1.引言 1
1.1.代理的定义及基础 1
Ireland v Livingston (1872) 4
1.2.代理与其他交易的区别 5
1.3.能力 6
Doe d Thomas v Roberts(1847) 7
Zouch v Parsons(1765) 7
个案判例表 11
1.4.谁的代理人 14
Shephard v Cartwright(1953) 18
Bevan v Webb(1901) 18
Colland v Lloyd(1840) 18
Bolus Co Ltd v Inglis Bros Ltd(1924) 18
Robinson v Mollett(1874) 18
Doyle v White City Stadium Ltd(1935) 18
Brown Gracie Ltd v Green(FW) Co(1960) 18
G(A) v G(T)(1970) 18
Drew v Nunn(1879) 18
Downie Bros v Henry Oakley Sons(1923) 18
Butlers(London) Ltd v Roope Co(1922) 18
McLaughlin v Darcy(1918) 18
Golden City Theatre Ltd Re(1954) 18
Mackinlay v Bathurst(1919) 18
Bateman v Mid·Wales Railway Co(1866) 18
R v Longnor(1833) 18
Imperial Loan Company Ltd v Stone(1892) 19
Hunter v Parker(1840) 19
Daily Telegraph Newspaper Co v Mclaughlin(1904) 19
Taylor v Walker(1958) 19
Gibbons v Wright(1953) 19
Whelpdale s Case(1604) 19
Mack v Royal Bank of Canada(1931) 19
Royal Bank v Mack(1932) 19
已婚人士地位条例(一九七二年修订版，第一百八十二章) Married Persons Status Ordinance (Cap 182 of the Revised Edition 1972) 19
Hong Chi Mui v Tong Ching Co(1964) 20
Jebara v Ottoman Bank(1927) 20
Pidgeon v Burslem(1849) 20
Jessopp v Lutwyche(1854) 20
Phoenix General Insurance Co of Greece SA v Halvanon Insurance Co Ltd(1985) 20
Cope v Rowlands(1836) 20
Commonwealth Trust Co v Dewitt(1973) 20
Bird v Boulter(1833) 20
Smith v Lindo(1858) 20
Stewart v Oriental Fire Marine Insurance Co Ltd(1985) 20
Bedford Insurance Co Ltd v Instituto de Resseguros do Brasil(1984) 20
Kuenigl v Donnersmarck(1955) 20
Stevenson (Hugh) and Sons v Aktiengesellschaft fur Carton Nagen Industrie(1918) 20
Boston Deep Sea Fishing Ice Co Ltd v Farnham(1957) 20
Farebother v Simmons(1882) 20
Singh v Ali(1960) 20
De Mattos v Benjamin(1894) 20
Hawkins v Kemp(1803) 21
Chu Yen Estates Ltd v Ho Sau-Ki(1976) 21
Clauss v Pir(1987) 21
Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Pools Finance(1937)Ltd(1952) 21
Gosling v Gaskell(1897) 21
Yeung Kai Yung(Stanley) v Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corpn(1981) 21
Tennant v London County Council(1957) 21
Newsholme Bros v Road Transport General Insurance Co(1929) 21
Blucher(prince),Re,Ex p Debtor(1931) 21
Stone v Reliance Mutual Insurance Society Ltd(1972) 21
Branwhite v Worcester Works Finance Co Ltd(1969) 21
Financings Ltd v Stimson(1962) 21
Sorrell v Finch(1976) 21
London County Council v Agricultural Food Products Ltd(1955) 21
Hine Brothers v The Steamship Insurance Syndicate Ltd(1895) 22
Manchester Trust v Furness(1895) 22
Bart v British West Indian Airways Ltd(1967) 22
2.1.明文协议 23
2.协定代理 23
2.2.暗示协议 23
Megevand,Re,Ex p Delhasse(1878) 26
第二(1)条 28
第五(1)条 28
2.3.协议形式 28
授权书条例(一九八七年修订版，第三十一章) Power of Attorney Ordinance (Cap 31 of the Revised Edition 1987) 28
Pole v Leask(1863) 29
Freeman Lockyer v Buckhurst Park Properties(Mangal) Ltd(1964) 29
Ruggles v American Central Insurance Co of St Louis(1889) 29
Little v Spreadbury(1910) 29
Moore v Peachey(1891) 29
Ashford Shire Council v Dependable Motors Pty Ltd(1961) 29
Chatenay(M) v The Brazilian Submarine Telegraph Co Ltd(1891) 29
Garnac Grain Co Inc v Faure(HMF) Fairclough Ltd(1968) 29
Hutchings v Nunes(1863) 29
Roberts v Ogilby(1821) 29
Lord v Hall(1849) 30
Berkeley v Hardy(1856) 30
Marchant v Morton,Down Co(1901) 30
Ball v Dunsterville(1791) 30
Hibblewhite v M Morine(1840) 30
Kennedy v De Trafford(1897) 30
第二十六条 30
Burgis v Constantine(1908) 30
Heard v Pilley(1869) 30
Windsor Refrigerator Co Ltd v Branch Nominees Ltd(1961) 30
Garnac Grain Co Inc v Faure(HMF) Fairclough Ltd(1966) 30
3.追认代理 31
3.1.谁可追认 32
Keighley Maxsted Co v Durant(1901) 32
3.2.甚么可以追认 37
Harrisons Crossfield Ltd v London and North Western Railway(1917) 41
Commercial Banking Co of Sydney v Mann(1961) 43
Mercantile Bank of India Ltd v Chartered Bank of India(1937) 43
Union Bank of Australia v McClintock(1922) 43
3.3.何时追认 45
3.4.怎样追认 47
Kidderminster(Mayor of ) v Hardwick(1873) 47
Bolton Partners v Lambert(1888) 47
Crampsey v Deveney(1969) 50
3.5.追认的后果 51
Firth v Staines(1897) 54
Wilson v Tumman(1843) 54
Dibbins v Dibbins(1896) 54
Bird v Brown(1850) 54
第三十二A(1)条 55
Ashbury Railway Carriage and Iron Co v Riche(1875) 55
Spiro v Lintern(1973) 55
Irvine v Union Bank of Australia(1877) 55
Tiedmann and Ledermann Freres,Re(1899) 55
Newborne v Sensolid(Great Britain)Ltd(1954) 55
Soames v Spencer(1822) 55
Barclays Bank Ltd v Roberts(1954) 55
Watson v Swann(1862) 55
Kelner v Baxter(1866) 55
Danish Mercantile Co Ltd v Beaumont(1951) 56
Banque Jacques-Cartier,La v La Banque d Epargne de Montreal(1887) 56
De Bussche v Alt(1878) 56
Brook v Hook(1871) 56
Fitzmaurice v Bayley(1856) 56
Watson v Davies(1931) 56
Marsh v Keating(1834) 56
Marsh v Joseph(1897) 56
Spackman v Evans(1868) 56
Eastern Counties Railway Co Richardson v Broom(1851) 57
Wilson v Poulter(1724) 57
Keay v Fenwick(1876) 57
Bristow v Whitmore(1861) 57
Buron v Denman(1848) 57
Brewer v Sparrow(1827) 57
Hilbery v Hatton(1864) 57
Hull v Pickersgill(1819) 57
Peru(Republic of) v Peruvian Guano Co(1887) 57
R v Dring(1857) 57
R v Woodward(1862) 57
Mawcon Ltd,Re(1969) 57
Rowe v Nominees(B R) pty Ltd(1964) 57
Midland Bank Ltd v Reckitt(1933) 58
Kinsella v Hamilton(1890) 58
Candian Laboratory Supplies Ltd v En.gelhard Industries of Canada(1979) 58
Doe d Mann v Walters(1830) 58
Canadian Laboratory Supplies Ltd v Engelhard Industries of Canada(1977) 58
McEvoy v Belfast Banking Co,The(1935) 59
Portuguese Consolidated Copper Mines Ltd,Re(1890) 59
Metropolitan Asylums Board v Kingham Son(1890) 59
Refugee Assurance Co Ltd v Kettlewell(1909) 59
Forman Co Proprietary Ltd v The Ship Liddesdale (1900) 59
Hooper v Kerr Stuart Co Ltd(1901) 59
Cornwal v Wilson(1750) 59
Becket,Re, Purnell v Paine(1918) 59
London Colonial Co,Re,Ex p Clark(1869) 59
Walter v James(1871) 59
Koenigsblatt v Sweet(1923) 60
Sheridan v Higgins(1971) 60
McKenzie v British Linen Company(1881) 60
Phillips v Homfray(1871) 60
City Bank of Sydney v McLaughlin(1909) 60
Bigg v Strong(1858) 60
Robinson v Gleadow(1835) 60
Bank Melli Iran v Barclays Bank(Dominion,Colonial Overseas)(1951) 60
Comber v Anderson(1808) 60
Fung Kai Sun v Chan Fui Hing(1951) 60
Ho Tung v Man On Insurance Company(1902) 60
Reuter v Electric Telegraph Co,The(1856) 60
Prince v Clark(1823) 60
Simpson v Eggington(1855) 60
Maclean v Dunn(1828) 61
Great Atlantic Insurance Co v Home Insurance Co(1981) 61
Mineworkers Union v Brodick(1948) 61
