香港代理法PDF电子书下载

1.引言 1

1.1.代理的定义及基础 1

Ireland v Livingston (1872) 4

1.2.代理与其他交易的区别 5

1.3.能力 6

Doe d Thomas v Roberts(1847) 7

Zouch v Parsons(1765) 7

个案判例表 11

1.4.谁的代理人 14

Shephard v Cartwright(1953) 18

Bevan v Webb(1901) 18

Colland v Lloyd(1840) 18

Bolus Co Ltd v Inglis Bros Ltd(1924) 18

Robinson v Mollett(1874) 18

Doyle v White City Stadium Ltd(1935) 18

Brown Gracie Ltd v Green(FW) Co(1960) 18

G(A) v G(T)(1970) 18

Drew v Nunn(1879) 18

Downie Bros v Henry Oakley Sons(1923) 18

Butlers(London) Ltd v Roope Co(1922) 18

McLaughlin v Darcy(1918) 18

Golden City Theatre Ltd Re(1954) 18

Mackinlay v Bathurst(1919) 18

Bateman v Mid·Wales Railway Co(1866) 18

R v Longnor(1833) 18

Imperial Loan Company Ltd v Stone(1892) 19

Hunter v Parker(1840) 19

Daily Telegraph Newspaper Co v Mclaughlin(1904) 19

Taylor v Walker(1958) 19

Gibbons v Wright(1953) 19

Whelpdale s Case(1604) 19

Mack v Royal Bank of Canada(1931) 19

Royal Bank v Mack(1932) 19

已婚人士地位条例(一九七二年修订版，第一百八十二章) Married Persons Status Ordinance (Cap 182 of the Revised Edition 1972) 19

Hong Chi Mui v Tong Ching Co(1964) 20

Jebara v Ottoman Bank(1927) 20

Pidgeon v Burslem(1849) 20

Jessopp v Lutwyche(1854) 20

Phoenix General Insurance Co of Greece SA v Halvanon Insurance Co Ltd(1985) 20

Cope v Rowlands(1836) 20

Commonwealth Trust Co v Dewitt(1973) 20

Bird v Boulter(1833) 20

Smith v Lindo(1858) 20

Stewart v Oriental Fire Marine Insurance Co Ltd(1985) 20

Bedford Insurance Co Ltd v Instituto de Resseguros do Brasil(1984) 20

Kuenigl v Donnersmarck(1955) 20

Stevenson (Hugh) and Sons v Aktiengesellschaft fur Carton Nagen Industrie(1918) 20

Boston Deep Sea Fishing Ice Co Ltd v Farnham(1957) 20

Farebother v Simmons(1882) 20

Singh v Ali(1960) 20

De Mattos v Benjamin(1894) 20

Hawkins v Kemp(1803) 21

Chu Yen Estates Ltd v Ho Sau-Ki(1976) 21

Clauss v Pir(1987) 21

Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Pools Finance(1937)Ltd(1952) 21

Gosling v Gaskell(1897) 21

Yeung Kai Yung(Stanley) v Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corpn(1981) 21

Tennant v London County Council(1957) 21

Newsholme Bros v Road Transport General Insurance Co(1929) 21

Blucher(prince),Re,Ex p Debtor(1931) 21

Stone v Reliance Mutual Insurance Society Ltd(1972) 21

Branwhite v Worcester Works Finance Co Ltd(1969) 21

Financings Ltd v Stimson(1962) 21

Sorrell v Finch(1976) 21

London County Council v Agricultural Food Products Ltd(1955) 21

Hine Brothers v The Steamship Insurance Syndicate Ltd(1895) 22

Manchester Trust v Furness(1895) 22

Bart v British West Indian Airways Ltd(1967) 22

2.1.明文协议 23

2.协定代理 23

2.2.暗示协议 23

Megevand,Re,Ex p Delhasse(1878) 26

第二(1)条 28

第五(1)条 28

2.3.协议形式 28

授权书条例(一九八七年修订版，第三十一章) Power of Attorney Ordinance (Cap 31 of the Revised Edition 1987) 28

Pole v Leask(1863) 29

Freeman Lockyer v Buckhurst Park Properties(Mangal) Ltd(1964) 29

Ruggles v American Central Insurance Co of St Louis(1889) 29

Little v Spreadbury(1910) 29

Moore v Peachey(1891) 29

Ashford Shire Council v Dependable Motors Pty Ltd(1961) 29

Chatenay(M) v The Brazilian Submarine Telegraph Co Ltd(1891) 29

Garnac Grain Co Inc v Faure(HMF) Fairclough Ltd(1968) 29

Hutchings v Nunes(1863) 29

Roberts v Ogilby(1821) 29

Lord v Hall(1849) 30

Berkeley v Hardy(1856) 30

Marchant v Morton,Down Co(1901) 30

Ball v Dunsterville(1791) 30

Hibblewhite v M Morine(1840) 30

Kennedy v De Trafford(1897) 30

第二十六条 30

Burgis v Constantine(1908) 30

Heard v Pilley(1869) 30

Windsor Refrigerator Co Ltd v Branch Nominees Ltd(1961) 30

Garnac Grain Co Inc v Faure(HMF) Fairclough Ltd(1966) 30

3.追认代理 31

3.1.谁可追认 32

Keighley Maxsted Co v Durant(1901) 32

3.2.甚么可以追认 37

Harrisons Crossfield Ltd v London and North Western Railway(1917) 41

Commercial Banking Co of Sydney v Mann(1961) 43

Mercantile Bank of India Ltd v Chartered Bank of India(1937) 43

Union Bank of Australia v McClintock(1922) 43

3.3.何时追认 45

3.4.怎样追认 47

Kidderminster(Mayor of ) v Hardwick(1873) 47

Bolton Partners v Lambert(1888) 47

Crampsey v Deveney(1969) 50

3.5.追认的后果 51

Firth v Staines(1897) 54

Wilson v Tumman(1843) 54

Dibbins v Dibbins(1896) 54

Bird v Brown(1850) 54

第三十二A(1)条 55

Ashbury Railway Carriage and Iron Co v Riche(1875) 55

Spiro v Lintern(1973) 55

Irvine v Union Bank of Australia(1877) 55

Tiedmann and Ledermann Freres,Re(1899) 55

Newborne v Sensolid(Great Britain)Ltd(1954) 55

Soames v Spencer(1822) 55

Barclays Bank Ltd v Roberts(1954) 55

Watson v Swann(1862) 55

Kelner v Baxter(1866) 55

Danish Mercantile Co Ltd v Beaumont(1951) 56

Banque Jacques-Cartier,La v La Banque d Epargne de Montreal(1887) 56

De Bussche v Alt(1878) 56

Brook v Hook(1871) 56

Fitzmaurice v Bayley(1856) 56

Watson v Davies(1931) 56

Marsh v Keating(1834) 56

Marsh v Joseph(1897) 56

Spackman v Evans(1868) 56

Eastern Counties Railway Co Richardson v Broom(1851) 57

Wilson v Poulter(1724) 57

Keay v Fenwick(1876) 57

Bristow v Whitmore(1861) 57

Buron v Denman(1848) 57

Brewer v Sparrow(1827) 57

Hilbery v Hatton(1864) 57

Hull v Pickersgill(1819) 57

Peru(Republic of) v Peruvian Guano Co(1887) 57

R v Dring(1857) 57

R v Woodward(1862) 57

Mawcon Ltd,Re(1969) 57

Rowe v Nominees(B R) pty Ltd(1964) 57

Midland Bank Ltd v Reckitt(1933) 58

Kinsella v Hamilton(1890) 58

Candian Laboratory Supplies Ltd v En.gelhard Industries of Canada(1979) 58

Doe d Mann v Walters(1830) 58

Canadian Laboratory Supplies Ltd v Engelhard Industries of Canada(1977) 58

McEvoy v Belfast Banking Co,The(1935) 59

Portuguese Consolidated Copper Mines Ltd,Re(1890) 59

Metropolitan Asylums Board v Kingham Son(1890) 59

Refugee Assurance Co Ltd v Kettlewell(1909) 59

Forman Co Proprietary Ltd v The Ship Liddesdale (1900) 59

Hooper v Kerr Stuart Co Ltd(1901) 59

Cornwal v Wilson(1750) 59

Becket,Re, Purnell v Paine(1918) 59

London Colonial Co,Re,Ex p Clark(1869) 59

Walter v James(1871) 59

Koenigsblatt v Sweet(1923) 60

Sheridan v Higgins(1971) 60

McKenzie v British Linen Company(1881) 60

Phillips v Homfray(1871) 60

City Bank of Sydney v McLaughlin(1909) 60

Bigg v Strong(1858) 60

Robinson v Gleadow(1835) 60

Bank Melli Iran v Barclays Bank(Dominion,Colonial Overseas)(1951) 60

Comber v Anderson(1808) 60

Fung Kai Sun v Chan Fui Hing(1951) 60

Ho Tung v Man On Insurance Company(1902) 60

Reuter v Electric Telegraph Co,The(1856) 60

Prince v Clark(1823) 60

Simpson v Eggington(1855) 60

Maclean v Dunn(1828) 61

Great Atlantic Insurance Co v Home Insurance Co(1981) 61

Mineworkers Union v Brodick(1948) 61

Lawson v Hosemaster Co Ltd(1966) 61

Oxford(Mayor,Alderman and Citizens of) v Crow(1893) 61

Fleming v Bank of New Zealand(1900) 62

Warehousing and Forwarding Co of East Africa Ltd v Jafferali Sons(1964) 62

4.1.不容否认代理是甚么 63

4.不容否认代理 63

4.2.声明 65

Farquaharson Brothers Co v C King Co(1902) 68

Armagas Ltd v Mundogas SA,The Ocean Frost(1986) 71

Egyptian International Foreign Trade Co v Soplex Wholesale Supplies Ltd, The Raffaella(1985) 72

