Ⅰ.PRINCIPLES 3
Chapter 1.Decision Rules and Conduct Rules: On Acoustic Separation in Criminal Law&MEIR DAN-COHEN 3
Comments: 12
Kyron Huigens—Duress Is Never a Conduct Rule 12
Samuel W.Buell—Decision Rules as Notice: The Case of Fraud 13
Anne M.Coughlin—Of Decision Rules and Conduct Rules, or Doing the Police in Different Voices 15
Luis Duarte d'Almeida—Separation, But Not of Rules 17
Adil Ahmad Haque—The Constitutive Function of Criminal Law 19
Eric J.Miller—Are There Two Types of Decision Rules? 20
Malcolm Thorburn—A Liberal Criminal Law Cannot Be Reduced to These Two Types of Rules 22
Reply: 24
Meir Dan-Cohen 24
Chapter 2.Empirical Desert&PAUL H.ROBINSON 29
Comments: 39
Mary Sigler—The False Promise of Empirical Desert 39
Adam J.Kolber—Compliance-Promoting Intuitions 41
Michael T.Cahill—A Fertile Desert? 43
Alice Ristroph—The New Desert 45
Youngjae Lee—Keeping Desert Honest 49
Matthew Lister—Desert: Empirical, Not Metaphysical 51
Alice Ristroph—Response to Lee and Lister 53
Joseph E.Kennedy—Empirical Desert and the Endpoints of Punishment 54
Andrew E.Taslitz—Empirical Desert: The Yin and Yang of Criminal Justice 56
Adil Ahmad Haque—Legitimacy as Strategy 57
Laura I Appleman—Sentencing, Empirical Desert, and Restorative Justice 59
Reply: 61
Paul H.Robinson 61
Chapter 3.Defending Preventive Detention&CHRISTOPHER SLOBOGIN 67
Comments: 75
Michael Louis Corrado—Slobogin on Dehumanization 75
Michael Marcus—Don't Abandon Sentencing Reform to Defend Preventive Detention 78
Rinat Kitai-Sangero—The Presumption of Innocence versus Preventive Detention 80
Matt Matravers—Unreliability, Innocence, and Preventive Detention 81
Joseph E.Kennedy—The Dangers of Dangerousness as a Basis for Incarceration 83
Reply: 84
Christopher Slobogin 84
Chapter 4.The Economics of Crime Control&DORON TEICHMAN 87
Comments: 93
Russell D.Covey—The Limits of the Economic Model: Becker's Crime and Punishment 93
Alon Harel—The Economic Analysis of Crime Control: A Friendly Critique 95
Keith N.Hylton—Efficient Deterrence and Crime Control 97
Morris B.Hoffman—Law, Economics, and Neuroethical Realism 100
Reply: 101
Doron Teichman 101
Chapter 5.The Difficulties of Deterrence as a Distributive Principle&PAUL H.ROBINSON 105
Comments: 116
Russell D.Covey—Deterrence's Complexity 116
Douglas A.Berman—Making Deterrence Work Better 118
Doron Teichman—In Defense of Deterrence 120
Jonathan S.Masur, Richard H.McAdams, and Thomas J.Miles—For General Deterrence 122
Reply: 124
Paul H.Robinson 124
Chapter 6.Why Only the State May Inflict Criminal Sanctions: The Case Against Privately Inflicted Sanctions&ALON HAREL 129
Comments: 137
Miriam Baer—Eliminating the Divide Between the State and Its Citizens 137
Doron Teichman—Why the State May Delegate the Infliction of Criminal Sanctions 139
Malcolm Thorburn—Why Only the State May Decide When Sanctions Are Appropriate 140
Stuart P.Green—Why Do Privately Inflicted Criminal Sanctions Matter? 142
Reply: 144
Alon Harel 144
Chapter 7.Results Don't Matter&LARRY ALEXANDER AND KIMBERLY KESSLER FERZAN 147
Comments: 153
Gerald Leonard—Some Reasons Why Criminal Harms Matter 153
Peter Westen—Why Criminal Harms Matter 155
Thomas Morawetz—Results Don't Matter, But... 157
Jeremy Horder—On the Reducibility of Crimes 159
Reply: 160
Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan 160
Chapter 8.Post-Modern Meditations on Punishment: On the Limits of Reason and the Virtue of Randomization&BERNARD E.HARCOURT 163
Comments: 173
Alice Ristroph—Games Punishers Play 173
Michael M.O'Hear—Chance's Domain 175
Alon Harel—The Lure of Ambivalent Skepticism 177
Ken Levy—Punishment Must Be Justified Or Not at All 179
Reply: 181
Bernard E.Harcourt 181
Chapter 9.Remorse, Apology, and Mercy&JEFFRIE G.MURPHY 185
Comments: 195
Sherry F.Colb—Retaining Remorse 195