Lawson v Hosemaster Co Ltd(1966) 61
Oxford(Mayor,Alderman and Citizens of) v Crow(1893) 61
Fleming v Bank of New Zealand(1900) 62
Warehousing and Forwarding Co of East Africa Ltd v Jafferali Sons(1964) 62
4.1.不容否认代理是甚么 63
4.不容否认代理 63
4.2.声明 65
Farquaharson Brothers Co v C King Co(1902) 68
Armagas Ltd v Mundogas SA,The Ocean Frost(1986) 71
Egyptian International Foreign Trade Co v Soplex Wholesale Supplies Ltd, The Raffaella(1985) 72
British Bank of the Middle East v Sun Life Assurance Co of Canada(UK) Ltd(1983) 75
4.3.依赖 76
Rama Corpn Ltd v Proved Tin General Investments Ltd(1952) 78
4.4.损害 78
4.5.不得提出不容否认 78
Todd v Robinson(1825) 80
Hopgood v Brown(1955) 80
Whitechurch(George) Ltd v Cavanagh(1902) 80
Moorgate Mercantile Co Ltd v Twitchings(1976) 80
4.6.不容否认的后果 80
Lloyd v Grace,Smith Co(1912) 81
Hely·Hutchinson v Brayhead Ltd(1968) 81
Summers v Solomon(1857) 81
Greenwood v Martins Bank(1933) 81
Richardson v Cartwright(1844) 81
Bradford Sons v Price Brothers(1923) 81
Inland Revenue Commissioners v Ufitec Group Ltd(1977) 81
International Sponge Importers Ltd v Andrew Watt Sons(1911) 81
Wright v Glyn(1902) 81
Yung Woon Cheung v Mok Cheung(1961) 81
Crabb v Arun District Council(1976) 81
London Joint Stock Bank v MacMillan and Arthur(1918) 82
Mercantile Credit Co Ltd v Hamblin(1965) 82
Attorney General for Ceylon v Silva(AD)(1953) 82
Cypress Disposal Ltd v Inland Sales Ltd(1975) 82
Swan v The North British Australasian Co Ltd(1863) 82
Union Credit Bank v Mersey Docks Harbour Board(1899) 82
Jensen v South Trail Mobile Ltd(1972) 82
Welch v Bank of England(1955) 82
Crabtree-Vickers Pty Ltd v Australian Direct Mail Advertising and Addressing Co Pty Ltd(1975) 83
Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis v Charles(1977) 83
Miles v Mcllwraith(1883) 84
Colonial Bank v Cady and Williams(1890) 84
Woodhouse Ltd v Nigerian Product Ltd(1972) 84
Smith v Prosser(1907) 84
Gompetz v Cook(1904) 84
Perry V Holl(1860) 84
Clarke,Re,The Debtor v Aston Son Ltd(1967) 84
Russo-Chinese Bank Ltd v Li Yau Sam(1910) 84
Porter v Moore(1904) 84
Dao Heng Bank Ltd v Hui Kwai-wing(1977) 84
Bloomenthal v Ford(1897) 84
Jacobs v Morris(1902) 85
Lloyds Bank Ltd v Chartered Bank of India,Australia and China, The(1929) 85
Underwood(AL) Ltd v Bank of Liverpool(1924) 85
Lowe v Bouverie(1891) 85
Danby v Coutts Co(1885) 85
Overbrooke Estates Ltd v Glencombe Properties Ltd(1974) 85
5.法律自动构成的代理 87
5.2.一般的为形势所迫的代理原则？ 87
5.1.妻子 87
5.3.为形势所迫的代理的要素 89
Hastings v Seamans Village(1946) 91
Hawtayne v Bourne(1841) 91
Sachs v Miklos(1948) 91
Great Northern Railway Co v Swaffield(1874) 91
China Pacific SA v Food Corpn of India, The Winson(1981) 91
条例表(汉英对照) 91
Prager v Blatspiel,Stamp Heacock Ltd(1924) 91
Lapraik v Burrows,The Australia(1859) 92
Australian Steam Navigation Co v Morse(1872) 92
Munro v Willmot(1949) 92
Sims Co v Midland Railway Co(1913) 92
Springer v Great Western Railway Co(1921) 92
Tronson v Dent(1853) 92
6.代理人的权力 93
6.1.实有权力 94
6.2.表面权力 104
条例表(英汉对照) 104
Watteau v Fenwick(1893) 106
6.4.代理本质势力 106
6.3.法律自动赐予的权力 106
Edmunds v Bushell(1865) 107
缩写 107
Bryant, Powis Bryant v La Banque du Peuple(1893) 111
Boden v French(1851) 111
Howard v Baillie(1796) 111
Chan Pak Mo v Standard Chartered Asia Ltd(1987) 111
International Paper Co v Spicer(1906) 111
Dowson Jenkins Contract,Re(1904) 111
Jonmenjoy Loondoo v Watson(1884) 111
European Asian Bank v Punjab Sind Bank(1893) 111
Attwood v Munnings(1827) 111
第七条 111
Ching Mei Bo v Lai Yuen Wah(1957) 112
Benmag Ltd v Barda(1955) 112
Palgrave Brown Son Ltd v SS Turid(1922) 112
Cunliffe-Owcn v Teather Greenwood(1967) 112
Helyear v Hawkes(1803) 112
Bank of New South Wales v Owston(1879) 112
Wiltshire v Sims(1808) 112
London Export Corp Ltd v Jubilee Coffee Roasting Co Ltd(1958) 112
Keen v Mear(1920) 112
Harker v Edwards(1887) 112
Neilson v James(1882) 112
Woodin v Burford(1834) 112
Mullens v Miller(1882) 112
Hamer v Sharp(1874) 112
Abrahams v Spitz(1963) 112
Rosenbaum v Belson(1900) 112
Bowring v Shepherd(1871) 112
Thuman v Best(1907) 112
Lacey v Hill(1874) 112
Daun v Simmins(1879) 113
Australian Bank of Commerce v Perel(1926) 113
Banbury v Bank of Montreal(1919) 113
Bank of Montreal v Young(1966) 113
Killick Co v Price(WR) Co(1896) 113
Rhodian River Shipping Co SA v Halla Maritime Corp,The Rhodian River(1984) 114
Kinahan Co Ltd v parry(1910) 114
McLaughlin v Gentles(1920) 114
Lloyds Bank Ltd v Swiss Bankverein(1912) 114
Johnston v Reading(1893) 114
Hubbard v Tenbrook(1889) 115
7.代理人对委讬人的义务 117
7.1.履行的义务 117
Smith v Lascelles(1788) 118
Junior Books Ltd v Veitchi Ltd(1983) 119
Callander v Oelrichs(1838) 119
Anns v Merton London Borough(1978) 119
Hood v West End Motor Car Packing Co(1917) 119
Hougland v RR Low(Luxury Coaches) Ltd(1962) 125
7.2.受讬信义的义务 131
Phipps v Boardman(1967) 133
Keech v Sandford(1726) 140
Canadian Aero Service Ltd v O Malley(1973) 142
Regal(Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver(1967) 142
防止贿赂条例(一九八七年修订版，第二百零一章) Prevention of Bribery and Corrupt Practices Ordinance(Cap 201 of the Revised Edition 1987) 148
第九条 148
Printers Finishers Ltd v Holloway(1965) 150
Industrial Development Consultants v Cooley(1972) 157
Boston Deep Sea Fishing Ice Co v Ansell(1888) 158
Hippisley v Knee Brothers(1905) 158
Demerara Bauxite Co v Louisa Hubbard(1923) 159
7.3.行政义务 161
起诉期限条例(一九八六年修订版，第三百四十九章) Limitation Ordinance(Cap 347 of the Revised Edition 1986) 167
7.4.次代理人 167
第四(2)条 167
第二十(1)条 167
Balsamo v Medici(1984) 170
Baring v Corrie(1818) 171
Cooke Sons v Eshelby(1887) 171
Yuen Kun-yen v Attorney General of Hong Kong(1988) 174
Norwest Refrigeration v Bain Dawes(1984) 174
Coggs v Bernard(1703) 174
Curran v Northern Ireland Housing(1987) 174
Leigh and Sillavan Ltd v Aliakmon Ltd(1986) 174
Corlett v Gordon(1813) 174
Candlewood Corpn v Mitsui Ltd(1986) I AC I 174
D F Estates v Church Commissioners(1988) 174
Gomer v Pitt Scott(1922) 174
London Borough of Bromley v Ellis(1971) 174
Peabody Fund v Sir Linday Parkinson Ltd(1985) 174
Elsee v Gatward(1793) 174
Cohen v Kittell(1889) 174
Morten v Hilton Gibbes Smith(1937) 175
Boyce v Rendells(1983) 175
Bexwell v Christie(1776) 175
Moore v Mourgue(1776) 175
Bertram v Godfray(1830) 175
Deacon (RH) Co Ltd v Varga(1974) 175
Fray v Voules(1859) 175
Andrew Master Hones Ltd v Cruickshank(1979) 175
Commonwealth Portland Cement Co Ltd v Weber Lohmann Co Ltd (1905) 176