British Bank of the Middle East v Sun Life Assurance Co of Canada(UK) Ltd(1983) 75

4.3.依赖 76

Rama Corpn Ltd v Proved Tin General Investments Ltd(1952) 78

4.4.损害 78

4.5.不得提出不容否认 78

Todd v Robinson(1825) 80

Hopgood v Brown(1955) 80

Whitechurch(George) Ltd v Cavanagh(1902) 80

Moorgate Mercantile Co Ltd v Twitchings(1976) 80

4.6.不容否认的后果 80

Lloyd v Grace,Smith Co(1912) 81

Hely·Hutchinson v Brayhead Ltd(1968) 81

Summers v Solomon(1857) 81

Greenwood v Martins Bank(1933) 81

Richardson v Cartwright(1844) 81

Bradford Sons v Price Brothers(1923) 81

Inland Revenue Commissioners v Ufitec Group Ltd(1977) 81

International Sponge Importers Ltd v Andrew Watt Sons(1911) 81

Wright v Glyn(1902) 81

Yung Woon Cheung v Mok Cheung(1961) 81

Crabb v Arun District Council(1976) 81

London Joint Stock Bank v MacMillan and Arthur(1918) 82

Mercantile Credit Co Ltd v Hamblin(1965) 82

Attorney General for Ceylon v Silva(AD)(1953) 82

Cypress Disposal Ltd v Inland Sales Ltd(1975) 82

Swan v The North British Australasian Co Ltd(1863) 82

Union Credit Bank v Mersey Docks Harbour Board(1899) 82

Jensen v South Trail Mobile Ltd(1972) 82

Welch v Bank of England(1955) 82

Crabtree-Vickers Pty Ltd v Australian Direct Mail Advertising and Addressing Co Pty Ltd(1975) 83

Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis v Charles(1977) 83

Miles v Mcllwraith(1883) 84

Colonial Bank v Cady and Williams(1890) 84

Woodhouse Ltd v Nigerian Product Ltd(1972) 84

Smith v Prosser(1907) 84

Gompetz v Cook(1904) 84

Perry V Holl(1860) 84

Clarke,Re,The Debtor v Aston Son Ltd(1967) 84

Russo-Chinese Bank Ltd v Li Yau Sam(1910) 84

Porter v Moore(1904) 84

Dao Heng Bank Ltd v Hui Kwai-wing(1977) 84

Bloomenthal v Ford(1897) 84

Jacobs v Morris(1902) 85

Lloyds Bank Ltd v Chartered Bank of India,Australia and China, The(1929) 85

Underwood(AL) Ltd v Bank of Liverpool(1924) 85

Lowe v Bouverie(1891) 85

Danby v Coutts Co(1885) 85

Overbrooke Estates Ltd v Glencombe Properties Ltd(1974) 85

5.法律自动构成的代理 87

5.2.一般的为形势所迫的代理原则？ 87

5.1.妻子 87

5.3.为形势所迫的代理的要素 89

Hastings v Seamans Village(1946) 91

Hawtayne v Bourne(1841) 91

Sachs v Miklos(1948) 91

Great Northern Railway Co v Swaffield(1874) 91

China Pacific SA v Food Corpn of India, The Winson(1981) 91

条例表(汉英对照) 91

Prager v Blatspiel,Stamp Heacock Ltd(1924) 91

Lapraik v Burrows,The Australia(1859) 92

Australian Steam Navigation Co v Morse(1872) 92

Munro v Willmot(1949) 92

Sims Co v Midland Railway Co(1913) 92

Springer v Great Western Railway Co(1921) 92

Tronson v Dent(1853) 92

6.代理人的权力 93

6.1.实有权力 94

6.2.表面权力 104

条例表(英汉对照) 104

Watteau v Fenwick(1893) 106

6.4.代理本质势力 106

6.3.法律自动赐予的权力 106

Edmunds v Bushell(1865) 107

缩写 107

Bryant, Powis Bryant v La Banque du Peuple(1893) 111

Boden v French(1851) 111

Howard v Baillie(1796) 111

Chan Pak Mo v Standard Chartered Asia Ltd(1987) 111

International Paper Co v Spicer(1906) 111

Dowson Jenkins Contract,Re(1904) 111

Jonmenjoy Loondoo v Watson(1884) 111

European Asian Bank v Punjab Sind Bank(1893) 111

Attwood v Munnings(1827) 111

第七条 111

Ching Mei Bo v Lai Yuen Wah(1957) 112

Benmag Ltd v Barda(1955) 112

Palgrave Brown Son Ltd v SS Turid(1922) 112

Cunliffe-Owcn v Teather Greenwood(1967) 112

Helyear v Hawkes(1803) 112

Bank of New South Wales v Owston(1879) 112

Wiltshire v Sims(1808) 112

London Export Corp Ltd v Jubilee Coffee Roasting Co Ltd(1958) 112

Keen v Mear(1920) 112

Harker v Edwards(1887) 112

Neilson v James(1882) 112

Woodin v Burford(1834) 112

Mullens v Miller(1882) 112

Hamer v Sharp(1874) 112

Abrahams v Spitz(1963) 112

Rosenbaum v Belson(1900) 112

Bowring v Shepherd(1871) 112

Thuman v Best(1907) 112

Lacey v Hill(1874) 112

Daun v Simmins(1879) 113

Australian Bank of Commerce v Perel(1926) 113

Banbury v Bank of Montreal(1919) 113

Bank of Montreal v Young(1966) 113

Killick Co v Price(WR) Co(1896) 113

Rhodian River Shipping Co SA v Halla Maritime Corp,The Rhodian River(1984) 114

Kinahan Co Ltd v parry(1910) 114

McLaughlin v Gentles(1920) 114

Lloyds Bank Ltd v Swiss Bankverein(1912) 114

Johnston v Reading(1893) 114

Hubbard v Tenbrook(1889) 115

7.代理人对委讬人的义务 117

7.1.履行的义务 117

Smith v Lascelles(1788) 118

Junior Books Ltd v Veitchi Ltd(1983) 119

Callander v Oelrichs(1838) 119

Anns v Merton London Borough(1978) 119

Hood v West End Motor Car Packing Co(1917) 119

Hougland v RR Low(Luxury Coaches) Ltd(1962) 125

7.2.受讬信义的义务 131

Phipps v Boardman(1967) 133

Keech v Sandford(1726) 140

Canadian Aero Service Ltd v O Malley(1973) 142

Regal(Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver(1967) 142

防止贿赂条例(一九八七年修订版，第二百零一章) Prevention of Bribery and Corrupt Practices Ordinance(Cap 201 of the Revised Edition 1987) 148

第九条 148

Printers Finishers Ltd v Holloway(1965) 150

Industrial Development Consultants v Cooley(1972) 157

Boston Deep Sea Fishing Ice Co v Ansell(1888) 158

Hippisley v Knee Brothers(1905) 158

Demerara Bauxite Co v Louisa Hubbard(1923) 159

7.3.行政义务 161

起诉期限条例(一九八六年修订版，第三百四十九章) Limitation Ordinance(Cap 347 of the Revised Edition 1986) 167