Stephanos Bibas—Invasions of Conscience and Faked Apologies 196
Susan A.Bandes—Evaluation of Remorse Is Here to Stay: We Should Focus on Improving Its Dynamics 198
Lisa Kern Griffin—Insincere and Involuntary Public Apologies 199
Janet Ainsworth—The Social Meaning of Apology 201
Reply: 203
Jeffrie G.Murphy 203
Chapter 10.Interpretive Construction in the Substantive Criminal Law&MARK KELMAN 207
Comments: 218
Paul Litton—Unexplained, False Assumptions Underlie Kelman's Skepticism 218
John Mikhail—Unconscious Choices in Legal Analysis 220
Margaret Raymond—Interpretive Constructions and the Exercise of Bias 222
Alice Ristroph—Interpretive Construction and Defensive Punishment Theory 224
Reply: 226
Mark Kelman 226
Chapter 11.Criminalization and Sharing Wrongs&S.E.MARSHALL AND R.A.DUFF 229
Comments: 238
Stuart P.Green—Sharing Wrongs Between Criminal and Civil Sanctions 238
Shlomit Wallerstein—Victim, Beware! On the Dangers of Sharing Wrongs with Society 240
Adil Ahmad Haque—Sharing the Burdens of Justice 241
Matthew Lister—Contractualism and the Sharing of Wrongs 243
Michelle Madden Dempsey—Sharing Reasons for Criminalization? No Thanks...Already Got ‘Em! 245
Andrew E.Taslitz—Public versus Private Retribution and Delegated Revenge 247
Reply: 248
S.E.Marshall and R.A.Duff 248
Chapter 12.Monstrous Offenders and the Search for Solidari Through Modern Punishment 253
Comments: 262
Marianne Wesson—Domesticated Monsters 262
Janet Ainsworth—“We Have Met the Enemy and He Is Us”: Cognitive Bias and Perceptions of Threat 264
Douglas A.Berman—Have Good Intentions Also Fueled the Severity Revolution? 266
Reply: 268
Joseph E.Kennedy 268
Ⅱ.DOCTRINE 273
Chapter 13.Against Negligence Liability&LARRY ALEXANDER AND KIMBERLY KESSLER FERZAN 273
Comments: 281
Leo Zaibert—For Negligence Liability 281
Michelle Madden Dempsey—The Object of Criminal Responsibility 283
Alan Brudner—Is Negligence Blameless? 285
Stephen P.Garvey—Fatally Circular? Not! 286
Andrew E.Taslitz—Cognitive Science and Contextual Negligence Liability 288
Kenneth W.Simons—The Distinction Between Negligence and Recklessness Is Unstable 290
Reply: 291
Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan 291
Chapter 14.Rape Law Reform Based on Negotiation: Beyond the No and Yes Models&MICHELLE J.ANDERSON 295
Comments: 305
Andrew E.Taslitz—Self-Deception and Rape Law Reform 305
Kimberly Kessler Ferzan—Sex as Contract 308
Robin Charlow—Negotiating Sex: Would It Work? 310
Sherry F.Colb—Conversation Before Penetration? 312
Marianne Wesson—You Can't Get Away from Consent 313
Reply: 314
Michelle J.Anderson 314
Chapter 15.Provocation: Explaining and Justifying the Defense in Partial Excuse, Loss of Self-Control Terms&JOSHUA DRESSLER 319
Comments: 326
Susan D.Rozelle—He Had It Coming: Provocation as a Partial Justification 326
Vera Bergelson—Provocation: Not Just a Partial Excuse 328
Marcia Baron—Reframing the Issues: Differing Views of Justification and the Feminist Critique of Provocation 329
Joan H.Krause—Tolerating the Loss of Self-Control 331
Kenneth Simons—Excuse Doctrine Should Eschew Both the Reasonable and the Ordinary Person 333
Stephen P.Garvey—Get Rid of Adequate Provocation! 335
Marianne Wesson—Enforcing Virtue with the Law of Homicide 336
Reply: 338
Joshua Dressler 338
Chapter 16.Objective Versus Subjective Justification: A Case Study in Function and Form in Constructing a System of Criminal Law Theory&PAUL H.ROBINSON 343
Comments: 354
Peter Westen—A Platonic Justification for “Unknowing Justification” 354
Shlomit Wallerstein—The Third, Combined, Theory for Justifications 356
Mitchell N.Berman—In Defense of Subjective Justifications 357
John Mikhail—Constraining the Necessity Defense 359
Reply: 361
Paul H.Robinson 361
Chapter 17.Self-Defense and the Psychotic Aggressor&GEORGE P.FLETCHER AND LUIS E.CHIESA 365
Comments: 372
