Kelman's Skepticism 218

John Mikhail—Unconscious Choices in Legal Analysis 220

Margaret Raymond—Interpretive Constructions and the Exercise of Bias 222

Alice Ristroph—Interpretive Construction and Defensive Punishment Theory 224

Reply: 226

Mark Kelman 226

Chapter 11.Criminalization and Sharing Wrongs&S.E.MARSHALL AND R.A.DUFF 229

Comments: 238

Stuart P.Green—Sharing Wrongs Between Criminal and Civil Sanctions 238

Shlomit Wallerstein—Victim, Beware! On the Dangers of Sharing Wrongs with Society 240

Adil Ahmad Haque—Sharing the Burdens of Justice 241

Matthew Lister—Contractualism and the Sharing of Wrongs 243

Michelle Madden Dempsey—Sharing Reasons for Criminalization? No Thanks...Already Got ‘Em! 245

Andrew E.Taslitz—Public versus Private Retribution and Delegated Revenge 247

Reply: 248

S.E.Marshall and R.A.Duff 248

Chapter 12.Monstrous Offenders and the Search for Solidari Through Modern Punishment 253

Comments: 262

Marianne Wesson—Domesticated Monsters 262

Janet Ainsworth—“We Have Met the Enemy and He Is Us”: Cognitive Bias and Perceptions of Threat 264

Douglas A.Berman—Have Good Intentions Also Fueled the Severity Revolution? 266

Reply: 268

Joseph E.Kennedy 268

Ⅱ.DOCTRINE 273

Chapter 13.Against Negligence Liability&LARRY ALEXANDER AND KIMBERLY KESSLER FERZAN 273

Comments: 281

Leo Zaibert—For Negligence Liability 281

Michelle Madden Dempsey—The Object of Criminal Responsibility 283

Alan Brudner—Is Negligence Blameless? 285

Stephen P.Garvey—Fatally Circular? Not! 286

Andrew E.Taslitz—Cognitive Science and Contextual Negligence Liability 288

Kenneth W.Simons—The Distinction Between Negligence and Recklessness Is Unstable 290

Reply: 291

Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan 291

Chapter 14.Rape Law Reform Based on Negotiation: Beyond the No and Yes Models&MICHELLE J.ANDERSON 295

Comments: 305

Andrew E.Taslitz—Self-Deception and Rape Law Reform 305

Kimberly Kessler Ferzan—Sex as Contract 308

Robin Charlow—Negotiating Sex: Would It Work? 310

Sherry F.Colb—Conversation Before Penetration? 312

Marianne Wesson—You Can't Get Away from Consent 313

Reply: 314

Michelle J.Anderson 314

Chapter 15.Provocation: Explaining and Justifying the Defense in Partial Excuse, Loss of Self-Control Terms&JOSHUA DRESSLER 319

Comments: 326

Susan D.Rozelle—He Had It Coming: Provocation as a Partial Justification 326

Vera Bergelson—Provocation: Not Just a Partial Excuse 328

Marcia Baron—Reframing the Issues: Differing Views of Justification and the Feminist Critique of Provocation 329

Joan H.Krause—Tolerating the Loss of Self-Control 331

Kenneth Simons—Excuse Doctrine Should Eschew Both the Reasonable and the Ordinary Person 333

Stephen P.Garvey—Get Rid of Adequate Provocation! 335

Marianne Wesson—Enforcing Virtue with the Law of Homicide 336

Reply: 338

Joshua Dressler 338

Chapter 16.Objective Versus Subjective Justification: A Case Study in Function and Form in Constructing a System of Criminal Law Theory&PAUL H.ROBINSON 343

Comments: 354

Peter Westen—A Platonic Justification for “Unknowing Justification” 354

Shlomit Wallerstein—The Third, Combined, Theory for Justifications 356

Mitchell N.Berman—In Defense of Subjective Justifications 357

John Mikhail—Constraining the Necessity Defense 359

Reply: 361

Paul H.Robinson 361

Chapter 17.Self-Defense and the Psychotic Aggressor&GEORGE P.FLETCHER AND LUIS E.CHIESA 365

Comments: 372

Boaz Sangero—“Self-Defense and the Psychotic Aggressor”: What About Proportionality? 372

John Mikhail—Self-Defense Against Wrongful Attack: The Case of the Psychotic Aggressor 374

Sherry F.Colb—Justifying Homicide Against Innocent Aggressors Without Denying Their Innocence 375

Shlomit Wallerstein—Two Flaws in the Autonomy-Based Justification for Self-Defense 377