Argyll(Duchess of) v Beuselinck(1972) 176
Brogden, Re,Billing v Brogden(1888) 176
Hart v Frame(1839) 176
Beal v The South Devon Railway Company(1864) 176
Cock Russell Co v Bray Cibb Co Ltd(1920) 176
Lanphier v Phipos(1838) 176
Wong(Edward) Finance Co Ltd v Johnson Stokes Master(1984) 176
Chaudhry v Prabhakar(1989) 176
Heys v Tindall(1861) 176
Overend Gurney Co v Gibb(1872) 176
Dampskihsselskab Halla v Catsell Co(1928) 176
Carlile Steamship Co v Simpson Spence Young(1926) 176
Learoyd v Whiteley(1887) 176
Pike v Stephens(1848) 176
Lee v Walker(1872) 176
Solomon v Barker(1826) 176
Allam Co v Europa Poster Services Ltd(1968) 177
Capp v Topham(1805) 177
Quebec and Richmond Railraod Co v Quinn(1858) 177
McCann(John) Co v Pow(1974) 177
Henderson v Barnewall(1827) 177
Hillcrest General Leasing Ltd v Guelph Investments Ltd(1971) 177
Ecossaise Steamship Co Ltd v Lloyd,Low Co(1890) 177
London County Council v Hobbis(1886) 177
Solly v Rathbone(1814) 177
Vine v National Dock Labour Board(1957) 177
Catlin v Bell(1815) 177
Solley v Wood(1852) 177
Wray v Kemp(1884) 177
English v Dedham Vale Properties Ltd(1978) 178
Bray v Ford(1896) 178
New Zealand Netherlands Society Oranje Inc v Laurantius Cornelius Kuys(1973) 178
Hall v Hallet(1784) 178
Jirna Ltd v Mister Donut of Canada Ltd(1971) 178
Christie v McCann(1972) 178
Dunne v English(1874) 178
Allison v Clayhills(1907) 178
Coomber,Re,Coomber v Coomber(1911) 178
Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corp(1984) 178
Thompson v Meade(1891) 179
Barber,Re,Burgess v Vinicome(1886) 179
Savery v King(1856) 179
Gray v New Augarita Porcupine Mines Ltd(1952) 179
Delves v Gray(1902) 179
Parker v Mckenna(1874) 179
Williams v Barton(1927) 179
Gates, Re,Arnold v Gates(1933) 179
Tyrell v Bank of London(1862) 179
Coleman v Myers(1977) 179
Crosskill v Bower(1862) 179
Cradock v Piper(1850) 179
Postlethwaite,Re,postlewhwaite v Rickman(1888) 179
Jacobus Marler Estates Lim v Marler(1916) 179
Robinson v Randfontein Est GM Co Ltd(1921) 179
Montesquieu v Sandys(1811) 179
Gillett v Peppercorne(1840) 179
Proctor v Brain(1828) 179
Broughton v Broughton(1855) 179
Clark v Carlon(1860) 179
Williamson v Hine(1891) 179
Gluckstein v Barnes(1900) 179
Sybron Corp v Rochem Ltd(1984) 179
Hill,Re,Claremont v Hill(1934) 179
Christophers v White(1847) 179
Cane v Allen(1814) 179
Armstrong v Jackson(1917) 179
Carter v Palmer(1842) 179
Brown v Inland Revenue Comrs(1965) 180
New Zealand Australian Land Co v Watson(1881) 180
Quistclose Investments Ltd v Rolls Razor Ltd(1970) 180
Shallcross v Oldham(1862) 180
North American Land Timber Co Ltd v Watkins(1904) 180
Imagic v Futuretronics(1983) 180
AB Consolidated Ltd v Europe Strength Food Co Pty Ltd(1978) 180
Shackell v Howe Thornton palmer(1908) 180
R v Hall(1937) 180
Hobday v Peters(No 1)(1860) 180
Gothenburg Commercial Company,Re(1881) 180
Henry v Hammond(1913) 180
Corsellis,Re, Lawton v Elwes(1887) 180
Cotton,Re,Ex p Cooke(1913) 180
Syke s,Re,Sykes v Sykes(1909) 180
Foley v Hill(1848) 180
Luddy s Trustee v Peard(1886) 180
Lees v Nuttall(1829) 180
Robb v Green(1895) 180
Kirkham v Peel(1880) 180
Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd(1980) 181
Luxor(Eastbourne) Ltd v Cooper(1941) 181
Cook v Deeks(1916) 181
Peso Silver Mines Ltd v Cropper(1966) 181
Industries and General Mortgage Co Ltd v Lewis(1949) 182
Blyth Chemicals Ltd v Bushnell(1933) 182
Fitzroy Bessmer Steel etc Co Ltd,Re(1884) 182
Mahesan S/O Thambiah v Malaysia Housing Society(1979) 182
Tarkwa Main Reef(Ltd) v Merton(1903) 182
Thomson,Re,Thomson v Allen(1930) 182
Salford(Mayor etc of) v Lever(1891) 182
Aberdeen Town Council v Aberdeen University(1877) 182
Russell v Austwick(1826) 182
Attorney General v Goddard(1929) 182
Reading v Attorney General(1951) 182
Canadian Oil Works Corp,Re, Hay s Case(1875) 182
Harrington v Victoria Graving Dock Co(1878) 182
Hovenden Sons v Millhoff(1900) 182
Shipway v Broadwood(1899) 182
Grant v The Gold Exploration Development Syndicate Ltd(1900) 183
Jordy v Vanderpump(1920) 183
Keogh v Dalgety Co Ltd(1916) 183
West Jewell Tin Mining Co,Re(1878) 183
Eden v Ridsdales Railway Lamp Lighting Co Ltd(1889) 183
Rowland v Chapman(1901) 183
Baring v Stanton(1876) 183
Copp v Lynch(1882) 183
North Australian Territory Co,Re,Archer s Case(1892) 183
Fraser v Evans(1969) 183
Li Yan-wai,Eric v Genesis Films Ltd(1987) 183
Owen v Trickett(1908) 183
Domestic Services Ltd,Re(1931) 183
Green (E) Son Ltd v Tugham(G) Co(1913) 183
Saltman Engineering Coy Ld v Campbell Engineering Coy Ld (1948) 183
Emma Silver Mining Co v Grant(1879) 183
Albert(Prince) v Strange(1849) 183
Rex Co v CH Muirhead(1927) 183
Coco v Clark(AN)(Engineers)Ltd(1969) 183
Parkdale,The(1897) 183
Pearson s Case(1877) 183
Great Western Insurance Co v Cunliffe(1874) 183
Lewis v Smith(1849) 184
Ansell Rubber Co Pty Ltd v Allied Rubber Industries Pty Ltd(1967) 184
Weld-Blundell v Stephens(1920) 184
Floydd v Cheney(1970) 184
Ashburton(Lord) v Pape(1913) 184
Royal products v Midland Bank(1981) 184
Tournier v National Provincial and Union Bank of England(1924) 184
Attorney General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd(No2)(1989) 184
United Sterling Corp Ltd v Felton(1974) 184
Lyanll v IRC(1971) 184
Harris Trustees Ltd v Power Packing Services Ltd(1970) 184
Cranleigh Precision Engineering Ltd v Bryant(1966) 184
Merrywheather v Moore(1892) 184
Taylor v Blacklow(1836) 184
Evitt v Price(1827) 184
Measures Brothers,Ltd v Measures(1910) 184
Barker v Gibbons(1972) 184
Moody v Cox Hatt(1917) 185
Haslam Hier·Evans,Re(1902) 185
Harrods Ltd v Lemon(1931) 185
Parry·Jones v Law Society(1969) 185
Hunter v Mann(1974) 185
Robertson v Robertson(1924) 185
Len Pugh Real Estate Ltd v Ronvic Construction Co Ltd(1974) 185
L D Associates v Chan Man Chon Mandalena(1987) 185
Stevenson Jordan and Harrison Ltd v Macdonald(1952) 185
Fullwood v Hurley(1928) 185
Lamb v Evans(1893) 185
Richard Ellis Ltd v Van Hong Tuon(1987) 185
Burrell v Burrell s Trustees(1915) 185
North and South Co v Berkeley(1971) 185
Regier v Campbell-Stuart(1939) 186
Hesse v Briant(1856) 186
Selsey(Lord) v Rhoades(1824) 186
James,Ex p (1803) 186
Blackham v Haythorpe(1917) 186
Blair v Martin(1929) 186
Andrews v Mowbray(1807) 186
Holder v Holder(1968) 186
Pisani v Attorney General for Gilbraltar(1874) 186
Gallard,Re,Ex p Gallard(1897) 186
Doughan v MacPherson(1902) 186
Dally v Wonham(1863) 186