Boaz Sangero—“Self-Defense and the Psychotic Aggressor”: What About Proportionality? 372
John Mikhail—Self-Defense Against Wrongful Attack: The Case of the Psychotic Aggressor 374
Sherry F.Colb—Justifying Homicide Against Innocent Aggressors Without Denying Their Innocence 375
Shlomit Wallerstein—Two Flaws in the Autonomy-Based Justification for Self-Defense 377
Whitley R.P.Kaufman—Problems for the Autonomy Theory of Self-Defense 379
Reply: 380
George P.Fletcher and Luis E.Chiesa 380
Chapter 18.Self-Defense Against Morally Innocent Threats&JEFF MCMAHAN 385
Comments: 395
Adil Ahmad Haque—Rights and Liabilities at War 395
Shlomit Wallerstein—Why Causal Responsibility Matters 396
Kimberly Kessler Ferzan—Can't Sue; Can Kill 398
Whitley R.P.Kaufman—Can “Moral Responsibility” Explain Self-Defense? 400
Victor Tadros—Doubts About the Responsibility Principle 402
Reply: 404
Jeff McMahan 404
Chapter 19.Self-Defense, Imminence, and the Battered Woman&WHITLEY R.P.KAUFMAN 407
Comments: 415
Gideon Yaffe—The Real Link Between Imminence and Necessity 415
Marcia Baron—In Defense of the Proxy Thesis 417
Kimberly Kessler Ferzan—The Values and Costs of Imminence 419
Joan H.Krause—Imminence Reconsidered: Are Battered Women Different? 420
Jeremy Horder—The “Imminence” Requirement, Battered Women, and the Authority to Strike Back 422
Reply: 424
Whitley R.P.Kaufman 424
Chapter 20.Reasonable Provocation and Self-Defense: Recognizing the Distinction Between Act Reasonableness and Emotion Reasonableness&CYNTHIA LEE 427
Comments: 432
Susan D.Rozelle—Making Waves: Radicalizing Act Reasonableness 432
Carissa Byrne Hessick—Is an Act Reasonableness Inquiry Necessary? 434
Terry A.Maroney—Differentiating Cognitive and Volitional Aspects of Emotion in Self-Defense and Provocation 436
Caroline Forell—Norms, Proportionality, Provocation, and Imperfect Self-Defense 438
Jeremy Horder—Different Ways to Manifest Reasonableness 440
Kenneth W.Simons—Requiring Reasonable Beliefs About Self-Defense Ensures that Acts Conforming to Those Beliefs Are Reasonable 441
Reply: 443
Cynthia Lee 443
Chapter 21.Against Control Tests for Criminal Responsibility&STEPHEN J.MORSE 449
Comments: 460
Stephen P.Garvey—The Folk Psychology of Self-ContrOl 460
Michael Louis Corrado—Morse on Control Tests 461
Susan D.Rozelle—Sometimes a Control Test Is Just a Control Test 463
Terry A.Maroney—Why Is a Folk-Psychological Account of Loss of Control Necessary (And What Precisely Is It)? 465
Robert F.Schopp—Cognition, Rationality, and Responsibility 467
Reply: 469
Stephen J.Morse 469
Chapter 22.Abolition of the Insanity Defense&CHRISTOPHER SLOBOGIN 473
Comments: 482
Susan D.Rozelle—No Excuse for You 482
Sherry F.Colb—Not By Cognition Alone 484
Paul Litton—Against Integrationism 486
Matt Matravers—Justifying Defenses 488
Reply: 489
Christopher Slobogin 489
Chapter 23.Entrapment and the “Free Market” for Crime&LOUIS MICHAEL SEIDMAN 493
Comments: 503
Sherry F.Colb—Making Sense of Entrapment Law After the Death of Lochner 503
Miriam Baer—Entrapment and the Quandary of the Undercover Investigation 505
Bruce Hay—An Enforcement Policy Perspective on Entrapment 507
Richard H.McAdams—The Entrapment Defense Defended 509
Reply: 512
Louis Michael Seidman 512
Ⅲ.ADMINISTRATION 517
Chapter 24.The Political Economy of Criminal Law and Procedure: The Pessimists' View&RICHARD H.MCADAMS 517
Comments: 528
Darryl K.Brown—The Enduring Pattern of Broad Criminal Codes and a Path for Structural Change 528
Samuel W.Buell—The Sources of Overbreadth 530
Joseph E.Kennedy—Why Here and Why Now? Bringing History and Sociology to Bear on Punitive Pathology 532
Andrew E.Taslitz—The Political Economy of Prosecutorial Indiscretion 533
Rachel E.Barkow—An Ounce of Prevention: Realistic Treatment for Our Pathological Politics 535