Whitley R.P.Kaufman—Problems for the Autonomy Theory of Self-Defense 379

Reply: 380

George P.Fletcher and Luis E.Chiesa 380

Chapter 18.Self-Defense Against Morally Innocent Threats&JEFF MCMAHAN 385

Comments: 395

Adil Ahmad Haque—Rights and Liabilities at War 395

Shlomit Wallerstein—Why Causal Responsibility Matters 396

Kimberly Kessler Ferzan—Can't Sue; Can Kill 398

Whitley R.P.Kaufman—Can “Moral Responsibility” Explain Self-Defense? 400

Victor Tadros—Doubts About the Responsibility Principle 402

Reply: 404

Jeff McMahan 404

Chapter 19.Self-Defense, Imminence, and the Battered Woman&WHITLEY R.P.KAUFMAN 407

Comments: 415

Gideon Yaffe—The Real Link Between Imminence and Necessity 415

Marcia Baron—In Defense of the Proxy Thesis 417

Kimberly Kessler Ferzan—The Values and Costs of Imminence 419

Joan H.Krause—Imminence Reconsidered: Are Battered Women Different? 420

Jeremy Horder—The “Imminence” Requirement, Battered Women, and the Authority to Strike Back 422

Reply: 424

Whitley R.P.Kaufman 424

Chapter 20.Reasonable Provocation and Self-Defense: Recognizing the Distinction Between Act Reasonableness and Emotion Reasonableness&CYNTHIA LEE 427

Comments: 432

Susan D.Rozelle—Making Waves: Radicalizing Act Reasonableness 432

Carissa Byrne Hessick—Is an Act Reasonableness Inquiry Necessary? 434

Terry A.Maroney—Differentiating Cognitive and Volitional Aspects of Emotion in Self-Defense and Provocation 436

Caroline Forell—Norms, Proportionality, Provocation, and Imperfect Self-Defense 438

Jeremy Horder—Different Ways to Manifest Reasonableness 440

Kenneth W.Simons—Requiring Reasonable Beliefs About Self-Defense Ensures that Acts Conforming to Those Beliefs Are Reasonable 441

Reply: 443

Cynthia Lee 443

Chapter 21.Against Control Tests for Criminal Responsibility&STEPHEN J.MORSE 449

Comments: 460

Stephen P.Garvey—The Folk Psychology of Self-ContrOl 460

Michael Louis Corrado—Morse on Control Tests 461

Susan D.Rozelle—Sometimes a Control Test Is Just a Control Test 463

Terry A.Maroney—Why Is a Folk-Psychological Account of Loss of Control Necessary (And What Precisely Is It)? 465

Robert F.Schopp—Cognition, Rationality, and Responsibility 467

Reply: 469

Stephen J.Morse 469

Chapter 22.Abolition of the Insanity Defense&CHRISTOPHER SLOBOGIN 473

Comments: 482

Susan D.Rozelle—No Excuse for You 482

Sherry F.Colb—Not By Cognition Alone 484

Paul Litton—Against Integrationism 486

Matt Matravers—Justifying Defenses 488

Reply: 489

Christopher Slobogin 489

Chapter 23.Entrapment and the “Free Market” for Crime&LOUIS MICHAEL SEIDMAN 493

Comments: 503

Sherry F.Colb—Making Sense of Entrapment Law After the Death of Lochner 503

Miriam Baer—Entrapment and the Quandary of the Undercover Investigation 505

Bruce Hay—An Enforcement Policy Perspective on Entrapment 507

Richard H.McAdams—The Entrapment Defense Defended 509

Reply: 512

Louis Michael Seidman 512

Ⅲ.ADMINISTRATION 517

Chapter 24.The Political Economy of Criminal Law and Procedure: The Pessimists' View&RICHARD H.MCADAMS 517

Comments: 528

Darryl K.Brown—The Enduring Pattern of Broad Criminal Codes and a Path for Structural Change 528

Samuel W.Buell—The Sources of Overbreadth 530

Joseph E.Kennedy—Why Here and Why Now? Bringing History and Sociology to Bear on Punitive Pathology 532

Andrew E.Taslitz—The Political Economy of Prosecutorial Indiscretion 533

Rachel E.Barkow—An Ounce of Prevention: Realistic Treatment for Our Pathological Politics 535