Tanti v Carlson(1945) 186
McKenzie v McDonald(1927) 186
Imperial Mercantile Credit Assn v Coleman(1873) 186
Maddeford v Austwick(1826) 186
Bloy s Trust,Re(1849) 186
Imeson v Lister(1920) 186
Oliver v Court(1820) 186
Bennett, Ex p (1805) 186
Sanderson v Walker(1807) 186
Sewell v Agricultural Bank of Western Australia(1930) 186
Chesterfield Boythorpe Colliery Co v Black(1877) 187
Broun v Kennedy(1864) 187
Meinhard v Salmon(1928) 187
Turnbull v Garden(1869) 187
Williams v Stevens(1866) 187
White v Lincoln(1803) 188
Federal Supply and Cold Storage Co v Angehrn Piel(1911) 188
Nordisk Insulin v Beancard(Cl)(1953) 188
Farrar v Farrars Ltd(1880) 188
Chu,Ronald Li-Kai v Chiu, Deacon Te-Ken(1986) 188
Walden Properties Ltd v Beaver Properties Pty Ltd(1973) 188
Boles and British Land Co s Contract, Re(1902) 188
Chedworth(Lord) v Edwards(1802) 188
McMaster v Byrne(1952) 188
Bousfield v Wilson(1846) 189
Hunter v Welsh(1816) 189
Andrew v Robinson(1812) 189
Wilkinson v North Suburban properties Ltd(1959) 189
Nickolson v Knowles(1820) 189
Chantrey Martin v Martin(1953) 189
Leicestershire CC v Faraday (Michael) Partners Ltd(1941) 189
Horsfall,Ex p(1827) 189
Beresford(Lady) v Driver(1851) 189
Gray v Haig(1854) 189
Ellis Ellis,Re(1908) 189
Blaustein v Maltz,Mitchell Co(1937) 189
Wolfe v Findlay(1847) 189
Dadswell v Jacobs(1887) 189
Eames v Hacon(1881) 189
James Co v Chinecrest(1979) 189
Turner v Burkinshaw(1867) 189
Varden v Parker(1798) 189
Burnand, Re, Ex p Baker, Sutton Co(1904) 189
Dale v Sollet(1767) 189
Gibbon v Pease(1905) 189
Anglo·American Asphalt Co Ltd v Crowley Russell Co Ltd(1945) 190
Gething v Keighley(1878) 190
Ovington v Bell(1812) 190
Attenborough v St Katharine s Dock Co(1878) 190
McKellar v Wallace(1853) 190
Parkinson v Hanbury(1867) 190
Hunter v Belcher(1864) 190
Tanner v European Bank(1866) 190
Mozeley v Cowie(1877) 190
Mersey Docks and Harbour Board,Ex p(1899) 190
Jenkins v Gould(1827) 190
Davies,Ex p,Sadler,Re(1881) 190
Siqueira v Noronha(1934) 190
Hardwicke(Lord) v Vernon(1798) 190
Williamson v Barbour(1877) 190
Farquahar v East India Co(1845) 190
East-India Co v Mainston(1676) 190
Beaumont v Boultbee(1802) 191
Schwensen v Ellinger,Heath,Western Co(1949) 191
Coleman v Mellersh(1850) 191
Powell Thomas v Jones(Evan) Co(1905) 191
第二十(2)条 191
Stainton v Carron Company(1857) 191
Morris v Martin (CW) Sons Ltd(1966) 191
Lee Cooper v Jeakins (CH) Sons(1965) 191
Moukatoff v BOAC(1967) 191
Mutual Aid Permanent Benefit Building Society,Re(1883) 192
Robbins v Fennell(1847) 192
Schmaling v Thomlinson(1815) 192
Chan King Har v Mansion House Securities Ltd(1986) 192
Yau May Yue v Chow Shu Ng(1961) 192
Fisher v Smith(1878) 192
Westwood v Bell(1815) 192
Cairns, Noble Co Ltd v Ashwin Co(1920) 192
Mitchell,Re,Mitchell v Mitchell(1884) 192
Mildred Goyeneche Co v Maspons(1883) 192
Anderson v Sutherland(1897) 192
Mann v Forrester(1814) 192
Crossley v Magniac(1893) 192
Collins v Brook(1860) 192
Meyerstein v The Eastern Agency Co Ltd(1884) 193
Matthews v Haydon(1796) 193
National Employers Mutual General Insurance Assn Ltd v Elphinstone(1929) 193
British Road Services Ltd v Arthur V Crutchley Co Ltd(1968) 193
Edwards Real Estate Ltd v Bamtar Holdings Ltd(1978) 193
Adams(Durham) Ltd v Trust Houses Ltd(1960) 193
Calico Printers Association Ltd v Barcalys Bank(1931) 193
Speight v Gaunt(1883) 193
Swire v Francis(1877) 193
Cheshire(T) Co v Vaughan Bros Co(1920) 193
Mackersy v Ramsays(1843) 193
8.委讬人的补救 195
8.1.委讬人可得到的补救 195
Esso Petroleum v Mardon(1976) 200
Wallersteiner v Moir(No 2)(1975) 204
8.2.补救的性质：就人或就物 205
Chase Manhattan Bank NA v Israel·British Bank Ltd(1980) 208
8.3.累积的或择一的补救 210
Stansfield(Eric V) v South East Nursing Home Services Ltd(1986) 212
Andrews v Ramsay Co(1903) 212
Keppel v Wheeler(1927) 212
Temperley v Blackrod Manufacturing Co Ltd(1907) 212
Heath v Parkinson(1927) 212
Rhodes v Macalister(1923) 212
Stange v Lowitz(1898) 212
Underwood Son Piper v Lewis(1894) 212
Nitedals Taendstidfabrik v Bruster(1906) 213
Jarvis v Moy Davies Smith Vandervell Co(1936) 213
Howell v Young(1826) 213
Denmark Productions Ltd v Boscobel Productions Ltd(1969) 213
Groom v A Crocker(1939) 213
Davies v Lock(1844) 213
Cheshire(T) Co v Vaughan Bros Co(1919) 213
Page One Records Ltd v Britton(1968) 213
Chinnock v Sainsbury(1860) 213
Fraser v Furman(BN)(Productions) Ltd(1967) 213
O Sullivan v Management Agency Music Ltd(1985) 213
Laskin v Bache Co Inc(1971) 213
Mortimer v Beckett(1920) 213
Peninsular Oriental Steam Navigation Co v Johnson(1937) 213
Compania Financiera Soleada SA v Hamoor Tanker Corpn Inc,The Borag (1981) 213
Bean v Wade(1885) 213
Everett v Hogg Robinson(Insurance)(1973) 213
Bagot v Stevens Scanlan Co Ltd(1966) 214
Midland Bank v Hett Stubbs Kemp(1979) 214
Macpherson Kelly v Prunty and Associates(1983) 214
Bartram Sons v Lloyd(1904) 214
Tai Hing Cotton Mill Ltd v Liu Chong Hing Bank Ltd(1986) 214
McPherson v Watt(1877) 214
Clark v Kirby-Smith(1964) 214
Cook v Swinfen(1967) 214
Tufton v Sperni(1952) 214
Panama South Pacific Telegraph Co v India Rubber etc Co(1875) 214
Birtchnell v Equity Trustees, Executors Agency Co Ltd(1929) 215
Cape Breton Co, Re(1885) 215
Burland v Earle(1902) 215
Cavendish Bentinck v Fenn(1887) 215
Lister Co v Stubbs(1890) 215
Silkstone Haigh Moor Coal Co v Edey(1900) 216
Burdick v Garrick(1870) 216
Docker v Somes(1834) 216
Moons v De Bernales(1826) 216
Edgell v Day(1865) 216
Potters v Loppert(1973) 216
Webster v British Empire Mutual Life Assurance Co(1880) 216
Cook v Addison(1869) 216
Hardwicke(Lord) v Vernon(1808) 216
Harsant v Blaine MacDonald Co(1887) 216
Peares v Green(1819) 216
Barclay v Harris Cross(1916) 216
Townsend,Re(1809) 216
Waddell v Blockey(1879) 216
Davis, Re, Davis v Davis(1902) 216
Lupton v White(1808) 217
Power v Power(1884) 217
Taylor v Plumer(1815) 217
Lockey v Lockey(1719) 217
Norwegian Government v Calcutta Marine Eng Co Ltd(1960) 217
Metropolitan Bank v Heiron(1880) 217
9.委讬人对代理人的义务 219
9.1.酬劳 219
9.2.补偿 227
Way v Latilla(1937) 228
Padwick v Stanley(1852) 228
Wilkinson v Martin(1837) 228
Burchell v Gowrie Blockhouse Collieries,Ltd(1910) 228
Kofi Sunkersette Obu v A Strauss Co Ltd(1951) 228
Green v Bartlett(1863) 228
Taplin v Barrett(1889) 228
Marsh v Jelf(1862) 228
Padwick v Hurst(1854) 228
Ackroyd Sons v Hasan(1960) 228
Marshall v Parsons(1841) 228
Hodges(GT) Sons v Hackbridge Park Residential Hotel Ltd(1940) 229