7.4.次代理人 167

第四(2)条 167

第二十(1)条 167

Balsamo v Medici(1984) 170

Baring v Corrie(1818) 171

Cooke Sons v Eshelby(1887) 171

Yuen Kun-yen v Attorney General of Hong Kong(1988) 174

Norwest Refrigeration v Bain Dawes(1984) 174

Coggs v Bernard(1703) 174

Curran v Northern Ireland Housing(1987) 174

Leigh and Sillavan Ltd v Aliakmon Ltd(1986) 174

Corlett v Gordon(1813) 174

Candlewood Corpn v Mitsui Ltd(1986) I AC I 174

D F Estates v Church Commissioners(1988) 174

Gomer v Pitt Scott(1922) 174

London Borough of Bromley v Ellis(1971) 174

Peabody Fund v Sir Linday Parkinson Ltd(1985) 174

Elsee v Gatward(1793) 174

Cohen v Kittell(1889) 174

Morten v Hilton Gibbes Smith(1937) 175

Boyce v Rendells(1983) 175

Bexwell v Christie(1776) 175

Moore v Mourgue(1776) 175

Bertram v Godfray(1830) 175

Deacon (RH) Co Ltd v Varga(1974) 175

Fray v Voules(1859) 175

Andrew Master Hones Ltd v Cruickshank(1979) 175

Commonwealth Portland Cement Co Ltd v Weber Lohmann Co Ltd (1905) 176

Argyll(Duchess of) v Beuselinck(1972) 176

Brogden, Re,Billing v Brogden(1888) 176

Hart v Frame(1839) 176

Beal v The South Devon Railway Company(1864) 176

Cock Russell Co v Bray Cibb Co Ltd(1920) 176

Lanphier v Phipos(1838) 176

Wong(Edward) Finance Co Ltd v Johnson Stokes Master(1984) 176

Chaudhry v Prabhakar(1989) 176

Heys v Tindall(1861) 176

Overend Gurney Co v Gibb(1872) 176

Dampskihsselskab Halla v Catsell Co(1928) 176

Carlile Steamship Co v Simpson Spence Young(1926) 176

Learoyd v Whiteley(1887) 176

Pike v Stephens(1848) 176

Lee v Walker(1872) 176

Solomon v Barker(1826) 176

Allam Co v Europa Poster Services Ltd(1968) 177

Capp v Topham(1805) 177

Quebec and Richmond Railraod Co v Quinn(1858) 177

McCann(John) Co v Pow(1974) 177

Henderson v Barnewall(1827) 177

Hillcrest General Leasing Ltd v Guelph Investments Ltd(1971) 177

Ecossaise Steamship Co Ltd v Lloyd,Low Co(1890) 177

London County Council v Hobbis(1886) 177

Solly v Rathbone(1814) 177

Vine v National Dock Labour Board(1957) 177

Catlin v Bell(1815) 177

Solley v Wood(1852) 177

Wray v Kemp(1884) 177

English v Dedham Vale Properties Ltd(1978) 178

Bray v Ford(1896) 178

New Zealand Netherlands Society Oranje Inc v Laurantius Cornelius Kuys(1973) 178

Hall v Hallet(1784) 178

Jirna Ltd v Mister Donut of Canada Ltd(1971) 178

Christie v McCann(1972) 178

Dunne v English(1874) 178

Allison v Clayhills(1907) 178

Coomber,Re,Coomber v Coomber(1911) 178

Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corp(1984) 178

Thompson v Meade(1891) 179

Barber,Re,Burgess v Vinicome(1886) 179

Savery v King(1856) 179

Gray v New Augarita Porcupine Mines Ltd(1952) 179

Delves v Gray(1902) 179

Parker v Mckenna(1874) 179

Williams v Barton(1927) 179

Gates, Re,Arnold v Gates(1933) 179

Tyrell v Bank of London(1862) 179

Coleman v Myers(1977) 179

Crosskill v Bower(1862) 179

Cradock v Piper(1850) 179

Postlethwaite,Re,postlewhwaite v Rickman(1888) 179

Jacobus Marler Estates Lim v Marler(1916) 179

Robinson v Randfontein Est GM Co Ltd(1921) 179

Montesquieu v Sandys(1811) 179

Gillett v Peppercorne(1840) 179

Proctor v Brain(1828) 179

Broughton v Broughton(1855) 179

Clark v Carlon(1860) 179

Williamson v Hine(1891) 179

Gluckstein v Barnes(1900) 179

Sybron Corp v Rochem Ltd(1984) 179

Hill,Re,Claremont v Hill(1934) 179

Christophers v White(1847) 179

Cane v Allen(1814) 179

Armstrong v Jackson(1917) 179

Carter v Palmer(1842) 179

Brown v Inland Revenue Comrs(1965) 180

New Zealand Australian Land Co v Watson(1881) 180

Quistclose Investments Ltd v Rolls Razor Ltd(1970) 180

Shallcross v Oldham(1862) 180

North American Land Timber Co Ltd v Watkins(1904) 180

Imagic v Futuretronics(1983) 180

AB Consolidated Ltd v Europe Strength Food Co Pty Ltd(1978) 180

Shackell v Howe Thornton palmer(1908) 180

R v Hall(1937) 180

Hobday v Peters(No 1)(1860) 180

Gothenburg Commercial Company,Re(1881) 180

Henry v Hammond(1913) 180

Corsellis,Re, Lawton v Elwes(1887) 180

Cotton,Re,Ex p Cooke(1913) 180

Syke s,Re,Sykes v Sykes(1909) 180

Foley v Hill(1848) 180

Luddy s Trustee v Peard(1886) 180

Lees v Nuttall(1829) 180

Robb v Green(1895) 180

Kirkham v Peel(1880) 180

Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd(1980) 181

Luxor(Eastbourne) Ltd v Cooper(1941) 181

Cook v Deeks(1916) 181

Peso Silver Mines Ltd v Cropper(1966) 181

Industries and General Mortgage Co Ltd v Lewis(1949) 182

Blyth Chemicals Ltd v Bushnell(1933) 182

Fitzroy Bessmer Steel etc Co Ltd,Re(1884) 182

Mahesan S/O Thambiah v Malaysia Housing Society(1979) 182

Tarkwa Main Reef(Ltd) v Merton(1903) 182

Thomson,Re,Thomson v Allen(1930) 182

Salford(Mayor etc of) v Lever(1891) 182

Aberdeen Town Council v Aberdeen University(1877) 182

Russell v Austwick(1826) 182

Attorney General v Goddard(1929) 182

Reading v Attorney General(1951) 182

Canadian Oil Works Corp,Re, Hay s Case(1875) 182

Harrington v Victoria Graving Dock Co(1878) 182

Hovenden Sons v Millhoff(1900) 182

Shipway v Broadwood(1899) 182

Grant v The Gold Exploration Development Syndicate Ltd(1900) 183

Jordy v Vanderpump(1920) 183

Keogh v Dalgety Co Ltd(1916) 183

West Jewell Tin Mining Co,Re(1878) 183

Eden v Ridsdales Railway Lamp Lighting Co Ltd(1889) 183

Rowland v Chapman(1901) 183

Baring v Stanton(1876) 183

Copp v Lynch(1882) 183

North Australian Territory Co,Re,Archer s Case(1892) 183

Fraser v Evans(1969) 183

Li Yan-wai,Eric v Genesis Films Ltd(1987) 183

Owen v Trickett(1908) 183

Domestic Services Ltd,Re(1931) 183

Green (E) Son Ltd v Tugham(G) Co(1913) 183

Saltman Engineering Coy Ld v Campbell Engineering Coy Ld (1948) 183

Emma Silver Mining Co v Grant(1879) 183

Albert(Prince) v Strange(1849) 183

Rex Co v CH Muirhead(1927) 183

Coco v Clark(AN)(Engineers)Ltd(1969) 183

Parkdale,The(1897) 183

Pearson s Case(1877) 183

Great Western Insurance Co v Cunliffe(1874) 183

Lewis v Smith(1849) 184

Ansell Rubber Co Pty Ltd v Allied Rubber Industries Pty Ltd(1967) 184

Weld-Blundell v Stephens(1920) 184

Floydd v Cheney(1970) 184

Ashburton(Lord) v Pape(1913) 184

Royal products v Midland Bank(1981) 184

Tournier v National Provincial and Union Bank of England(1924) 184

Attorney General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd(No2)(1989) 184

