PUNISHMENT RESTORATIVE JUSTICE AND THE MORALITY OF LAWPDF电子书下载

INTRODUCTION ERIK CLAES and TONY PETERS 1

1.Central Issues 1

2.Criminal Justice， Legality and Human Dignity 2

3.Restorative Justice and the Morality of Law 6

4.Punishment and the Morality of Law 9

PART ONE.CRIMINAL JUSTICE， LEGALITY， HUMAN DIGNITY 15

1.CRIMINAL JUSTICE， LEGALITY AND HUMAN DIGNITY ERIK CLAES 17

Introduction 17

1.Worries About Legality and the Rule of Law 19

2.Some Preliminary Remarks 23

3.Is Legality Still Adequate Enough for a Successful Administration of Criminal Justice？ 24

4.Does Legality Still Contain Enough Justifying Power to Guide and Constrain the Administration of Criminal Justice？ 29

5.The Idea of a Rights-conception of Legality 33

6.Can Legality Fit Person-relative Facts？ 36

7.Legality， Predictability and Human Dignity 39

8.Two Faces of （Respect for） Human Dignity 44

9.The Idea of a “Capability”-conception of Legality 50

Conclusion 52

2.PUNISHMENT， HUMAN DIGNITY， AND THE SOCIOLOGICAL IMAGINATION： A REPLY TO CLAES TOM DAEMs 57

1.The Challenge for Normative Theory 58

2.Punishment， Human Dignity， and Modernity 60

2.1.The Other Crisis： Punishment as a Public Issue 60

2.2.Respect for Human Dignity： “Private Trouble” or “Public Issue”？ 65

Conclusion 67

3.BACK TO BASICS： A REPLY TO CLAES SANDRA MARSHALL 69

PART TWO.RESTORATIVE JUSTICE AND THE MORALITY OF LAW 77

4.RESTORATIVE JUSTICE AND THE MORALITY OF LAW SERGE BROCHU 79

1.Morality 79

2.Recent Evolution of the Doctrine of Punitive Justice 80

3.Restorative Justice 81

4.Restorative Justice and the Morality of Justice Process 83

4.1.Taking Care of the Victim 83

4.2.Taking Care of the Offender 83

4.3.Taking Care of Society 84

Conclusion 85

5.RESTORATIVE JUSTICE AND THE MORALITY OF THE FAIR TRIAL： A REPLY TO BROCHU MIREILLE HILDEBRANDT 89

Introduction 89

1.Historical Perspective on Mediation and Fair Trial in Penal Matters 90

2.The Public Context of Restorative Justice and the Concept of the Legal Norm 91

3.Primacy of the Victim？ 93

4.The Morality and Effectiveness of Fair Trial and Restorative Punishment 94

5.Person- and Norm-relative Sensitivities 97

Concluding Remarks 99

6.RESTORATIVE JUSTICE AND THE MORALITY OF LAW： A REPLY TO BROCHU IVO AERTSEN and KRISTEL BEYENS 101

Introduction 101

1.Restorative Justice in Contemporary Context 101

1.1.Contemporary Punishment 101

1.2.Restorative Justice in Contemporary Society 102

1.2.1.The Appeal of the “Gemeinschaft” in Late Modern Societies 102

1.2.2.Victims and Moral Clarifications 104

1.2.3.The Questionable Legitimacy of Courts 105

1.2.4.Is there a Place for Restorative Justice Mechanisms in Contemporary Advanced-Urban Societies？ 105

2.Restorative Justice and Sentencing 106

2.1.The Need for some Integration 106

2.2.Sentencing： Retributive and/or Restorative？ 108

2.3.Types of Morality 111

3.A Belgian Proposal for Sentencing Reform 113

3.1.General Framework 114

3.2.Principles for a Communicative and Participative Sentencing / Criminal Justice System 115

3.3.A Place for Narratives in Court？ 115

3.4.Some Conditions for a Successful Restorative， thus Communicative and Participative Sentencing Process 117

PART THREE.PUNISHMENT AND THE MORALITY OF LAW 119

7.PUNISHMENT AND THE MORALITY OF LAW ANTONY DUFF 121

1.How Can Citizens Punish Each Other？ 122

2.Punishment and Communication 131

3.Retribution and Restoration 140

8.RETRIBUTIVISM AND THE QUALITY OF SOCIAL LIFE： A REPLY TO DUFF LODE WALGRAVE 145

1.Retributivism and Instrumentalism 145

2.What is a Wrong？ 147

3.Why Needs a Wrong to Be Punished？ 149

4.Punishment A Priorism as an Obstacle for Communication 151

5.Duff’s Communitarian Liberalism and the Top-down Approach in Retributivism 154

9.RETRIBUTIVE PUNISHMENT AND SYMBOLIC RESTORATION： A REPLY TO DUFF ARNOLD BURMS 157

10.DOES PUNISHMENT NEED HARD TREATMENT？ A REPLY TO DUFF BAS VAN STOKKOM 165

1.Why Do We Have to Rely on Retribution？ 166

2.What is Hard Treatment？ 167

3.Duff’s Account： Some Implausible Psychological Arguments 169

4.Repentance and Trust： Facilitating Two-way Communication 174

Conclusion 177

11.A RESPONSE TO WALGRAVE， VAN STOKKOM， AND BURMS ANTONY DUFF 179

PUNISHMENT， RESTORATIVE JUSTICE， AND THE MORALITY OF LAW： CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS RENE FOQUE 183

1.Introductory Remarks 183

2.The Need for a Normative Theory of Law 184

3.A Plea for a Reconstructive Theory of Law and the Role of General Principles 184

4.How the Language of the Law Institutionalises a Sense of Others 186

5.The Law as Symbolic Order 187

6.Participatory Citizenship， Moral Agency and the Principle of Human Dignity： Towards a Personalistic Conception of Law 189

7.The Risks of an Absolute Victimological Turn in Criminal Justice 193

8.The Meaning of Restorative in Restorative Justice： What Must Be Repaired？ 195

9.The Domain-specificity of Criminal Law as Public Law： A Necessary Condition for the Complementarity of Punishment and Restorative Justice 197

LIST OF THE CONTRIBUTORS 199