French(L) Co v Leeston Shipping Co Ltd(1922) 229
Stirling v Maitland(1814) 229
Alpha Trading Ltd v Dunnshaw-Patten Ltd(1981) 229
Shackleton Aviation Ltd v Maitland Drewery Aviation Ltd(1964) 229
Hooker(LJ) Ltd v Adamas(WJ) Estates pty Ltd(1976) 229
Queen of Spain v Parr(1869) 229
Torllope(George) Sons v Caplan(1936) 229
Hampton Sons Ltd v George(1939) 229
Lord v Trippe(1977) 229
Southern Foundries(1926) Ltd v Shirlaw(1940) 229
Sovereign Life Assurance Co,Re,Salters Claim(1891) 229
Martin v Tucker(1885) 229
Houlder(Howard) Partners Ltd v Manx Isles Steamship Co(1923) 229
Bentall,Horsley Baldry v Vicary(1931) 229
Wilson v Harper Son Co(1908) 230
Duncan v Hill(1873) 230
Lott v Outhwaite(1893) 230
Levy v Goldhill(1917) 230
Crocker Horlock Ltd v Lang (B) Co Ltd(1949) 230
Pettman v Keble(1850) 230
Young v Cole(1837) 230
Barrett v Gilmour Co(1901) 230
Reynolds v Smith(1893) 230
Rivoli Hats Ltd v Gooch(1953) 230
Sellers v London Counties Newspapers(1951) 230
Gold v Life Assurance Co of Pennsylvania(1971) 230
Adams v Morgan Co(1924) 230
Clayton Newbury Ltd v Findlay(1953) 230
Thacker v Hardy(1878) 230
Bronester Ltd v Priddle(1961) 230
Roberts v Elwells Engineer Ltd(1972) 230
10.2.追讨赔偿的诉讼 231
10.1.追讨酬劳及补偿的诉讼 231
10.3.留置权 231
10.代理人可得的补救 231
Hope(John D) Co v Glendinning(1911) 236
Cowell v Simpson(1809) 236
Kruger v Wilcox(1755) 236
Brando v Barnett(1846) 236
Curwen v Milburn(1889) 236
London Chartered Bank of Australia v White(1879) 237
Madden v Kempster(1807) 237
Albemarle Supply Co v Hind Co(1928) 237
Bowes,Re, Strathmore(Earl of) v Vane(1886) 237
Morris,Re(1908) 237
Dixon v Stansfield(1850) 237
Weeks v Goode(1859) 237
11.1.合同 239
11.委讬人与第三者的关系 239
第六(1)条 241
第二十六条 241
第九十七(1)条 242
第二十四条 242
第五条 246
民事义务(分担)条例(一九八四年修订版，第三百七十七章) Civil Liability (Contribution) Ordinance (Cap 377 of the Revised Edition 1984) 246
Humble v Hunter(1848) 249
Thomson v Davenport(1829) 254
Armstrong v Stokes(1872) 255
11.2.财产的处置 259
第三(1)条 263
第二(1)条 264
货物代理商条例(一九六四年修订版，第四十八章) Factors Ordinance(Cap 48 of the Revised Edition 1964) 264
第二十七(1)条 266
第二十七(2)条 266
11.3.民事侵权行为 266
第二十四(1)条 266
Grant v Norway(1851) 269
11.4.察觉及承认 271
第二十八(1)条 274
Glover v Langford(1892) 278
Filby v Hounsell(1896) 278
Teheran-Europe Co Ltd v Belton(ST)(Tractors) Ltd(1968) 278
Lovesy v Palmer(1916) 278
Higgins v Senior(1841) 278
Potter v Duffield(1874) 278
Rimmer v Bruckner(1858) 278
11.5.导致代理人违背义务 278
Basma v Weekes(1950) 278
Castlespring Enterprises Ltd v Core Resource (HK) Ltd (1987) 278
Dale v Humfrey(1858) 278
Irvine Co v Watson Sons(1880) 279
Beswick v Beswick(1968) 279
Heald v Kenworthy(1855) 279
Miller v Douglas(1886) 279
Davison v Donaldson(1882) 279
Wilde v Gibson(1848) 279
Harmer v Armstrong(1933) 279
Horsfall v Fauntleroy(1830) 279
Chesterfield and Midland Silkstone Colliery Co Ltd v Hawkins(1865) 279
Sinclair s Life Policy,Re(1938) 279
Apthorp v Neville Co(1907) 279
Archer v Stone(1898) 279
Debenham s Ltd v PerKins(1925) 280
Benton v Campbell,Parker Co(1925) 280
Wyatt v Hertford(1802) 280
Pearson v Scott(1879) 280
Sanderson v Bell(1833) 280
Butwick v Grant(1924) 280
Smyth v Anderson(1849) 280
Barker v Greenwood(1837) 280
Drinkwater v Goodwin(1775) 280
Dresser v Norwood(1864) 280
Hudson v Granger(1821) 280
Williams v Evans(1866) 280
Murray v Delta Copper Co Itd(1925) 280
Mynn v Joliffe(1834) 280
Allen v FO Hearn Co(1937) 281
Tomlinson (A) Hauliers v Hepburn(1966) 281
Pople v Evans(1968) 281
Dyster v Randall(1926) 282
Drughorn (Fred) Ltd v Rederiaktiebolaget Transatlantic(1919) 282
Wasa (O/V) SS Co Ltd v Newspaper Pulp Wood Export Ltd(1949) 282
Said v Butt(1920) 282
Calder v Dobell(1871) 282
Epps v Rothnie(1945) 282
Murphy v Rae(1967) 282
Nash v Dix(1898) 282
Montgomerie v United Kingdom Mutual Steamship Assn(1891) 282
Danziger v Thompson(1944) 282
Greer v Downs Supply Co(1927) 282
Finzel,Berry Co v Eastcheap Dried Fruit Co(1962) 282
Collins v Associated Greyhound Racecourses,Ltd(1930) 282
MacClure v Schemeil(1871) 283
O Herlihy v Hedges(1803) 283
Rabone v Williams(1785) 283
Neilson v Powell(1784) 283
Coates v Lewes(1808) 283
Atkinson v Cotesworth(1825) 283
Browning v Provincial Insurance Co of Canada(1873) 283
Kendall v Hamilton(1879) 283
Montagu v Forwood(1893) 284
Semenza v Brinsley(1865) 284
Priestley v Fernie(1865) 284
Morgan v Lifetime Building Supplies Ltd(1967) 284
Smerthurst v Mitchell(1859) 284
George v Claggett(1797) 284
Kaltenbach Fischer Co v Lewis(1885) 284
Lord Cyril Carpet Sales v Browne(1966) 284
Clarkson Booker Ltd v Andjel(1964) 284
Pyxis Special Shipping Co Ltd v Dritsas Kaglis Bros Ltd,The Scaplake(1978) 285
Odell v Cormack Brothers(1887) 285
Lang v Smyth(1831) 285
Turner v Sampson(1911) 285
Hammond v Schofield(1891) 285
Tingey Co v John Chambers Co(1967) 285
Hutchison v The Colorado United Mining Co(1886) 285
Barclays Bank Ltd v Williams(1971) 285
Cross Co v Matthews Wallace(1904) 285
United Dominions Trust Ltd v Western(1976) 285
Barrington v Lee(1972) 285
Perry-Herrick v Attwood(1857) 285
Goodey v Garriock(1972) 285
Swanton Seed Service Ltd v Kulba(1968) 285
France v Clark(1884) 285
Rimmer v Webster(1902) 285
Fry v Smellie(1912) 285
Singer v Ashdown(JH) Hdwe Co(1953) 285
Robinson v Read(1829) 285
Lloyds and Scottish Finance Ltd v Williamson(1965) 286
Eastern Distributors Ltd v Goldring(1957) 286
Lowther v Harris(1927) 286
Pearson v Rose Young Ld(1951) 286
Brown Co v Bedford Pantechnicon Co(Ltd)(1889) 286
Belvoir Finance Ltd v Harold G Cole Ltd(1969) 286
Matchless ,The(1822) 286
Willmott v Barber(1880) 286
Biggs v Evans(1894) 286
Lamb v Attenborough(1862) 286
Budberg v Jerwood(1934) 286
Central Newbury Car Auctions Ltd v Unity Finance Ltd(1957) 286
Freeman v Appleyard(1862) 286
售卖货品条例(一九七七年修订版，第二十六章) Sale of Goods Ordinance (Cap 26 of the Revised Edition 1977) 286
第二(1)条 286
Beverley Acceptances Ltd v Oakley(1982) 286
Tsang Chuen v Li Po Kwai(1932) 286
Ramsden v Dyson(1866) 286
Rice v Rice(1854) 286
Cole v North Western Bank(1872) 286
Heap v Motorists Advisory Agency Limited(1923) 287
Worcester Finance v Cooden Engineering(1972) 287
Gorter v Attenborough(George) Son(1904) 287
Moody v Pall Mall Deposit Forwarding Co Ltd(1917) 287
Lloyds Bank Ltd v Bank of America NTSA(1938) 287
Oppenheimer v Attenborough Son(1908) 287
Astley Industrial Trust v Miller(1968) 287
Oppenheimer v Frazer Wyatt(1907) 287
第十条 287
第九条 287
第三(2)条 287