United Sterling Corp Ltd v Felton(1974) 184

Lyanll v IRC(1971) 184

Harris Trustees Ltd v Power Packing Services Ltd(1970) 184

Cranleigh Precision Engineering Ltd v Bryant(1966) 184

Merrywheather v Moore(1892) 184

Taylor v Blacklow(1836) 184

Evitt v Price(1827) 184

Measures Brothers,Ltd v Measures(1910) 184

Barker v Gibbons(1972) 184

Moody v Cox Hatt(1917) 185

Haslam Hier·Evans,Re(1902) 185

Harrods Ltd v Lemon(1931) 185

Parry·Jones v Law Society(1969) 185

Hunter v Mann(1974) 185

Robertson v Robertson(1924) 185

Len Pugh Real Estate Ltd v Ronvic Construction Co Ltd(1974) 185

L D Associates v Chan Man Chon Mandalena(1987) 185

Stevenson Jordan and Harrison Ltd v Macdonald(1952) 185

Fullwood v Hurley(1928) 185

Lamb v Evans(1893) 185

Richard Ellis Ltd v Van Hong Tuon(1987) 185

Burrell v Burrell s Trustees(1915) 185

North and South Co v Berkeley(1971) 185

Regier v Campbell-Stuart(1939) 186

Hesse v Briant(1856) 186

Selsey(Lord) v Rhoades(1824) 186

James,Ex p (1803) 186

Blackham v Haythorpe(1917) 186

Blair v Martin(1929) 186

Andrews v Mowbray(1807) 186

Holder v Holder(1968) 186

Pisani v Attorney General for Gilbraltar(1874) 186

Gallard,Re,Ex p Gallard(1897) 186

Doughan v MacPherson(1902) 186

Dally v Wonham(1863) 186

Tanti v Carlson(1945) 186

McKenzie v McDonald(1927) 186

Imperial Mercantile Credit Assn v Coleman(1873) 186

Maddeford v Austwick(1826) 186

Bloy s Trust,Re(1849) 186

Imeson v Lister(1920) 186

Oliver v Court(1820) 186

Bennett, Ex p (1805) 186

Sanderson v Walker(1807) 186

Sewell v Agricultural Bank of Western Australia(1930) 186

Chesterfield Boythorpe Colliery Co v Black(1877) 187

Broun v Kennedy(1864) 187

Meinhard v Salmon(1928) 187

Turnbull v Garden(1869) 187

Williams v Stevens(1866) 187

White v Lincoln(1803) 188

Federal Supply and Cold Storage Co v Angehrn Piel(1911) 188

Nordisk Insulin v Beancard(Cl)(1953) 188

Farrar v Farrars Ltd(1880) 188

Chu,Ronald Li-Kai v Chiu, Deacon Te-Ken(1986) 188

Walden Properties Ltd v Beaver Properties Pty Ltd(1973) 188

Boles and British Land Co s Contract, Re(1902) 188

Chedworth(Lord) v Edwards(1802) 188

McMaster v Byrne(1952) 188

Bousfield v Wilson(1846) 189

Hunter v Welsh(1816) 189

Andrew v Robinson(1812) 189

Wilkinson v North Suburban properties Ltd(1959) 189

Nickolson v Knowles(1820) 189

Chantrey Martin v Martin(1953) 189

Leicestershire CC v Faraday (Michael) Partners Ltd(1941) 189

Horsfall,Ex p(1827) 189

Beresford(Lady) v Driver(1851) 189

Gray v Haig(1854) 189

Ellis Ellis,Re(1908) 189

Blaustein v Maltz,Mitchell Co(1937) 189

Wolfe v Findlay(1847) 189

Dadswell v Jacobs(1887) 189

Eames v Hacon(1881) 189

James Co v Chinecrest(1979) 189

Turner v Burkinshaw(1867) 189

Varden v Parker(1798) 189

Burnand, Re, Ex p Baker, Sutton Co(1904) 189

Dale v Sollet(1767) 189

Gibbon v Pease(1905) 189

Anglo·American Asphalt Co Ltd v Crowley Russell Co Ltd(1945) 190

Gething v Keighley(1878) 190

Ovington v Bell(1812) 190

Attenborough v St Katharine s Dock Co(1878) 190

McKellar v Wallace(1853) 190

Parkinson v Hanbury(1867) 190

Hunter v Belcher(1864) 190

Tanner v European Bank(1866) 190

Mozeley v Cowie(1877) 190

Mersey Docks and Harbour Board,Ex p(1899) 190

Jenkins v Gould(1827) 190

Davies,Ex p,Sadler,Re(1881) 190

Siqueira v Noronha(1934) 190

Hardwicke(Lord) v Vernon(1798) 190

Williamson v Barbour(1877) 190

Farquahar v East India Co(1845) 190

East-India Co v Mainston(1676) 190

Beaumont v Boultbee(1802) 191

Schwensen v Ellinger,Heath,Western Co(1949) 191

Coleman v Mellersh(1850) 191

Powell Thomas v Jones(Evan) Co(1905) 191

第二十(2)条 191

Stainton v Carron Company(1857) 191

Morris v Martin (CW) Sons Ltd(1966) 191

Lee Cooper v Jeakins (CH) Sons(1965) 191

Moukatoff v BOAC(1967) 191

Mutual Aid Permanent Benefit Building Society,Re(1883) 192

Robbins v Fennell(1847) 192

Schmaling v Thomlinson(1815) 192

Chan King Har v Mansion House Securities Ltd(1986) 192

Yau May Yue v Chow Shu Ng(1961) 192

Fisher v Smith(1878) 192

Westwood v Bell(1815) 192

Cairns, Noble Co Ltd v Ashwin Co(1920) 192

Mitchell,Re,Mitchell v Mitchell(1884) 192

Mildred Goyeneche Co v Maspons(1883) 192

Anderson v Sutherland(1897) 192

Mann v Forrester(1814) 192

Crossley v Magniac(1893) 192

Collins v Brook(1860) 192

Meyerstein v The Eastern Agency Co Ltd(1884) 193

Matthews v Haydon(1796) 193

National Employers Mutual General Insurance Assn Ltd v Elphinstone(1929) 193

British Road Services Ltd v Arthur V Crutchley Co Ltd(1968) 193

Edwards Real Estate Ltd v Bamtar Holdings Ltd(1978) 193

Adams(Durham) Ltd v Trust Houses Ltd(1960) 193

Calico Printers Association Ltd v Barcalys Bank(1931) 193

Speight v Gaunt(1883) 193

Swire v Francis(1877) 193

Cheshire(T) Co v Vaughan Bros Co(1920) 193

Mackersy v Ramsays(1843) 193

8.委讬人的补救 195

8.1.委讬人可得到的补救 195

Esso Petroleum v Mardon(1976) 200

Wallersteiner v Moir(No 2)(1975) 204

8.2.补救的性质：就人或就物 205

Chase Manhattan Bank NA v Israel·British Bank Ltd(1980) 208

8.3.累积的或择一的补救 210

Stansfield(Eric V) v South East Nursing Home Services Ltd(1986) 212

Andrews v Ramsay Co(1903) 212

Keppel v Wheeler(1927) 212

Temperley v Blackrod Manufacturing Co Ltd(1907) 212

Heath v Parkinson(1927) 212

Rhodes v Macalister(1923) 212

Stange v Lowitz(1898) 212

Underwood Son Piper v Lewis(1894) 212

Nitedals Taendstidfabrik v Bruster(1906) 213

Jarvis v Moy Davies Smith Vandervell Co(1936) 213

Howell v Young(1826) 213

Denmark Productions Ltd v Boscobel Productions Ltd(1969) 213

Groom v A Crocker(1939) 213

Davies v Lock(1844) 213

Cheshire(T) Co v Vaughan Bros Co(1919) 213

Page One Records Ltd v Britton(1968) 213

Chinnock v Sainsbury(1860) 213

Fraser v Furman(BN)(Productions) Ltd(1967) 213

O Sullivan v Management Agency Music Ltd(1985) 213

Laskin v Bache Co Inc(1971) 213

Mortimer v Beckett(1920) 213

Peninsular Oriental Steam Navigation Co v Johnson(1937) 213

Compania Financiera Soleada SA v Hamoor Tanker Corpn Inc,The Borag (1981) 213

Bean v Wade(1885) 213

Everett v Hogg Robinson(Insurance)(1973) 213

Bagot v Stevens Scanlan Co Ltd(1966) 214

Midland Bank v Hett Stubbs Kemp(1979) 214

Macpherson Kelly v Prunty and Associates(1983) 214

Bartram Sons v Lloyd(1904) 214

Tai Hing Cotton Mill Ltd v Liu Chong Hing Bank Ltd(1986) 214

McPherson v Watt(1877) 214

Clark v Kirby-Smith(1964) 214

Cook v Swinfen(1967) 214

Tufton v Sperni(1952) 214

Panama South Pacific Telegraph Co v India Rubber etc Co(1875) 214

Birtchnell v Equity Trustees, Executors Agency Co Ltd(1929) 215

Cape Breton Co, Re(1885) 215

Burland v Earle(1902) 215

Cavendish Bentinck v Fenn(1887) 215

Lister Co v Stubbs(1890) 215

Silkstone Haigh Moor Coal Co v Edey(1900) 216

Burdick v Garrick(1870) 216

Docker v Somes(1834) 216

Moons v De Bernales(1826) 216

Edgell v Day(1865) 216

Potters v Loppert(1973) 216

Webster v British Empire Mutual Life Assurance Co(1880) 216

Cook v Addison(1869) 216

Hardwicke(Lord) v Vernon(1808) 216

Harsant v Blaine MacDonald Co(1887) 216

Peares v Green(1819) 216

Barclay v Harris Cross(1916) 216

Townsend,Re(1809) 216

Waddell v Blockey(1879) 216

Davis, Re, Davis v Davis(1902) 216

Lupton v White(1808) 217

Power v Power(1884) 217

Taylor v Plumer(1815) 217

Lockey v Lockey(1719) 217

Norwegian Government v Calcutta Marine Eng Co Ltd(1960) 217

Metropolitan Bank v Heiron(1880) 217

9.委讬人对代理人的义务 219

9.1.酬劳 219

9.2.补偿 227