Ronald F.Wright—Prosecutor Elections and Overdepth in Criminal Codes 537

Reply: 539

Richard H.McAdams 539

Chapter 25.Against Jury Nullification&ANDREW D.LEIPOLD 543

Comments: 551

Richard H.McAdams—Jury Nullification Checks Prosecutorial Power 551

Carol S.Steiker—Sculpting the Shape of Nullification Through Jury Information and Instruction 553

Sherry F.Colb—Jury Nullification and Erroneous Acquittals: Getting the Causation Backwards 554

Josh Bowers—Accuracy and Legitimacy 556

Reply: 558

Andrew D.Leipold 558

Chapter 26.Race-Based Jury Nullification: Black Power in the Criminal Justice System&PAUL BUTLER 561

Comments: 569

Lawrence Rosenthal—Confusing Cause and Effect 569

Robin Charlow—The Effect of Race-Based Jury Nullification on Batson 572

LaJuana Davis—The Pernicious Myth of Racial Jury Nullification 574

Sherry F.Colb—Rejecting Racial Jury Nullification 575

Bennett Capers—On Racially-Based Jury Nullification 576

Josh Bowers—Grand-Jury Nullification: Black Power in the Charging Decision 578

Reply: 580

Paul Butler 580

Chapter 27.In Support of Restorative Justice&ERIK LUNA 585

Comments: 595

Stephanos Bibas—Restoration, But Also More Justice 595

David Dolinko—Restorative Caveats 597

Margareth Etienne—Restoring Justice Through Individualized Processes 599

Joseph E.Kennedy—Restore to What? Supplementing Restorative Justice 601

Michael M.O'Hear—Dangers of the Big Tent 602

Robert Weisberg—Luna-Inspired Speculations on Restorative Justice 604

Reply: 606

Erik Luna 606

Chapter 28.The Virtues of Offense/Offender Distinctions&DOUGLAS A.BERMAN 611

Comments: 622

Richard E.Myers Ⅱ—From Each According to His Ability 622

Adam J.Kolber—Characteristics Related to Punishment Experience 623

Nancy Gertner—Offense/Offender Distinction and Competence 625

Laura I Appleman—Splitting the Baby: The Danger of Distinguishing Between Offense and Offender Characteristics 627

Joseph E.Kennedy—Blakely, Booker, Accountability, and Intelligibility 629

Margareth Etienne—In Need of a Theory of Mitigation 630

Reply: 632

Douglas A.Berman 632

Chapter 29.The Heart Has Its Reasons: Examining the Strange Persistence of the American Death Penalty&SUSAN A.BANDES 635

Comments: 643

Douglas A.Berman and Stephanos Bibas—The Heart Has Its Value: The Death Penalty's Justifiable Persistence 643

Mary Sigler—Emotions, Retributivism and the Death Penalty 645

Jeffrie G.Murphy—When Clearly Understood, Retributive Theory Has Much To Offer 647

Robert F.Schopp—Reason and Emotion in Capital Sentencing 649

Joseph E.Kennedy—Outrage Versus Anger and Hatred 651

Carol S.Steiker—Will Empathy Kill the Death Penalty, or Vice Versa? 652

LaJuana Davis—Overriding Emotion 654

Terry A.Maroney—Can the Theory and Practice of Capital Punishment Be More Emotionally Intelligent? 656

Reply: 658

Susan A.Bandes 658

Chapter 30.Mercy's Decline and Administrative Law's Ascendance&RACHEL E.BARKOW 663

Comments: 673

Ronald F.Wright and Marc L.Miller—Subjective and Objective Discretion of Prosecutors 673

Douglas A.Berman—Mercy's Disguise, Prosecutorial Power, and Equality's Modern Construction 675

Stephanos Bibas—Political versus Administrative Justice 677

Andrew E.Taslitz—The Decline of Criminal Law Representative Populism 679

Reply: 681

Rachel E.Barkow 681

Chapter 31.Criminal Law Comes Home&JEANNIE SUK 683

Comments: 692

Melissa Murray—The Private Life of Criminal Law 692

Laura A.Rosenbury—Whose Privacy? 694

Aya Gruber—From Neoliberalism to Libertarianism: Why Neither Criminalization Nor Privacy Is the Answer for Battered Women 696

Jennifer Collins—Criminal Law Comes Home to a Family 698

Cheryl Hanna—Because Breaking Up Is Hard To Do 700

Emily J.Sack—The Crime of Domestic Violence 702

Deborah Tuerkheimer—Domesticating Criminal Law: A Normative Defense 704

Alafair Burke—Domestic Violence Misdemeanor Prosecutions and the New Policing 705

Reply: 707

Jeannie Suk 707

Index 713