Nash v Barnes 1922) 287
第三(4)条 287
British Mutual Banking Co v Charnwood Forest Railway Co(1887) 287
Waddington Sons v Neale Sons(1907) 287
Lloyds Bank Ltd v Bank of America NTSA(1937) 287
Nea Tyhi, The(1982) 288
Kooragang Ltd v Richardson Wrench Ltd(1981) 288
Box v Midland Bank Ltd(1979) 288
Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd v Producers Citizens Co-operative Assurance Co of Australia Ltd(1931) 288
Hambro v Burnand(1904) 288
Barwick v English Joint Stock Bank(1867) 288
Uxbridge Permanent Benefit Building Society v Pickard(1939) 288
Texuna International Ltd v Wocom Commodities Ltd(1986) 288
Derry v Peek(1889) 289
Cornfoot v Fowke(1840) 289
London County Freehold Leasehold Properties Ltd v Berkeley Property Investment Co Ltd(1936) 289
Occidental Worldwide Investment Corporation v Skibs As/Avanti,The Siboen and The Sibotre(1976) 289
Armstrong v Strain(1951) 289
第十三条 289
法律修订及改革(综合) 条例(一九八六年修订版，第二十三章) Law Amendment and Reform(Consolidation) Ordinance (Cap 23 of the Revised Edition 1986) 289
Pearson Son Ltd v Dublin Corporation(1907) 289
Tanham v Nicholson(1872) 290
Rendal A/S v Arcos Ltd(1937) 290
Warrick v Warrick(1745) 290
Wall v New Ireland Assurance Co Ltd(1965) 290
Gladstone v King(1813) 290
Tsang Shiu Tim v Wong Kee(1960) 290
Blackburn Low Co v Vigors(1887) 290
Kennedy v Green(1834) 290
United Dominions v Shannon Caravans(1976) 290
Thompson v Cartwright(1863) 290
Saffron Walden Second Benefit Building Society v Rayner(1880) 290
Wyllie v Pollen(1863) 290
Waldy v Gray(1875) 290
Taylor v Yorkshire Insurance Co(1913) 290
Brewery Assets Corp,Re, Truman s Case(1894) 290
Grahame(JW)(English Financiers) Ltd v Ingram(1955) 290
Eagle Star Insurance Co v Spratt(1971) 291
Pennell v Stephens(1849) 291
Turvey v Dentons(1923) Ltd(1953) 291
Hampshire Land Co Ltd,Re(1896) 291
Anglo·Scottish Beet Sugar Corp v Spalding UDC(1937) 291
Eagle Star Insurance Co v Spratt(1975) 291
Eda Holdings Ltd v Etek Holdings Ltd(1989) 291
Marseilles Extension Railway Co,Re,Ex p Credit Foncier Mobolier of England(1871) 291
Jasperson v Dominion Tobacco Co(1923) 291
Ashton,Rc,Ex p McGowan(1891) 291
Fenwick Stobart Co,Re(1902) 291
12.代理人与第三者的关系 293
12.1.透露的委讬人 293
第二十六A(1)条 300
第二十六(2)条 300
第二十六(1)条 300
第二十六条 300
Bridges Salmon Ltd v Owners of the Swan (1968) 301
Collen v Wright(1857) 303
12.3.不透露的委讬人 305
12.2.代理人是真正的事主 305
Brandt(HO) Co v Morris(HN) Co Ltd(1917) 306
Cable Wireless Systems Ltd v Wu Man Kin Eddie(1989) 306
Lennard v Robinson(1855) 306
Gadd v Houghton(1876) 306
Maritime Stores Ltd v Marshal(HP) Co Ltd(1963) 306
Wake v Harrop(1862) 306
Lewis v Nicholson(1852) 306
Santa Carina,The(1977) 306
Tanner v Christian(1854) 306
Paice v Walker(1870) 306
Dragages et Travaux Publics v Gladhover Ltd(1988) 306
Universal Steam Navigation Co v Mckelvie(James) Co(1923) 306
Parker v Winlow(1857) 306
Whitehead v Izod,见 Chapman v Shepherd Wickberg v Shatsky(1969) 307
Spittle v Lavender(1821) 307
Lester v Balfour Williamson Merchant Shippers Ltd(1953) 307
Hall v Ashurst(1833) 307
Phonogram Ltd v Lane(1981) 307
Burrell v Jones(1819) 307
Oglesby v Yglesias(1858) 307
Iveson v Conington(1823) 307
International Railway Co v Niagara parks Commission(1941) 307
Marblestone Industries Ltd v Fairchild(1975) 307
Black v Smallwood(1965-1966) 307
Gullischen v Stewart Brothers(1884) 307
Polhill v Walter(1832) 308
Cheung Yiu Wing v Blooming Textiles Ltd(1975) 308
Hersom v Bemett(1955) 308
Elliott v Bax·Ironside(1925) 308
Steele v M Kinlay(1880) 308
第二十三条 308
Dunn v MacDonald(1897) 308
票据条例(一九六四年修订版，第十九章) Bills of Exchange Ordinance(Cap 19 of the Revised Edition 1964) 308
Appleton v Binks(1804) 308
Grice v Kenrick(1870) 309
Bowen v Morris(1810) 309
Coppin v Walker(1816) 309
Evans v Hooper(1875) 309
Short v Spackman(1831) 309
Coppin v Craig(1816) 309
Cooke v Wilson(1856) 309
Halbot v Lens(1901) 309
Repetto v Millar s Karri Jarrah Forests Ltd(1901) 309
Williams v Millington(1788) 309
Atkyns v Amber(1796) 309
Fawkes v Lamb(1862) 309
Firbank s Executors v Humphreys(1886) 309
Robinson v Rutter(1855) 309
Rasnoimport(v/o) v Guthrie Co Ltd(1966) 309
Albacruz,The(Cargo Owners) v Albazero(Owners)(1977) 309
Winkfield,The(1902) 309
Bramwell v Spiller(1870) 309
Provincial Insurance Co of Canada v Leduc(1874) 309
Fairlie v Fenton(1870) 309
Farley Health Products Ltd v Babylon Trading Co(1987) 310
Lilly Wilson Co v Smales Eeles Co(1892) 310
Spedding v Nevell(1869) 310
Simons v Patchett(1857) 310
Peto v Blades(1814) 310
McDonnell v McGuinness(1939) 310
Resolute Maritime Inc v Nippon Kaiji Kyokai,The Skopas(1983) 310
Godwin v Francis(1870) 310
Stuart v Haigh(1893) 310
Dodds Dodds v Millman(1964) 310
Starkey v Bank of England(1903) 310
第三(1)条 310
Hughes v Graeme(1864) 310
Bain v Fothergill(1874) 310
Mational Coffee Palalce Co,Re,Ex p Panmure(1883) 310
虚伪陈词条例(一九六九年修订版，第二百八十四章) Misrepresentation Ordinance(Cap 284 of the Revised Edition 1969) 310
Delta Construction Co Ltd v Lidstone et al(1979) 310
Schmaltz v Avery(1851) 311
Carr v Jackson(1852) 311
Harper Co v Vigers Bros(1909) 311
Bickerton v Burrell(1816) 311
Sharman v Brandt(1871) 311
Rayner v Grote(1846) 311
13.1.可以撤回的权力的终止 313
13.权力的终止 313
13.2.不可以撤回的权力 322
第四条 324
13.3.终止的后果 326
Joynson v Hunt Son(1905) 330
Keshen v Lipsky Co(1956) 330
Motion v Michaud(1892) 330
第五(4)条 330
第五(2)条 330
第五(1)条 330
Friend v Young(1897) 331
Crediton Gas Co v Crediton Urban Council(1928) 331
Berder Sportcraft Ltd s Agreement, Re(1947) 331
Smout v Ilbery(1842) 331
Yonge v Toynbee(1910) 331
Pool v Pool(1889) 331
Selfe v Colonial Ice Co(1894) 331
Staffordshire Area Health Authority v South Staffordshire Waterworks Co(1978) 331
Markwick v Hardington(1880) 331
Campanari v Woodburn(1854) 331
Paper Sales Corpn Ltd v Miller Bros Co(1962) Ltd(1975) 331
Martin-Baker Aircraft Co Ltd v Canadian Flight Equipment Ltd(1955) 331
Farrow v Wilson(1860) 331
Blades v Free(1829) 331
Foster v Bates(1843) 331
Boise Cascade Canada Ltd v The Queen in Right of Ontario (1979) 331
Douglas,Re,Ex p Snowball(1872) 331
Tasker v Shepherd(1861) 331
Bauman v Hulton Press Ltd(1952) 331
Sovfracht(v/o) v Van Udens Scheepvaarten Agentur Maatschappj(NV Gebr)(1943) 332
Marshall(Thomas)(Exports) Ltd v Guinle(1979) 332
McCall v The Australian Meat Co(Ltd)(1870) 332
Marshall v Glanville(1917) 332
Tingley v Muller(1917) 332
Gough s Garages Ltd v Pugsley(1930) 332
Sowman v David Samuel Trust Ltd(1978) 332