Way v Latilla(1937) 228

Padwick v Stanley(1852) 228

Wilkinson v Martin(1837) 228

Burchell v Gowrie Blockhouse Collieries,Ltd(1910) 228

Kofi Sunkersette Obu v A Strauss Co Ltd(1951) 228

Green v Bartlett(1863) 228

Taplin v Barrett(1889) 228

Marsh v Jelf(1862) 228

Padwick v Hurst(1854) 228

Ackroyd Sons v Hasan(1960) 228

Marshall v Parsons(1841) 228

Hodges(GT) Sons v Hackbridge Park Residential Hotel Ltd(1940) 229

French(L) Co v Leeston Shipping Co Ltd(1922) 229

Stirling v Maitland(1814) 229

Alpha Trading Ltd v Dunnshaw-Patten Ltd(1981) 229

Shackleton Aviation Ltd v Maitland Drewery Aviation Ltd(1964) 229

Hooker(LJ) Ltd v Adamas(WJ) Estates pty Ltd(1976) 229

Queen of Spain v Parr(1869) 229

Torllope(George) Sons v Caplan(1936) 229

Hampton Sons Ltd v George(1939) 229

Lord v Trippe(1977) 229

Southern Foundries(1926) Ltd v Shirlaw(1940) 229

Sovereign Life Assurance Co,Re,Salters Claim(1891) 229

Martin v Tucker(1885) 229

Houlder(Howard) Partners Ltd v Manx Isles Steamship Co(1923) 229

Bentall,Horsley Baldry v Vicary(1931) 229

Wilson v Harper Son Co(1908) 230

Duncan v Hill(1873) 230

Lott v Outhwaite(1893) 230

Levy v Goldhill(1917) 230

Crocker Horlock Ltd v Lang (B) Co Ltd(1949) 230

Pettman v Keble(1850) 230

Young v Cole(1837) 230

Barrett v Gilmour Co(1901) 230

Reynolds v Smith(1893) 230

Rivoli Hats Ltd v Gooch(1953) 230

Sellers v London Counties Newspapers(1951) 230

Gold v Life Assurance Co of Pennsylvania(1971) 230

Adams v Morgan Co(1924) 230

Clayton Newbury Ltd v Findlay(1953) 230

Thacker v Hardy(1878) 230

Bronester Ltd v Priddle(1961) 230

Roberts v Elwells Engineer Ltd(1972) 230

10.2.追讨赔偿的诉讼 231

10.1.追讨酬劳及补偿的诉讼 231

10.3.留置权 231

10.代理人可得的补救 231

Hope(John D) Co v Glendinning(1911) 236

Cowell v Simpson(1809) 236

Kruger v Wilcox(1755) 236

Brando v Barnett(1846) 236

Curwen v Milburn(1889) 236

London Chartered Bank of Australia v White(1879) 237

Madden v Kempster(1807) 237

Albemarle Supply Co v Hind Co(1928) 237

Bowes,Re, Strathmore(Earl of) v Vane(1886) 237

Morris,Re(1908) 237

Dixon v Stansfield(1850) 237

Weeks v Goode(1859) 237

11.1.合同 239

11.委讬人与第三者的关系 239

第六(1)条 241

第二十六条 241

第九十七(1)条 242

第二十四条 242

第五条 246

民事义务(分担)条例(一九八四年修订版，第三百七十七章) Civil Liability (Contribution) Ordinance (Cap 377 of the Revised Edition 1984) 246

Humble v Hunter(1848) 249

Thomson v Davenport(1829) 254

Armstrong v Stokes(1872) 255

11.2.财产的处置 259

第三(1)条 263

第二(1)条 264

货物代理商条例(一九六四年修订版，第四十八章) Factors Ordinance(Cap 48 of the Revised Edition 1964) 264

第二十七(1)条 266

第二十七(2)条 266

11.3.民事侵权行为 266

第二十四(1)条 266

Grant v Norway(1851) 269

11.4.察觉及承认 271

第二十八(1)条 274

Glover v Langford(1892) 278

Filby v Hounsell(1896) 278

Teheran-Europe Co Ltd v Belton(ST)(Tractors) Ltd(1968) 278

Lovesy v Palmer(1916) 278

Higgins v Senior(1841) 278

Potter v Duffield(1874) 278

Rimmer v Bruckner(1858) 278

11.5.导致代理人违背义务 278

Basma v Weekes(1950) 278

Castlespring Enterprises Ltd v Core Resource (HK) Ltd (1987) 278

Dale v Humfrey(1858) 278

Irvine Co v Watson Sons(1880) 279

Beswick v Beswick(1968) 279

Heald v Kenworthy(1855) 279

Miller v Douglas(1886) 279

Davison v Donaldson(1882) 279

Wilde v Gibson(1848) 279

Harmer v Armstrong(1933) 279

Horsfall v Fauntleroy(1830) 279

Chesterfield and Midland Silkstone Colliery Co Ltd v Hawkins(1865) 279

Sinclair s Life Policy,Re(1938) 279

Apthorp v Neville Co(1907) 279

Archer v Stone(1898) 279

Debenham s Ltd v PerKins(1925) 280

Benton v Campbell,Parker Co(1925) 280

Wyatt v Hertford(1802) 280

Pearson v Scott(1879) 280

Sanderson v Bell(1833) 280

Butwick v Grant(1924) 280

Smyth v Anderson(1849) 280

Barker v Greenwood(1837) 280

Drinkwater v Goodwin(1775) 280

Dresser v Norwood(1864) 280

Hudson v Granger(1821) 280

Williams v Evans(1866) 280

Murray v Delta Copper Co Itd(1925) 280

Mynn v Joliffe(1834) 280

Allen v FO Hearn Co(1937) 281

Tomlinson (A) Hauliers v Hepburn(1966) 281

Pople v Evans(1968) 281

Dyster v Randall(1926) 282

Drughorn (Fred) Ltd v Rederiaktiebolaget Transatlantic(1919) 282

Wasa (O/V) SS Co Ltd v Newspaper Pulp Wood Export Ltd(1949) 282

Said v Butt(1920) 282

Calder v Dobell(1871) 282

Epps v Rothnie(1945) 282

Murphy v Rae(1967) 282

Nash v Dix(1898) 282

Montgomerie v United Kingdom Mutual Steamship Assn(1891) 282

Danziger v Thompson(1944) 282

Greer v Downs Supply Co(1927) 282

Finzel,Berry Co v Eastcheap Dried Fruit Co(1962) 282

Collins v Associated Greyhound Racecourses,Ltd(1930) 282

MacClure v Schemeil(1871) 283

O Herlihy v Hedges(1803) 283

Rabone v Williams(1785) 283

Neilson v Powell(1784) 283

Coates v Lewes(1808) 283

Atkinson v Cotesworth(1825) 283

Browning v Provincial Insurance Co of Canada(1873) 283

Kendall v Hamilton(1879) 283

Montagu v Forwood(1893) 284

Semenza v Brinsley(1865) 284

Priestley v Fernie(1865) 284

Morgan v Lifetime Building Supplies Ltd(1967) 284

Smerthurst v Mitchell(1859) 284

George v Claggett(1797) 284

Kaltenbach Fischer Co v Lewis(1885) 284

Lord Cyril Carpet Sales v Browne(1966) 284

Clarkson Booker Ltd v Andjel(1964) 284

Pyxis Special Shipping Co Ltd v Dritsas Kaglis Bros Ltd,The Scaplake(1978) 285

Odell v Cormack Brothers(1887) 285

Lang v Smyth(1831) 285

Turner v Sampson(1911) 285

Hammond v Schofield(1891) 285

Tingey Co v John Chambers Co(1967) 285

Hutchison v The Colorado United Mining Co(1886) 285

Barclays Bank Ltd v Williams(1971) 285

Cross Co v Matthews Wallace(1904) 285

United Dominions Trust Ltd v Western(1976) 285

Barrington v Lee(1972) 285

Perry-Herrick v Attwood(1857) 285

Goodey v Garriock(1972) 285

Swanton Seed Service Ltd v Kulba(1968) 285

France v Clark(1884) 285

Rimmer v Webster(1902) 285

Fry v Smellie(1912) 285

Singer v Ashdown(JH) Hdwe Co(1953) 285

Robinson v Read(1829) 285

Lloyds and Scottish Finance Ltd v Williamson(1965) 286

Eastern Distributors Ltd v Goldring(1957) 286

Lowther v Harris(1927) 286

Pearson v Rose Young Ld(1951) 286

Brown Co v Bedford Pantechnicon Co(Ltd)(1889) 286

Belvoir Finance Ltd v Harold G Cole Ltd(1969) 286

Matchless ,The(1822) 286

Willmott v Barber(1880) 286

Biggs v Evans(1894) 286

Lamb v Attenborough(1862) 286

Budberg v Jerwood(1934) 286

Central Newbury Car Auctions Ltd v Unity Finance Ltd(1957) 286

Freeman v Appleyard(1862) 286

售卖货品条例(一九七七年修订版，第二十六章) Sale of Goods Ordinance (Cap 26 of the Revised Edition 1977) 286

第二(1)条 286

Beverley Acceptances Ltd v Oakley(1982) 286

Tsang Chuen v Li Po Kwai(1932) 286

Ramsden v Dyson(1866) 286

Rice v Rice(1854) 286

Cole v North Western Bank(1872) 286

Heap v Motorists Advisory Agency Limited(1923) 287

Worcester Finance v Cooden Engineering(1972) 287

Gorter v Attenborough(George) Son(1904) 287

Moody v Pall Mall Deposit Forwarding Co Ltd(1917) 287

Lloyds Bank Ltd v Bank of America NTSA(1938) 287

Oppenheimer v Attenborough Son(1908) 287

Astley Industrial Trust v Miller(1968) 287

Oppenheimer v Frazer Wyatt(1907) 287

第十条 287

第九条 287

第三(2)条 287

Nash v Barnes 1922) 287

第三(4)条 287

British Mutual Banking Co v Charnwood Forest Railway Co(1887) 287

Waddington Sons v Neale Sons(1907) 287

Lloyds Bank Ltd v Bank of America NTSA(1937) 287

Nea Tyhi, The(1982) 288

Kooragang Ltd v Richardson Wrench Ltd(1981) 288

Box v Midland Bank Ltd(1979) 288

Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd v Producers Citizens Co-operative Assurance Co of Australia Ltd(1931) 288