Ronald F.Wright—Prosecutor Elections and Overdepth in Criminal Codes 537
Reply: 539
Richard H.McAdams 539
Chapter 25.Against Jury Nullification&ANDREW D.LEIPOLD 543
Comments: 551
Richard H.McAdams—Jury Nullification Checks Prosecutorial Power 551
Carol S.Steiker—Sculpting the Shape of Nullification Through Jury Information and Instruction 553
Sherry F.Colb—Jury Nullification and Erroneous Acquittals: Getting the Causation Backwards 554
Josh Bowers—Accuracy and Legitimacy 556
Reply: 558
Andrew D.Leipold 558
Chapter 26.Race-Based Jury Nullification: Black Power in the Criminal Justice System&PAUL BUTLER 561
Comments: 569
Lawrence Rosenthal—Confusing Cause and Effect 569
Robin Charlow—The Effect of Race-Based Jury Nullification on Batson 572
LaJuana Davis—The Pernicious Myth of Racial Jury Nullification 574
Sherry F.Colb—Rejecting Racial Jury Nullification 575
Bennett Capers—On Racially-Based Jury Nullification 576
Josh Bowers—Grand-Jury Nullification: Black Power in the Charging Decision 578
Reply: 580
Paul Butler 580
Chapter 27.In Support of Restorative Justice&ERIK LUNA 585
Comments: 595
Stephanos Bibas—Restoration, But Also More Justice 595
David Dolinko—Restorative Caveats 597
Margareth Etienne—Restoring Justice Through Individualized Processes 599
Joseph E.Kennedy—Restore to What? Supplementing Restorative Justice 601
Michael M.O'Hear—Dangers of the Big Tent 602
Robert Weisberg—Luna-Inspired Speculations on Restorative Justice 604
Reply: 606
Erik Luna 606
Chapter 28.The Virtues of Offense/Offender Distinctions&DOUGLAS A.BERMAN 611
Comments: 622
Richard E.Myers Ⅱ—From Each According to His Ability 622
Adam J.Kolber—Characteristics Related to Punishment Experience 623
Nancy Gertner—Offense/Offender Distinction and Competence 625
Laura I Appleman—Splitting the Baby: The Danger of Distinguishing Between Offense and Offender Characteristics 627
Joseph E.Kennedy—Blakely, Booker, Accountability, and Intelligibility 629
Margareth Etienne—In Need of a Theory of Mitigation 630
Reply: 632
Douglas A.Berman 632
Chapter 29.The Heart Has Its Reasons: Examining the Strange Persistence of the American Death Penalty&SUSAN A.BANDES 635
Comments: 643
Douglas A.Berman and Stephanos Bibas—The Heart Has Its Value: The Death Penalty's Justifiable Persistence 643
Mary Sigler—Emotions, Retributivism and the Death Penalty 645
Jeffrie G.Murphy—When Clearly Understood, Retributive Theory Has Much To Offer 647
Robert F.Schopp—Reason and Emotion in Capital Sentencing 649
Joseph E.Kennedy—Outrage Versus Anger and Hatred 651
Carol S.Steiker—Will Empathy Kill the Death Penalty, or Vice Versa? 652
LaJuana Davis—Overriding Emotion 654
Terry A.Maroney—Can the Theory and Practice of Capital Punishment Be More Emotionally Intelligent? 656
Reply: 658
Susan A.Bandes 658
Chapter 30.Mercy's Decline and Administrative Law's Ascendance&RACHEL E.BARKOW 663
Comments: 673
Ronald F.Wright and Marc L.Miller—Subjective and Objective Discretion of Prosecutors 673
Douglas A.Berman—Mercy's Disguise, Prosecutorial Power, and Equality's Modern Construction 675
Stephanos Bibas—Political versus Administrative Justice 677
Andrew E.Taslitz—The Decline of Criminal Law Representative Populism 679
Reply: 681
Rachel E.Barkow 681
Chapter 31.Criminal Law Comes Home&JEANNIE SUK 683
Comments: 692
Melissa Murray—The Private Life of Criminal Law 692
Laura A.Rosenbury—Whose Privacy? 694
Aya Gruber—From Neoliberalism to Libertarianism: Why Neither Criminalization Nor Privacy Is the Answer for Battered Women 696
Jennifer Collins—Criminal Law Comes Home to a Family 698
Cheryl Hanna—Because Breaking Up Is Hard To Do 700
Emily J.Sack—The Crime of Domestic Violence 702
Deborah Tuerkheimer—Domesticating Criminal Law: A Normative Defense 704
Alafair Burke—Domestic Violence Misdemeanor Prosecutions and the New Policing 705
Reply: 707
Jeannie Suk 707
Index 713