Edmiston v Wright(1807) 332
Frith v Frith(1906) 332
Morgan v Manser(1948) 332
Hangkam Kwingtong Woo v Liu Lan Fong(1951) 332
Nordman v Rayner and Sturges(1916) 332
破产条例(一九八六年修订版，第六章) Bankruptcy Ordinance(Cap 6 of the Revised Edition 1986) 332
Atlanic Underwriting Agencies v Companiadi Assicurazione di Milano SpA(1979) 332
Clea Shipping Corp v Bulk oil International Ltd,The Alaskan Trader(1984) 333
Sanders v Neale(Earnest A) Ltd(1974) 333
Decro-Wall International SA v Practitioners in Marketing Ltd(1971) 333
Gunton v Richmond-upon-Thames LBC(1982) 333
Brace v Calder(1895) 333
Attica Sea Carriers Corp v Ferrostal Poseidon Bulk Reederei GmbH(1976) 333
Hill v Parsons(CA) Co Ltd(1972) 333
Patent Floor Cloth Co Ltd,The,Re,Dean Gilbert s Claim(1872) 333
Inchbald v Western Neilgherry Coffee Co Ltd(1864) 333
White Carter(Councils) Ltd v McGregor(1962) 333
Francis v Kuala Lumpur Councillors(1962) 333
Reigate v Union Manufacturing Co(Ramsbottom) Ltd(1918) 334
Lazarus v Cairn Line of Steamships Ltd(1912) 334
Warren Co v Agdeshman(1922) 334
Nolan(Geo H) (1956)Ltd v Watson (HA) Co Ltd(1965) 334
General Publicity Service Ltd v Best s Brewery Co Ltd(1951) 334
Newman(RS) Ltd,Re,Raphael s Claim(1916) 334
Smart v Sandars(1848) 334
Gaussen v Morton(1830) 334
Premier Products Ltd,Re(1965) 334
Hannah s Empress Gold Mining and Development Co,Re Carmichael s Case(1896) 334
Rhodes v Forwood(1876) 334
Turner v Goldsmith(1891) 334
Scarf v Jardine(1882) 334
De Comas v Frost(1865) 334
English Scottish Aarine Insurance Co,Re,Ex p Macclure(1870) 334
Read v Anderson(1884) 335
Crowfoot v Gurney(1832) 335
Doward,Dickson Co v Williams Co(1890) 335
Watson v King(1815) 335
Taplin v Florence(1851) 335
Yates v Hoppe(1850) 335
Bilbie v Hasse Co(1889) 335
Overweg, Re,Haas v Durant(1900) 335
Kung Wing Chuen,Francis v Antony Louis Marden(1989) 336
14.合夥人 337
第六条 337
第七条 337
第四十七条 337
14.1.能力 338
社团条例(一九八八年修订版，第一百五十一章) Societies Ordinance (Cap 151 of the Revised Edition 1988) 339
第二(1)条 339
第三百四十五(1)条 339
14.2.代理的构成 340
第四条 341
移交产权及资产条例(一九八八年修订版，第二百十九章) Conveyancing and Property Ordinance(Cap 219 of the Revised Edition 1988) 342
第五条 342
Dale v Hamilton(1846) 342
第三(1)条 342
第五(1)条 342
第十六条 343
14.3.合夥人的权力 343
第十条 343
第九条 346
第二十九(1)条 347
第二十六(e)条 347
第二十六(f)条 347
第二十六(h)条 347
第二十八(2)条 347
第二十九(2)条 347
第二十六(g)条 347
第二十七条 347
14.4.合夥人的义务 347
第三十二条 348
第三十一(1)条 348
第四十五条 351
第四十四条 351
第二十六(i)条 353
14.5.合夥人的补救 353
第三十条 353
第四十三条 353
第三十七条 354
第十二条 355
14.6.合夥与第三者的关系 355
第十五条 356
第十八条 356
第十三条 357
第十一条 357
14.8.关系终止 357
14.7.合夥人的次义务 357
第三十五条(1)条 358
第三十五条(2)条 358
第三十六条 358
第三十四条(2)条 358
第三十四条(1)(c)条 358
第三十四条(1)(a)条 358
第三十四条(1)(b)条 358
第四十条 359
第三十九条 359
第三十八(3)条 359
第三十八(1)条 359
第四十一条 359
第十九(3)条 360
第十九(2)条 360
第三十八(2)条 360
第五(2)条 361
14.9.有限责任合夥 361
有限责任合夥商号条例(一九八一年修订版，第三十七章) Limited Partnership Ordinance(Cap 37 of the Revised Edition 1981) 361
第三(1)条 361
第三(2)条 361
第四条 361
第九条 361
第八条 361
第七条 361
第五(1)条 361
第六条 361
第五(6)(e)条 361
第五(3)条 361
第五(6)(d)条 361
第五(6)(c)条 361
第五(5)条 361
合夥经营条例(一九六四年修订版，第三十八章) Partnership Ordinance(Cap 38 of the Revised Edition 1964) 362
第三百四十五(2)条 362
Sadler v Lee(1843) 362
Chan Sau-Kut v Gray Iron Construction Engineering Co(1986) 362
Yim Wai·tsang v Lee Yuk·har(1973) 362
Johnson,Stokes Master v Trevor Ernest Boucher(1989) 362
Jones v Noy(1833) 362
De Choisy v Hynes(1937) 362
附表 362
Bank of England v Vagliano Brothers(1891) 362
第三条 362
Weiner v Harris(1910) 362
Waugh v Carver(1793) 363
Bonbonus,Ex p(1803) 363
Bond v Gibson(1808) 363
Rothwell v Humphreys(1795) 363
Forster v Hale(1880) 363
Gardiner v Childs(1837) 363
Dyke v Brewer and Tiddy(1849) 363
Carruthers v Sheddon(1815) 363
Gleadon v Tinkler(1817) 363
Cox v Hickman(1860) 363
Hunt v The Royal Exchange Assurance(1816) 363
Hooper v Lusby(1814) 363
Munro v Stein(1961) 363
Tredwen v Bourne(1840) 363
Sharp v Milligan(1856) 363
Ng So Kuen v Ng Luen Fong(1985) 363
Grace v Smith(1775) 363
Caddick v Skidmore(1857) 363
Gray v Smith(1889) 363
Mara v Browne(1896) 364
Bishop v Countess of Jeresy(1854) 364
Adansonia Fibre Co,Re(1874) 364
Baker v Charlton(1791) 364
Sifkin v Walker(1809) 364
Norton v Seymour(1847) 364
Backhouse v Charlton(1878) 364
Rhodes v Moules(1895) 364
Bourne, Re, Bourne v Bourne(1906) 364
Harman v Johnson(1853) 364
Higgins v Beauchamp(1914) 364
Dickinson v Valpy(1829) 364
Briggs Co,Re,Ex P Wright(1906) 364
Hogarth v Latham Co(1878) 364
Chippendale, Ex p,Re German Mining Co(1854) 364
Laws v Rand(1857) 364
Clough,Re, Bradford Commercial Banking Co v Cure(1885) 364
Brettel v Williams(1849) 364
Levy v Pyne(1842) 364
Lambert s Case(1690) 364
De Tastet v Carroll(1815) 364
Burmester v Norris(1851) 364
Wilson v Lewis(1840) 364
Forster v Mackreth(1867) 364
Fisher v Tayler(1843) 364
Wheatley v Smithers(1906) 364
Willet v Chambers(1778) 364
Brown v Byers(1847) 364
Eyre, Ex p (1842) 364
Hawkshaw v Parkins(1819) 365
Agace,Ex p(1792) 365
Niemann v Niemann(1889) 365
Hatton v Royle(1858) 365
Alliance Bank,Ltd v Kearsley(1871) 365
Arbuckle v Taylor(1815) 365
Bell s Indenture,Re,Bell v Hickley(1980) 365
Tomlinson v Broadsmith(1896) 365
Barker v Richardson(1827) 365
Campbell v McCreath(1975) 365
Thomas v Atherton(1878) 365
Beale v Caddick(1857) 365
Beckham v Drake(1841) 365
Brunswick(Duke of) v Slowman(1849) 365
Steiglitz v Egginton(1815) 365
Harrison v Jackson(1797) 365
Court v Berlin(1897) 365
Peele,Ex p(1802) 365
Strangford v Green(1677) 365
Watson v Woodman(1875) 365
Phillips v Clagett(1843) 365
Piercy v Fynney(1871) 365
Donaldson v Williams(1833) 365
Stead v Salt(1825) 365
Powell v Broadhurst(1901) 365
Garland v Jacomb(1873) 365
Adams v Bankart(1835) 365
Doe d Macleod v East London Waterworks Co(1828) 365
British American Oil Producing Co v Midway Oil Co(1938) 366
Fuller v Duncan(1891) 366
Purdon v Muller(1961) 366
Rowe v Wood(1795) 366
Trimble v Goldberg(1906) 366
Aas v Benham(1891) 366
M Lure v Ripley(1850) 367
Smith v Jeyes(1841) 367
Anderson v Anderson(1857) 367
Carmichael v Evans(1904) 367
Clegg v Fishwick(1849) 367
Gordon v Gonda(1955) 367
Perens v Johnson(1857) 367
Fawcett v Whitehouse(1829) 367
Marshall v Colman(1820) 367
Essell v Hayward(1860) 367
Lo Ling Leung·chai,Re(1980) 367
Law v Law(1905) 367
Knox v Gye(1872) 367
Lawson v Morgan(1815) 367
Lees v Laforest(1851) 367
Baring v Dix(1786) 368
Leary v Shout(1864) 368
Salomons v Nissen(1788) 368
Porthouse v Parker(1807) 368