Hambro v Burnand(1904) 288

Barwick v English Joint Stock Bank(1867) 288

Uxbridge Permanent Benefit Building Society v Pickard(1939) 288

Texuna International Ltd v Wocom Commodities Ltd(1986) 288

Derry v Peek(1889) 289

Cornfoot v Fowke(1840) 289

London County Freehold Leasehold Properties Ltd v Berkeley Property Investment Co Ltd(1936) 289

Occidental Worldwide Investment Corporation v Skibs As/Avanti,The Siboen and The Sibotre(1976) 289

Armstrong v Strain(1951) 289

第十三条 289

法律修订及改革(综合) 条例(一九八六年修订版，第二十三章) Law Amendment and Reform(Consolidation) Ordinance (Cap 23 of the Revised Edition 1986) 289

Pearson Son Ltd v Dublin Corporation(1907) 289

Tanham v Nicholson(1872) 290

Rendal A/S v Arcos Ltd(1937) 290

Warrick v Warrick(1745) 290

Wall v New Ireland Assurance Co Ltd(1965) 290

Gladstone v King(1813) 290

Tsang Shiu Tim v Wong Kee(1960) 290

Blackburn Low Co v Vigors(1887) 290

Kennedy v Green(1834) 290

United Dominions v Shannon Caravans(1976) 290

Thompson v Cartwright(1863) 290

Saffron Walden Second Benefit Building Society v Rayner(1880) 290

Wyllie v Pollen(1863) 290

Waldy v Gray(1875) 290

Taylor v Yorkshire Insurance Co(1913) 290

Brewery Assets Corp,Re, Truman s Case(1894) 290

Grahame(JW)(English Financiers) Ltd v Ingram(1955) 290

Eagle Star Insurance Co v Spratt(1971) 291

Pennell v Stephens(1849) 291

Turvey v Dentons(1923) Ltd(1953) 291

Hampshire Land Co Ltd,Re(1896) 291

Anglo·Scottish Beet Sugar Corp v Spalding UDC(1937) 291

Eagle Star Insurance Co v Spratt(1975) 291

Eda Holdings Ltd v Etek Holdings Ltd(1989) 291

Marseilles Extension Railway Co,Re,Ex p Credit Foncier Mobolier of England(1871) 291

Jasperson v Dominion Tobacco Co(1923) 291

Ashton,Rc,Ex p McGowan(1891) 291

Fenwick Stobart Co,Re(1902) 291

12.代理人与第三者的关系 293

12.1.透露的委讬人 293

第二十六A(1)条 300

第二十六(2)条 300

第二十六(1)条 300

第二十六条 300

Bridges Salmon Ltd v Owners of the Swan (1968) 301

Collen v Wright(1857) 303

12.3.不透露的委讬人 305

12.2.代理人是真正的事主 305

Brandt(HO) Co v Morris(HN) Co Ltd(1917) 306

Cable Wireless Systems Ltd v Wu Man Kin Eddie(1989) 306

Lennard v Robinson(1855) 306

Gadd v Houghton(1876) 306

Maritime Stores Ltd v Marshal(HP) Co Ltd(1963) 306

Wake v Harrop(1862) 306

Lewis v Nicholson(1852) 306

Santa Carina,The(1977) 306

Tanner v Christian(1854) 306

Paice v Walker(1870) 306

Dragages et Travaux Publics v Gladhover Ltd(1988) 306

Universal Steam Navigation Co v Mckelvie(James) Co(1923) 306

Parker v Winlow(1857) 306

Whitehead v Izod,见 Chapman v Shepherd Wickberg v Shatsky(1969) 307

Spittle v Lavender(1821) 307

Lester v Balfour Williamson Merchant Shippers Ltd(1953) 307

Hall v Ashurst(1833) 307

Phonogram Ltd v Lane(1981) 307

Burrell v Jones(1819) 307

Oglesby v Yglesias(1858) 307

Iveson v Conington(1823) 307

International Railway Co v Niagara parks Commission(1941) 307

Marblestone Industries Ltd v Fairchild(1975) 307

Black v Smallwood(1965-1966) 307

Gullischen v Stewart Brothers(1884) 307

Polhill v Walter(1832) 308

Cheung Yiu Wing v Blooming Textiles Ltd(1975) 308

Hersom v Bemett(1955) 308

Elliott v Bax·Ironside(1925) 308

Steele v M Kinlay(1880) 308

第二十三条 308

Dunn v MacDonald(1897) 308

票据条例(一九六四年修订版，第十九章) Bills of Exchange Ordinance(Cap 19 of the Revised Edition 1964) 308

Appleton v Binks(1804) 308

Grice v Kenrick(1870) 309

Bowen v Morris(1810) 309

Coppin v Walker(1816) 309

Evans v Hooper(1875) 309

Short v Spackman(1831) 309

Coppin v Craig(1816) 309

Cooke v Wilson(1856) 309

Halbot v Lens(1901) 309

Repetto v Millar s Karri Jarrah Forests Ltd(1901) 309

Williams v Millington(1788) 309

Atkyns v Amber(1796) 309

Fawkes v Lamb(1862) 309

Firbank s Executors v Humphreys(1886) 309

Robinson v Rutter(1855) 309

Rasnoimport(v/o) v Guthrie Co Ltd(1966) 309

Albacruz,The(Cargo Owners) v Albazero(Owners)(1977) 309

Winkfield,The(1902) 309

Bramwell v Spiller(1870) 309

Provincial Insurance Co of Canada v Leduc(1874) 309

Fairlie v Fenton(1870) 309

Farley Health Products Ltd v Babylon Trading Co(1987) 310

Lilly Wilson Co v Smales Eeles Co(1892) 310

Spedding v Nevell(1869) 310

Simons v Patchett(1857) 310

Peto v Blades(1814) 310

McDonnell v McGuinness(1939) 310

Resolute Maritime Inc v Nippon Kaiji Kyokai,The Skopas(1983) 310

Godwin v Francis(1870) 310

Stuart v Haigh(1893) 310

Dodds Dodds v Millman(1964) 310

Starkey v Bank of England(1903) 310

第三(1)条 310

Hughes v Graeme(1864) 310

Bain v Fothergill(1874) 310

Mational Coffee Palalce Co,Re,Ex p Panmure(1883) 310

虚伪陈词条例(一九六九年修订版，第二百八十四章) Misrepresentation Ordinance(Cap 284 of the Revised Edition 1969) 310

Delta Construction Co Ltd v Lidstone et al(1979) 310

Schmaltz v Avery(1851) 311

Carr v Jackson(1852) 311

Harper Co v Vigers Bros(1909) 311

Bickerton v Burrell(1816) 311

Sharman v Brandt(1871) 311

Rayner v Grote(1846) 311

13.1.可以撤回的权力的终止 313

13.权力的终止 313

13.2.不可以撤回的权力 322

第四条 324

13.3.终止的后果 326

Joynson v Hunt Son(1905) 330

Keshen v Lipsky Co(1956) 330

Motion v Michaud(1892) 330

第五(4)条 330

第五(2)条 330

第五(1)条 330

Friend v Young(1897) 331

Crediton Gas Co v Crediton Urban Council(1928) 331

Berder Sportcraft Ltd s Agreement, Re(1947) 331

Smout v Ilbery(1842) 331

Yonge v Toynbee(1910) 331

Pool v Pool(1889) 331

Selfe v Colonial Ice Co(1894) 331

Staffordshire Area Health Authority v South Staffordshire Waterworks Co(1978) 331

Markwick v Hardington(1880) 331

Campanari v Woodburn(1854) 331

Paper Sales Corpn Ltd v Miller Bros Co(1962) Ltd(1975) 331

Martin-Baker Aircraft Co Ltd v Canadian Flight Equipment Ltd(1955) 331

Farrow v Wilson(1860) 331

Blades v Free(1829) 331

Foster v Bates(1843) 331

Boise Cascade Canada Ltd v The Queen in Right of Ontario (1979) 331

Douglas,Re,Ex p Snowball(1872) 331

Tasker v Shepherd(1861) 331

Bauman v Hulton Press Ltd(1952) 331

Sovfracht(v/o) v Van Udens Scheepvaarten Agentur Maatschappj(NV Gebr)(1943) 332

Marshall(Thomas)(Exports) Ltd v Guinle(1979) 332

McCall v The Australian Meat Co(Ltd)(1870) 332

Marshall v Glanville(1917) 332

Tingley v Muller(1917) 332

Gough s Garages Ltd v Pugsley(1930) 332

Sowman v David Samuel Trust Ltd(1978) 332

Edmiston v Wright(1807) 332

Frith v Frith(1906) 332

Morgan v Manser(1948) 332

Hangkam Kwingtong Woo v Liu Lan Fong(1951) 332

Nordman v Rayner and Sturges(1916) 332

破产条例(一九八六年修订版，第六章) Bankruptcy Ordinance(Cap 6 of the Revised Edition 1986) 332

Atlanic Underwriting Agencies v Companiadi Assicurazione di Milano SpA(1979) 332

Clea Shipping Corp v Bulk oil International Ltd,The Alaskan Trader(1984) 333

Sanders v Neale(Earnest A) Ltd(1974) 333

Decro-Wall International SA v Practitioners in Marketing Ltd(1971) 333

Gunton v Richmond-upon-Thames LBC(1982) 333

Brace v Calder(1895) 333

Attica Sea Carriers Corp v Ferrostal Poseidon Bulk Reederei GmbH(1976) 333

Hill v Parsons(CA) Co Ltd(1972) 333

Patent Floor Cloth Co Ltd,The,Re,Dean Gilbert s Claim(1872) 333

Inchbald v Western Neilgherry Coffee Co Ltd(1864) 333

White Carter(Councils) Ltd v McGregor(1962) 333

Francis v Kuala Lumpur Councillors(1962) 333

Reigate v Union Manufacturing Co(Ramsbottom) Ltd(1918) 334

Lazarus v Cairn Line of Steamships Ltd(1912) 334

Warren Co v Agdeshman(1922) 334

Nolan(Geo H) (1956)Ltd v Watson (HA) Co Ltd(1965) 334

General Publicity Service Ltd v Best s Brewery Co Ltd(1951) 334

Newman(RS) Ltd,Re,Raphael s Claim(1916) 334

Smart v Sandars(1848) 334

Gaussen v Morton(1830) 334

Premier Products Ltd,Re(1965) 334

Hannah s Empress Gold Mining and Development Co,Re Carmichael s Case(1896) 334

Rhodes v Forwood(1876) 334

Turner v Goldsmith(1891) 334

Scarf v Jardine(1882) 334

De Comas v Frost(1865) 334

English Scottish Aarine Insurance Co,Re,Ex p Macclure(1870) 334

Read v Anderson(1884) 335

Crowfoot v Gurney(1832) 335

Doward,Dickson Co v Williams Co(1890) 335

Watson v King(1815) 335

Taplin v Florence(1851) 335

Yates v Hoppe(1850) 335

Bilbie v Hasse Co(1889) 335

Overweg, Re,Haas v Durant(1900) 335

Kung Wing Chuen,Francis v Antony Louis Marden(1989) 336

14.合夥人 337

第六条 337

第七条 337

第四十七条 337

14.1.能力 338

社团条例(一九八八年修订版，第一百五十一章) Societies Ordinance (Cap 151 of the Revised Edition 1988) 339

第二(1)条 339

第三百四十五(1)条 339

14.2.代理的构成 340

第四条 341

移交产权及资产条例(一九八八年修订版，第二百十九章) Conveyancing and Property Ordinance(Cap 219 of the Revised Edition 1988) 342

第五条 342

Dale v Hamilton(1846) 342

第三(1)条 342

第五(1)条 342

第十六条 343

14.3.合夥人的权力 343

第十条 343

第九条 346

第二十九(1)条 347

第二十六(e)条 347

第二十六(f)条 347

第二十六(h)条 347

第二十八(2)条 347

第二十九(2)条 347

第二十六(g)条 347

第二十七条 347

14.4.合夥人的义务 347

第三十二条 348

第三十一(1)条 348

第四十五条 351

第四十四条 351

第二十六(i)条 353

14.5.合夥人的补救 353

第三十条 353

第四十三条 353

第三十七条 354

第十二条 355

14.6.合夥与第三者的关系 355

第十五条 356

第十八条 356

第十三条 357

第十一条 357

14.8.关系终止 357

14.7.合夥人的次义务 357

第三十五条(1)条 358

第三十五条(2)条 358

第三十六条 358

第三十四条(2)条 358

第三十四条(1)(c)条 358

第三十四条(1)(a)条 358

第三十四条(1)(b)条 358

第四十条 359

第三十九条 359

第三十八(3)条 359

第三十八(1)条 359

第四十一条 359

第十九(3)条 360

第十九(2)条 360

第三十八(2)条 360

第五(2)条 361

14.9.有限责任合夥 361

有限责任合夥商号条例(一九八一年修订版，第三十七章) Limited Partnership Ordinance(Cap 37 of the Revised Edition 1981) 361

第三(1)条 361

第三(2)条 361

第四条 361

第九条 361

第八条 361

第七条 361

第五(1)条 361

第六条 361

第五(6)(e)条 361

第五(3)条 361

第五(6)(d)条 361

第五(6)(c)条 361

第五(5)条 361

合夥经营条例(一九六四年修订版，第三十八章) Partnership Ordinance(Cap 38 of the Revised Edition 1964) 362