Powles v Page(1846) 368
Cheesman v Price(1865) 368
Jacaud v French(1810) 368
Bignold v Waterhoues(1813) 368
Worcester Corn Exchange Co,Re(1853) 368
第十四条 368
Watney v Wells(1861) 368
第十七条 368
Baxter v West(1858) 368
Yenidje Tobacco Co Ltd,Re(1916) 368
Electric Telegraph of Ireland,Re(1956) 368
Amalgamated Syndicate,Re(1897) 368
Steele v Stuart(1866) 368
Alderson v Pope(1808) 368
Harrison v Tennant(1856) 368
Parkin v Carruthers(1800) 369
Tower Cabinet Co Ltd v Ingram(1949) 369
Chung Chih Yien v Tailor King(1967) 369
Warder v Stilwell(1857) 369
Blisset v Daniel(1853) 369
Sales v Crispi(1913) 370
Barfoot v Goodall(1811) 370
Graham v Hope(1792) 370
M lver v Humble(1812) 370
Gorham v Thompson(1791) 370
Townsend v Jarman(1900) 370
Boydell v Drummond(1808) 370
Newsome v Coles(1811) 370
Hart v Alexander(1837) 370
Burchell v Wilde(1900) 370
Williams v Keats(1817) 370
Fraser,Re,Ex p Central Bank of London(1892) 370
15.1.代理的构成及权力 373
15.公司董事及高级职员 373
Houghton Co v Nothard Lowe Wills Ltd(1928) 378
第二十(1)条 388
City Equitable Fire Insurance Co,Re(1925) 389
15.2.代理人的义务 389
Automatic Self-Cleansing Filter Syndicate Co Ltd v Cunninghame(1906) 391
Aberdeen Railway Co v Blaikie(1854) 402
Percival v Wright(1902) 406
第九(1)条 413
Brown v British Abrasive Wheel Co(1919) 417
Sidebottom v Kershaw Leese Co(1920) 417
Foss v Harbottle(1843) 420
15.3.委讬人的补救 420
15.4.公司与第三者 425
Ruben v Great Fingall Consolidated(1906) 426
15.5.董事与第三者的关系 429
15.6.关系终止 431
Gaiman v National Association for Mental Health(1971) 433
Great Wheal Polgrooth Ltd,Re(1883) 433
Great Western Forest of Dean Coal Con-sumer Society,Re,Carter s Case(1886) 433
Toppam Printing Co Ltd v Champion Dragon Development Ltd(1986) 433
1990成年年岁数(有关条文)条例(一九九零年第三十二号) Age of Majority(Related Provisions) Ordinance(No 32 of 1990) 433
Osborne v Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants(1909) 433
Broadlands Finance Ltd v Gisborne Aero Club Inc(1974) 433
第一百五十七C条 433
Morris v Kanssen(1946) 434
Channel Collieries Trust,Ltd v Dover,St Margaret s and Martin Mill Light Railway(1914) 434
Bodega Co Ltd, Re(1904) 434
第一百五十四条(2)条 434
第一百五十七条 434
第一百五十六(1)条 434
第一百五十五(3)条 434
第一百五十五(1)条 434
第一百五十四条B条 434
第一百五十四条A条 434
Tyne Mutual Steamship Insurance Association v Brown(Peter)(1896) 434
第一百五十七E条 434
第一百五十七F条 434
第一百五十三条 434
第一百五十三条(1)条 434
British Asbestos Co Ltd v Boyd(1903) 434
第二十三(1)(a)条 434
第一百五十八(5)条 434
Kanssen v Rialton(West End) Ld(1944) 434
Cunningham Co Ltd,Re,Simpson s Claim(1887) 435
Mahony v East Holyford Mining Co(1875) 435
Rosebank Television App Co v Orbit Sales Corp Ltd(1969) 435
Scottish Loan and Finance Co Ltd,Re(1944) 435
Dawson v African Consolidated Land and Trading Company(1898) 435
Burnside v Dayrell(1849) 436
Barnett, Hoares Co v South London Tramways Company(1887) 436
British Thomson.Houston Co v Federated European Bank Ld(1932) 436
Ho Wing Cheong v Graham Margot(1987) 436
Dey v Pullinger Engineering Co(1921) 436
Panorama Developments(Guildford) Ltd v Fidelis Furnishing Fabrics Ltd(1971) 436
Clay Hill Brick Co v Rawlings(1938) 436
Bank of New South Wales v Goulburn Valley Butter Co Proprietary Ltd(1902) 436
Daimler Company ,Ltd v Continental Tyre and Rubber Company(Great Britain) Ltd(1916) 436
Kleinwort Sons Co v Associated Automatic Machine Corp(1934) 436
Biggerstaff v Rowatt s Wharf, Ltd(1896) 436
第一百五十四条(1)条 436
County Palatine Loan and Discount Company,Re,Cartmell s Caes(1874) 437
Kreditbank Cassel GmbH v Schenkers(1927) 437
Ernest v Nicholls (1857) 437
Maidstone Buildings Provisions Ltd,Re(1971) 437
Liggett(B)(liverpool) Ltd v Barclays Bank(1928) 437
Royal British Bank, The v Turquand(1856) 437
Land Credit Company of Ireland,Re,Ex p Overend Gurney Co(1869) 438
Duck v Tower Galvanizing Company(1901) 438
Denham Co,Re(1883) 438
Turquand v Marshall(1859) 438
Cardiff Savings Bank,Re,Marquis of Bute s Case(1892) 438
County of Gloucester Bank v Rudry Merthyr Steam and House Coal Colliery Co(1895) 438
County Life Assurance Company,Re(1870) 438
Shaw(John) Sons(Salford) Ld v Shaw (1935) 439
Quin Axtens Limited v Salmon(1909) 439
Ward(Alexander) Co Ltd v Samyang Navigation Co Ltd(1975) 439
Black White and Grey Cabs Ltd v Fox(1969) 439
Huckerby v Elliot(1970) 439
Dovey v Cory(1901) 439
Marshall s Valve Gear Company,Limited v Manning,Wardle Co,Limited(1909) 439
Isle of Wight Railway Co v Tahourdin 439
Forest of Dean Coal Mining Co,Re(1879) 439
Joint Stock Discount Co v Brown(1869) 439
Municipal Freehold Land Co Ltd v Pollington(1890) 439
Hirschler v Birch(1987) 439
Briess v Woolley(1954) 440
公司条例(一九八四年修订版，第三十二章) Companies Ordinance(Cap 32 of the Revised Edition 1984) 440
第二(1)条 440
Tang Kam-yip v Yau Kung School(1986) 440
Canadian Land Reclaiming Colonizing Co, Re,Coventry Dixon s Case(1880) 440
Bell v Lever Brothers Ltd(1932) 440
Dafen Tinplate Co v Llanelly Steel Co(1920) 440
Fireman,Simon v Golden Rice Bowl Ltd(1987) 441
Lonrho Ltd v Shell Petro|eum Co Ltd(1980) 441
Roith(W M) Ltd,Re(1967) 441
Yorke(Stationers) Pty Ltd,Re(1965) 441
Wincham Shipbuilding, Boiler Salt Co,Re,Poole Jackson Whyte s Case(1878) 441
Walker v Wimbornc(1976) 441
European Central Railway Co,Re,Syke s Case(1872) 441
Brooks(William) Co Ltd, Re(1962) 441
Smith v Fawcett(1942) 441
Smith v Cock(1911) 441
Australian Fixed Trusts v Clyde Industries Ltd(1959) 441
Taunton v Royal Insurance Co(1864) 441
Shuttleworth v Cox Brothers Co(1927) 441
Clay v Rufford(1852) 442
Bamford v Bamford(1970) 442
Smith (Howard) Ltd v Ampol Petroleum Ltd(1974) 442
Mandarin Resources Corpn Ltd v Cheng Heng-soon,David(1988) 442
Tintin Exploration Syndicate,Limited v Sandys(1947) 442
Vestey s Settlement,Re,Lloyd s Bank Ltd v O Meara(1950) 442
Parke v Daily News Ltd(1962) 442
Dunstan v Houison(1901) 442
Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock(No 3)(1968) 442
Hutton v West Cork Railway Co(1883) 442
Oceanic Steam Navigation Co v Sutherberry(1880) 442
Thorby v Goldberg(1965) 443
Broadcasting Station 2Gb pty Ltd, Re(1964) 443
Scottish Co-operative Wholesale Society Ltd v Meyer(1959) 443
Levin v Clark(1962) 443
Galloway v Halle Concerts Society(1915) 443
Clark v Workman(1920) 443
Harris v North Devon Railway Co(1855) 443
Greenwell v Porter(1902) 443
Charterbridge Corpn Ltd v Lloyds Bank(1970) 443
Hivac Ltd V Park Royal Scientific Instruments Ltd(1946) 444
第一百五十七G条 444
第一百六十三D条 444
第一百五十七H条 444
第一百六十三C条 444
第一百六十一(1)条 444
Man Lue