第三百四十五(2)条 362

Sadler v Lee(1843) 362

Chan Sau-Kut v Gray Iron Construction Engineering Co(1986) 362

Yim Wai·tsang v Lee Yuk·har(1973) 362

Johnson,Stokes Master v Trevor Ernest Boucher(1989) 362

Jones v Noy(1833) 362

De Choisy v Hynes(1937) 362

附表 362

Bank of England v Vagliano Brothers(1891) 362

第三条 362

Weiner v Harris(1910) 362

Waugh v Carver(1793) 363

Bonbonus,Ex p(1803) 363

Bond v Gibson(1808) 363

Rothwell v Humphreys(1795) 363

Forster v Hale(1880) 363

Gardiner v Childs(1837) 363

Dyke v Brewer and Tiddy(1849) 363

Carruthers v Sheddon(1815) 363

Gleadon v Tinkler(1817) 363

Cox v Hickman(1860) 363

Hunt v The Royal Exchange Assurance(1816) 363

Hooper v Lusby(1814) 363

Munro v Stein(1961) 363

Tredwen v Bourne(1840) 363

Sharp v Milligan(1856) 363

Ng So Kuen v Ng Luen Fong(1985) 363

Grace v Smith(1775) 363

Caddick v Skidmore(1857) 363

Gray v Smith(1889) 363

Mara v Browne(1896) 364

Bishop v Countess of Jeresy(1854) 364

Adansonia Fibre Co,Re(1874) 364

Baker v Charlton(1791) 364

Sifkin v Walker(1809) 364

Norton v Seymour(1847) 364

Backhouse v Charlton(1878) 364

Rhodes v Moules(1895) 364

Bourne, Re, Bourne v Bourne(1906) 364

Harman v Johnson(1853) 364

Higgins v Beauchamp(1914) 364

Dickinson v Valpy(1829) 364

Briggs Co,Re,Ex P Wright(1906) 364

Hogarth v Latham Co(1878) 364

Chippendale, Ex p,Re German Mining Co(1854) 364

Laws v Rand(1857) 364

Clough,Re, Bradford Commercial Banking Co v Cure(1885) 364

Brettel v Williams(1849) 364

Levy v Pyne(1842) 364

Lambert s Case(1690) 364

De Tastet v Carroll(1815) 364

Burmester v Norris(1851) 364

Wilson v Lewis(1840) 364

Forster v Mackreth(1867) 364

Fisher v Tayler(1843) 364

Wheatley v Smithers(1906) 364

Willet v Chambers(1778) 364

Brown v Byers(1847) 364

Eyre, Ex p (1842) 364

Hawkshaw v Parkins(1819) 365

Agace,Ex p(1792) 365

Niemann v Niemann(1889) 365

Hatton v Royle(1858) 365

Alliance Bank,Ltd v Kearsley(1871) 365

Arbuckle v Taylor(1815) 365

Bell s Indenture,Re,Bell v Hickley(1980) 365

Tomlinson v Broadsmith(1896) 365

Barker v Richardson(1827) 365

Campbell v McCreath(1975) 365

Thomas v Atherton(1878) 365

Beale v Caddick(1857) 365

Beckham v Drake(1841) 365

Brunswick(Duke of) v Slowman(1849) 365

Steiglitz v Egginton(1815) 365

Harrison v Jackson(1797) 365

Court v Berlin(1897) 365

Peele,Ex p(1802) 365

Strangford v Green(1677) 365

Watson v Woodman(1875) 365

Phillips v Clagett(1843) 365

Piercy v Fynney(1871) 365

Donaldson v Williams(1833) 365

Stead v Salt(1825) 365

Powell v Broadhurst(1901) 365

Garland v Jacomb(1873) 365

Adams v Bankart(1835) 365

Doe d Macleod v East London Waterworks Co(1828) 365

British American Oil Producing Co v Midway Oil Co(1938) 366

Fuller v Duncan(1891) 366

Purdon v Muller(1961) 366

Rowe v Wood(1795) 366

Trimble v Goldberg(1906) 366

Aas v Benham(1891) 366

M Lure v Ripley(1850) 367

Smith v Jeyes(1841) 367

Anderson v Anderson(1857) 367

Carmichael v Evans(1904) 367

Clegg v Fishwick(1849) 367

Gordon v Gonda(1955) 367

Perens v Johnson(1857) 367

Fawcett v Whitehouse(1829) 367

Marshall v Colman(1820) 367

Essell v Hayward(1860) 367

Lo Ling Leung·chai,Re(1980) 367

Law v Law(1905) 367

Knox v Gye(1872) 367

Lawson v Morgan(1815) 367

Lees v Laforest(1851) 367

Baring v Dix(1786) 368

Leary v Shout(1864) 368

Salomons v Nissen(1788) 368

Porthouse v Parker(1807) 368

Powles v Page(1846) 368

Cheesman v Price(1865) 368

Jacaud v French(1810) 368

Bignold v Waterhoues(1813) 368

Worcester Corn Exchange Co,Re(1853) 368

第十四条 368

Watney v Wells(1861) 368

第十七条 368

Baxter v West(1858) 368

Yenidje Tobacco Co Ltd,Re(1916) 368

Electric Telegraph of Ireland,Re(1956) 368

Amalgamated Syndicate,Re(1897) 368

Steele v Stuart(1866) 368

Alderson v Pope(1808) 368

Harrison v Tennant(1856) 368

Parkin v Carruthers(1800) 369

Tower Cabinet Co Ltd v Ingram(1949) 369

Chung Chih Yien v Tailor King(1967) 369

Warder v Stilwell(1857) 369

Blisset v Daniel(1853) 369

Sales v Crispi(1913) 370

Barfoot v Goodall(1811) 370

Graham v Hope(1792) 370

M lver v Humble(1812) 370

Gorham v Thompson(1791) 370

Townsend v Jarman(1900) 370

Boydell v Drummond(1808) 370

Newsome v Coles(1811) 370

Hart v Alexander(1837) 370

Burchell v Wilde(1900) 370

Williams v Keats(1817) 370

Fraser,Re,Ex p Central Bank of London(1892) 370

15.1.代理的构成及权力 373

15.公司董事及高级职员 373

Houghton Co v Nothard Lowe Wills Ltd(1928) 378

第二十(1)条 388

City Equitable Fire Insurance Co,Re(1925) 389

15.2.代理人的义务 389

Automatic Self-Cleansing Filter Syndicate Co Ltd v Cunninghame(1906) 391

Aberdeen Railway Co v Blaikie(1854) 402

Percival v Wright(1902) 406

第九(1)条 413

Brown v British Abrasive Wheel Co(1919) 417

Sidebottom v Kershaw Leese Co(1920) 417

Foss v Harbottle(1843) 420

15.3.委讬人的补救 420

15.4.公司与第三者 425

Ruben v Great Fingall Consolidated(1906) 426

15.5.董事与第三者的关系 429

15.6.关系终止 431

Gaiman v National Association for Mental Health(1971) 433

Great Wheal Polgrooth Ltd,Re(1883) 433

Great Western Forest of Dean Coal Con-sumer Society,Re,Carter s Case(1886) 433

Toppam Printing Co Ltd v Champion Dragon Development Ltd(1986) 433

1990成年年岁数(有关条文)条例(一九九零年第三十二号) Age of Majority(Related Provisions) Ordinance(No 32 of 1990) 433

Osborne v Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants(1909) 433

Broadlands Finance Ltd v Gisborne Aero Club Inc(1974) 433

第一百五十七C条 433

Morris v Kanssen(1946) 434

Channel Collieries Trust,Ltd v Dover,St Margaret s and Martin Mill Light Railway(1914) 434

Bodega Co Ltd, Re(1904) 434

第一百五十四条(2)条 434

第一百五十七条 434

第一百五十六(1)条 434

第一百五十五(3)条 434

第一百五十五(1)条 434

第一百五十四条B条 434

第一百五十四条A条 434

Tyne Mutual Steamship Insurance Association v Brown(Peter)(1896) 434

第一百五十七E条 434

第一百五十七F条 434

第一百五十三条 434

第一百五十三条(1)条 434

British Asbestos Co Ltd v Boyd(1903) 434

第二十三(1)(a)条 434

第一百五十八(5)条 434

Kanssen v Rialton(West End) Ld(1944) 434

Cunningham Co Ltd,Re,Simpson s Claim(1887) 435

Mahony v East Holyford Mining Co(1875) 435

Rosebank Television App Co v Orbit Sales Corp Ltd(1969) 435

Scottish Loan and Finance Co Ltd,Re(1944) 435

Dawson v African Consolidated Land and Trading Company(1898) 435

Burnside v Dayrell(1849) 436

Barnett, Hoares Co v South London Tramways Company(1887) 436

British Thomson.Houston Co v Federated European Bank Ld(1932) 436

Ho Wing Cheong v Graham Margot(1987) 436

Dey v Pullinger Engineering Co(1921) 436

Panorama Developments(Guildford) Ltd v Fidelis Furnishing Fabrics Ltd(1971) 436

Clay Hill Brick Co v Rawlings(1938) 436

Bank of New South Wales v Goulburn Valley Butter Co Proprietary Ltd(1902) 436

Daimler Company ,Ltd v Continental Tyre and Rubber Company(Great Britain) Ltd(1916) 436

Kleinwort Sons Co v Associated Automatic Machine Corp(1934) 436

Biggerstaff v Rowatt s Wharf, Ltd(1896) 436

第一百五十四条(1)条 436

County Palatine Loan and Discount Company,Re,Cartmell s Caes(1874) 437

Kreditbank Cassel GmbH v Schenkers(1927) 437

Ernest v Nicholls (1857) 437

Maidstone Buildings Provisions Ltd,Re(1971) 437

Liggett(B)(liverpool) Ltd v Barclays Bank(1928) 437

Royal British Bank, The v Turquand(1856) 437

Land Credit Company of Ireland,Re,Ex p Overend Gurney Co(1869) 438

Duck v Tower Galvanizing Company(1901) 438

Denham Co,Re(1883) 438

Turquand v Marshall(1859) 438

Cardiff Savings Bank,Re,Marquis of Bute s Case(1892) 438

County of Gloucester Bank v Rudry Merthyr Steam and House Coal Colliery Co(1895) 438

County Life Assurance Company,Re(1870) 438

Shaw(John) Sons(Salford) Ld v Shaw (1935) 439

Quin Axtens Limited v Salmon(1909) 439

Ward(Alexander) Co Ltd v Samyang Navigation Co Ltd(1975) 439

Black White and Grey Cabs Ltd v Fox(1969) 439

Huckerby v Elliot(1970) 439

Dovey v Cory(1901) 439

Marshall s Valve Gear Company,Limited v Manning,Wardle Co,Limited(1909) 439

Isle of Wight Railway Co v Tahourdin 439

Forest of Dean Coal Mining Co,Re(1879) 439

Joint Stock Discount Co v Brown(1869) 439

Municipal Freehold Land Co Ltd v Pollington(1890) 439

Hirschler v Birch(1987) 439

Briess v Woolley(1954) 440

公司条例(一九八四年修订版，第三十二章) Companies Ordinance(Cap 32 of the Revised Edition 1984) 440

第二(1)条 440

Tang Kam-yip v Yau Kung School(1986) 440

Canadian Land Reclaiming Colonizing Co, Re,Coventry Dixon s Case(1880) 440

Bell v Lever Brothers Ltd(1932) 440

Dafen Tinplate Co v Llanelly Steel Co(1920) 440

Fireman,Simon v Golden Rice Bowl Ltd(1987) 441

Lonrho Ltd v Shell Petro|eum Co Ltd(1980) 441

Roith(W M) Ltd,Re(1967) 441

Yorke(Stationers) Pty Ltd,Re(1965) 441

Wincham Shipbuilding, Boiler Salt Co,Re,Poole Jackson Whyte s Case(1878) 441

Walker v Wimbornc(1976) 441

European Central Railway Co,Re,Syke s Case(1872) 441

Brooks(William) Co Ltd, Re(1962) 441

Smith v Fawcett(1942) 441

Smith v Cock(1911) 441

Australian Fixed Trusts v Clyde Industries Ltd(1959) 441

Taunton v Royal Insurance Co(1864) 441

Shuttleworth v Cox Brothers Co(1927) 441

Clay v Rufford(1852) 442

Bamford v Bamford(1970) 442

Smith (Howard) Ltd v Ampol Petroleum Ltd(1974) 442

Mandarin Resources Corpn Ltd v Cheng Heng-soon,David(1988) 442

Tintin Exploration Syndicate,Limited v Sandys(1947) 442

Vestey s Settlement,Re,Lloyd s Bank Ltd v O Meara(1950) 442

Parke v Daily News Ltd(1962) 442

Dunstan v Houison(1901) 442

Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock(No 3)(1968) 442

Hutton v West Cork Railway Co(1883) 442

Oceanic Steam Navigation Co v Sutherberry(1880) 442

Thorby v Goldberg(1965) 443

Broadcasting Station 2Gb pty Ltd, Re(1964) 443

Scottish Co-operative Wholesale Society Ltd v Meyer(1959) 443

Levin v Clark(1962) 443

Galloway v Halle Concerts Society(1915) 443

Clark v Workman(1920) 443

Harris v North Devon Railway Co(1855) 443

Greenwell v Porter(1902) 443

Charterbridge Corpn Ltd v Lloyds Bank(1970) 443

Hivac Ltd V Park Royal Scientific Instruments Ltd(1946) 444

第一百五十七G条 444

第一百六十三D条 444

第一百五十七H条 444

第一百六十三C条 444

第一百六十一(1)条 444

Man Lue